World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
132
Citations
61815
World Ranking
2324
National Ranking
114

Günter Klöppel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Klöppel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 607 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Günter Klöppel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Klöppel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Günter Klöppel is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on oncology, epidemiology, surgery, neurology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research primarily concentrates on neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic and hepatic oncology, neuroblastoma, lung cancer, pancreatitis pathology and treatment, pancreatic function and diabetes, and gestational trophoblastic disease studies.

Klöppel's recent publications demonstrate a sustained interest in neuroendocrine neoplasms and tumor pathology. Notable papers include:

  • Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: diagnosis and pitfalls, 2021, published in Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • An analysis of 130 neuroendocrine tumors G3 regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic features, 2021, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for neuroendocrine tumour pathology, 2022, Journal of Neuroendocrinology
  • Neuroendocrine neoplasms of lung, pancreas and gut: a morphology-based comparison, 2020, Endocrine Related Cancer
  • Intra-abdominal EWSR1/FUS-CREM-rearranged malignant epithelioid neoplasms: two cases of an emerging aggressive entity with emphasis on misleading immunophenotype, 2021, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin

Frequent coauthors collaborate with Klöppel on multiple publications, underscoring connections within their research network. These coauthors include:

  • Atsuko Kasajima
  • Björn Konukiewitz
  • Wilko Weichert
  • Moritz Jesinghaus
  • Katja Steiger

Major publication venues where Klöppel's work appears include:

  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Endocrine Related Cancer
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Endocrine Pathology
  • Die Pathologie

Klöppel has also contributed to book publications, with works published by the American Registry of Pathology and Springer Nature. Titles include Tumors of the Pancreas (2023) and Pathologie (2020).

Their research output covers a range of topics within oncology and pathology, emphasizing neuroendocrine tumors and related cancer research. This is reflected in the distribution of their publications across subfields such as oncology, epidemiology, and surgery.

Best Publications

  • TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system

    G. Rindi;G. Klöppel;H. Alhman;M. Caplin

  • International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology.

    Tooru Shimosegawa;Suresh T. Chari;Luca Frulloni;Terumi Kamisawa

  • Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A New Nomenclature and Classification System for Pancreatic Duct Lesions

    R H Hruban;N V Adsay;J Albores-Saavedra;C Compton

  • An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

    Ralph H. Hruban;Kyoichi Takaori;David S. Klimstra;N. Volkan Adsay

  • ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

    M. Falconi;B. Eriksson;G. Kaltsas;D.K. Bartsch

  • European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

    Marco Del Chiaro;Marc G. Besselink;Lianne Scholten;Marco J. Bruno

  • The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: the WHO classification.

    Günter Klöppel;Aurel Perren;Aurel Perren;Philipp U. Heitz;Philipp U. Heitz

  • Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

    Sergio Pedrazzoli;Valerio DiCarlo;Renzo Dionigi;Franco Mosca

  • A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal.

    Guido Rindi;David S. Klimstra;Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani;Sylvia L. Asa

  • Stat3/Socs3 activation by IL-6 transsignaling promotes progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and development of pancreatic cancer.

    Marina Lesina;Magdalena U. Kurkowski;Katharina Ludes;Stefan Rose-John

  • Histopathological features of diagnostic and clinical relevance in autoimmune pancreatitis: a study on 53 resection specimens and 9 biopsy specimens

    Giuseppe Zamboni;Jutta Lüttges;Paola Capelli;Luca Frulloni

  • Islet Pathology and the Pathogenesis of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Revisited

    Günter Klöppel;Matthias Löhr;Klaus Habich;Martin Oberholzer

  • Mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathological features, prognosis, and relationship to other mucinous cystic tumors.

    Giuseppe Zamboni;Aldo Scarpa;Giuseppe Bogina;Calogero Iacono

  • Classification of types of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a consensus study.

    Toru Furukawa;Günter Klöppel;N. Volkan Adsay;Jorge Albores-Saavedra

  • A Revised Classification System and Recommendations From the Baltimore Consensus Meeting for Neoplastic Precursor Lesions in the Pancreas.

    Olca Basturk;Seung Mo Hong;Laura D. Wood;N. Volkan Adsay

  • Tumors of the Pancreas

    Enrico Solcia;Carlo Capella;Günter Klöppel

  • Histological Typing of Endocrine Tumours

    Enrico Solcia;Günter Klöppel;Leslie H. Sobin

  • Revised classification of neuroendocrine tumours of the lung, pancreas and gut.

    C. Capella;P. U. Heitz;H. Höfler;E. Solcia

  • Recommendations for the nomenclature of IgG4-related disease and its individual organ system manifestations

    John H. Stone;Arezou Khosroshahi;Vikram Deshpande;John K. C. Chan

  • ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Non-Functioning Tumors

    Massimo Falconi;Detlef Klaus Bartsch;Barbro Eriksson;Günter Klöppel

Frequent Co-Authors

Bence Sipos
Bence Sipos University of Tübingen
Aurel Perren
Aurel Perren University of Bern
Giuseppe Zamboni
Giuseppe Zamboni University of Verona
David S. Klimstra
David S. Klimstra Yale University
Thomas M. Gress
Thomas M. Gress Philipp University of Marburg
Wolff Schmiegel
Wolff Schmiegel Ruhr University Bochum
Irene Esposito
Irene Esposito Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Bertram Wiedenmann
Bertram Wiedenmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Carlo Capella
Carlo Capella University of Insubria
Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but seeking alternative pathways beyond traditional medical school, there are several online degree options available. For those who do not have a nursing background, direct entry msn online programs provide an accelerated route to a Master of Science in Nursing, opening doors to advanced practice and leadership roles.

Applicants seeking less competitive admissions might consider the easiest nursing schools to get into, where flexible prerequisites help more students find their entry point into nursing careers.

For those interested in administrative healthcare positions, the best online medical billing and coding schools offer accredited programs with financial aid, equipping students for in-demand medical records and billing roles.

Furthermore, not all nursing tracks require entrance exams. If you want to learn more about alternative requirements, see do you have to take a teas test for lpn for programs that waive these common exams, making the admissions process more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Klöppel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles