World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
13019
World Ranking
13099
National Ranking
5585

Kyle E. Orwig publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle E. Orwig sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 217 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kyle E. Orwig D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle E. Orwig sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kyle E. Orwig is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their work predominantly focuses on fields within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong emphasis on reproductive medicine, public health, molecular biology, genetics, and surgery.

The scientist's research interests cover a broad spectrum of topics related to reproductive biology and fertility, sperm and testicular function, reproductive health and technologies, and associated areas such as renal cancers, genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities, ovarian function and disorders, and pluripotent stem cells research.

Kyle E. Orwig has contributed to multiple scholarly articles published in a range of venues. Frequent publication platforms include Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Fertility and Sterility, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, and Human Reproduction.

Some notable recent papers by Kyle E. Orwig include:

  • Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Human, Macaque, and Mouse Testes Uncovers Conserved and Divergent Features of Mammalian Spermatogenesis, 2020, Developmental Cell
  • Single-cell analysis of human testis aging and correlation with elevated body mass index, 2022, Developmental Cell
  • Standardizing Risk Assessment for Treatment-Related Gonadal Insufficiency and Infertility in Childhood Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: The Pediatric Initiative Network Risk Stratification System, 2020, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
  • Transcriptome profiling reveals signaling conditions dictating human spermatogonia fate in vitro, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Ovarian tissue cryopreservation as standard of care: what does this mean for pediatric populations?, 2020, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Kyle E. Orwig collaborates frequently with other researchers in their field. Regular co-authors include Meena Sukhwani, Sarah K. Munyoki, Amanda C. Zielen, Saher Sue Hammoud, and Jun Z. Li.

Best Publications

  • Essential role of Plzf in maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells

    José A Costoya;Robin M Hobbs;Maria Barna;Giorgio Cattoretti

  • Spermatogonial stem cell regulation and spermatogenesis

    Bart T. Phillips;Kathrin Gassei;Kyle E. Orwig

  • Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells.

    Takashi Shinohara;Kyle E. Orwig;Mary R. Avarbock;Ralph L. Brinster

  • Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation into Rhesus Testes Regenerates Spermatogenesis Producing Functional Sperm

    Brian Peter Hermann;Meena Sukhwani;Felicity Winkler;Julia N. Pascarella

  • Transgenic mice produced by retroviral transduction of male germ-line stem cells.

    Makoto Nagano;Clayton J. Brinster;Kyle E. Orwig;Buom-Yong Ryu

  • Remodeling of the postnatal mouse testis is accompanied by dramatic changes in stem cell number and niche accessibility

    Takashi Shinohara;Kyle E. Orwig;Mary R. Avarbock;Ralph L. Brinster

  • Effects of aging and niche microenvironment on spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal.

    Buom-Yong Ryu;Kyle E. Orwig;Jon M. Oatley;Mary R. Avarbock

  • Spermatogonial stem cells and spermatogenesis in mice, monkeys and men.

    Adetunji P. Fayomi;Kyle E. Orwig

  • Direct Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into Haploid Spermatogenic Cells

    Charles A. Easley;Bart T. Phillips;Megan M. McGuire;Jennifer M. Barringer

  • Autologous grafting of cryopreserved prepubertal rhesus testis produces sperm and offspring.

    Adetunji P. Fayomi;Karen Peters;Meena Sukhwani;Hanna Valli-Pulaski

  • GDNF Family Receptor alpha1 Phenotype of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Immature Mouse Testes

    Anyanee Buageaw;Anyanee Buageaw;Meena Sukhwani;Ahmi Ben-Yehudah;Jens Ehmcke

  • Characterization, cryopreservation and ablation of spermatogonial stem cells in adult rhesus macaques

    Brian P. Hermann;Meena Sukhwani;Chih Cheng Lin;Yi Sheng

  • Restoration of fertility by germ cell transplantation requires effective recipient preparation.

    Clayton J. Brinster;Buom-Yong Ryu;Mary R. Avarbock;Levent Karagenc

  • Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Human, Macaque, and Mouse Testes Uncovers Conserved and Divergent Features of Mammalian Spermatogenesis.

    Adrienne Niederriter Shami;Xianing Zheng;Sarah K. Munyoki;Qianyi Ma

  • SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 coordinate spermatogonial differentiation.

    Hitomi Suzuki;Hyo Won Ahn;Tianjiao Chu;Wayne Bowden

  • Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents?

    Brian P Hermann;Meena Sukhwani;Marc C Hansel;Kyle E Orwig

  • Phenotypic and functional characteristics of spermatogonial stem cells in rats.

    Buom-Yong Ryu;Kyle E. Orwig;Hiroshi Kubota;Mary R. Avarbock

  • Molecular dissection of the male germ cell lineage identifies putative spermatogonial stem cells in rhesus macaques

    Brian P. Hermann;Meena Sukhwani;David R. Simorangkir;Tianjiao Chu

  • Cryopreservation and Transplantation of Spermatogonia and Testicular Tissue for Preservation of Male Fertility

    Kyle E Orwig;Stefan Schlatt

  • Restoration of Spermatogenesis in Infertile Mice by Sertoli Cell Transplantation

    Takashi Shinohara;Kyle E. Orwig;Mary R. Avarbock;Ralph L. Brinster

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary R. Avarbock
Mary R. Avarbock University of Pennsylvania
Michael J. Soares
Michael J. Soares University of Kansas
Ralph L. Brinster
Ralph L. Brinster University of Pennsylvania
Amander T. Clark
Amander T. Clark University of California, Los Angeles
Teresa K. Woodruff
Teresa K. Woodruff Northwestern University
Renee A. Reijo Pera
Renee A. Reijo Pera California Polytechnic State University
Gerald Schatten
Gerald Schatten University of Pittsburgh
Takashi Shinohara
Takashi Shinohara Kyoto University
Marvin L. Meistrich
Marvin L. Meistrich The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jun Li
Jun Li University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens up diverse career options beyond traditional research or lab roles. For those interested in the intersection of science and business, a cheap online mba healthcare administration can equip you with leadership and management skills tailored for the healthcare sector. These online programs are flexible and increasingly affordable, making advanced credentials accessible for busy students and professionals.

Alternatively, careers in healthcare administration and medical coding continue to grow. Earning a cpc certification is a valuable way to break into medical billing or coding, roles that support hospital efficiency and accuracy. Salaries in this field are competitive; explore medical coding salary trends to understand earning potential.

If you are considering whether this is the right path, it's wise to research the pros and cons of the industry. Discover firsthand insights about the profession by reading is medical coding a good job before making your decision. Whether your interests are clinical or administrative, there are many pathways to a fulfilling career in bioscience and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Kyle E. Orwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles