World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Connie Lovejoy

Connie Lovejoy

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
68
Citations
15092
World Ranking
1538
National Ranking
89

Connie Lovejoy publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie Lovejoy sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 187 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Connie Lovejoy D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie Lovejoy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Connie Lovejoy is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada and focuses research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their scholarly output spans several subfields including Ecology, Oceanography, Molecular Biology, Environmental Chemistry, and Atmospheric Science.

Their work engages extensively with topics related to Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Protist diversity and phylogeny, Marine and coastal ecosystems, Polar Research and Ecology, as well as Marine Biology and Ecology Research.

Connie Lovejoy's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Environmental vulnerability of the global ocean epipelagic plankton community interactome (2021), published in Science Advances
  • Genomic evidence for sulfur intermediates as new biogeochemical hubs in a model aquatic microbial ecosystem (2021), published in Microbiome
  • Convergent evolution and horizontal gene transfer in Arctic Ocean microalgae (2022), published in Life Science Alliance
  • Genomic evidence of functional diversity in DPANN archaea, from oxic species to anoxic vampiristic consortia (2022), published in ISME Communications
  • A decadal perspective on north water microbial eukaryotes as Arctic Ocean sentinels (2021), published in Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated include Warwick F. Vincent, Adrien Vigneron, John E. Walsh, Céline Guéguen, and Chris Bowler. The number of collaborations with these colleagues ranges from seven to twelve joint works.

Connie Lovejoy regularly publishes in venues such as OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), ISME Communications, Frontiers in Microbiology, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

The scientist has contributed to book publications as well, including a recent title published by Frontiers Media: "Microbial Response to a Rapidly Changing Marine Environment: Global Warming and Ocean Acidification, Volume II" released in 2023.

Best Publications

  • The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): Illuminating the Functional Diversity of Eukaryotic Life in the Oceans through Transcriptome Sequencing

    Patrick J. Keeling;Patrick J. Keeling;Fabien Burki;Heather M. Wilcox;Bassem Allam

  • Smallest algae thrive as the Arctic Ocean freshens.

    William K. W. Li;Fiona A. McLaughlin;Connie Lovejoy;Eddy C. Carmack

  • Ecology of the rare microbial biosphere of the Arctic Ocean

    Pierre E. Galand;Emilio O. Casamayor;David L. Kirchman;Connie Lovejoy

  • Arctic Ocean microbial community structure before and after the 2007 record sea ice minimum.

    André M. Comeau;William K.W. Li;Jean Éric Tremblay;Eddy C. Carmack

  • Distribution, phylogeny, and growth of cold-adapted picoprasinophytes in arctic seas

    Connie Lovejoy;Warwick F. Vincent;Sylvia Bonilla;Suzanne Roy

  • Algicidal Effects of a Novel Marine Pseudoalteromonas Isolate (Class Proteobacteria, Gamma Subdivision) on Harmful Algal Bloom Species of the Genera Chattonella, Gymnodinium, and Heterosigma

    Connie Lovejoy;John P. Bowman;John P. Bowman;Gustaaf M. Hallegraeff

  • Pole-to-pole biogeography of surface and deep marine bacterial communities

    Jean-François Ghiglione;Pierre E. Galand;Thomas Pommier;Carlos Pedrós-Alió

  • Diversity and distribution of marine microbial eukaryotes in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas.

    Connie Lovejoy;Ramon Massana;Carlos Pedrós-Alió

  • Role for urea in nitrification by polar marine Archaea.

    Laura Alonso-Saéz;Allison S Waller;Daniel R Mende;Kevin Bakker

  • Distribution and abundance of uncultured heterotrophic flagellates in the world oceans.

    Ramon Massana;Ramon Terrado;Irene Forn;Connie Lovejoy

  • The structure of bacterial communities in the western Arctic Ocean as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes.

    David L. Kirchman;Matthew T. Cottrell;Connie Lovejoy

  • Global distribution of cyanobacterial ecotypes in the cold biosphere.

    Anne D Jungblut;Connie Lovejoy;Warwick F Vincent

  • Microbes in high arctic snow and implications for the cold biosphere

    Tommy Harding;Anne D. Jungblut;Connie Lovejoy;Warwick F. Vincent

  • Picobiliphytes: A Marine Picoplanktonic Algal Group with Unknown Affinities to Other Eukaryotes

    Fabrice Not;Klaus Valentin;Khadidja Romari;Connie Lovejoy

  • Hydrography shapes bacterial biogeography of the deep Arctic Ocean

    Pierre E Galand;Pierre E Galand;Marianne Potvin;Emilio O Casamayor;Connie Lovejoy

  • Metagenomic Analysis of Stress Genes in Microbial Mat Communities from Antarctica and the High Arctic

    Thibault Varin;Connie Lovejoy;Anne D. Jungblut;Anne D. Jungblut;Warwick F. Vincent

  • Unique archaeal assemblages in the Arctic Ocean unveiled by massively parallel tag sequencing

    Pierre E Galand;Emilio O Casamayor;David L Kirchman;Marianne Potvin

  • Bipolar distribution of the cyst-forming dinoflagellate Polarella glacialis

    Marina Montresor;C Lovejoy;Luisa Orsini;Gabriele Procaccini

  • Prokaryotic community structure and heterotrophic production in a river-influenced coastal arctic ecosystem

    Marie-Ève Garneau;Warwick F. Vincent;Laura Alonso-Sáez;Yves Gratton

  • Current state and trends in Canadian Arctic marine ecosystems: II. Heterotrophic food web, pelagic-benthic coupling, and biodiversity

    Gérald Darnis;Dominique Robert;Corinne Pomerleau;Heike Link

  • Distribution of phytoplankton and other protists in the North Water

    Connie Lovejoy;Louis Legendre;Marie-Josée Martineau;Julie Bâcle

Frequent Co-Authors

Warwick F. Vincent
Warwick F. Vincent Université Laval
Jean-Éric Tremblay
Jean-Éric Tremblay Université Laval
Pierre E. Galand
Pierre E. Galand Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-Mer
Louis Legendre
Louis Legendre Université Paris Cité
Suzanne Roy
Suzanne Roy Université du Québec à Rimouski
Philippe Archambault
Philippe Archambault Université Laval
Carlos Pedrós-Alió
Carlos Pedrós-Alió Spanish National Research Council
Yves Gratton
Yves Gratton Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Marcel Babin
Marcel Babin Université Laval
Michel Gosselin
Michel Gosselin Université du Québec à Rimouski

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Ecology and Evolution grows, students often consider flexible online degree options to fit their lifestyles. When comparing online programs, it’s helpful to review how institutions stack up for various degrees. For those interested in healthcare pathways or biology, see this comparison of capella vs wgu rn to bsn programs.

Affordability is also critical. If you’re bridging undergraduate and graduate studies, you may want to explore the cheapest bsn to msn online programs. These options can help reduce financial barriers to advanced study, whether in ecology, healthcare, or related fields.

Prioritizing reputable, mission-driven schools matters just as much. Review this list of non profit online schools to find accredited and trustworthy programs.

Finally, for military students or veterans, choosing the right school can make a significant difference. Discover institutions recognized as military friendly colleges for optimal support and flexibility during your studies in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Connie Lovejoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles