World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
67
Citations
16519
World Ranking
1600
National Ranking
203

Graham N. Stone publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham N. Stone sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 216 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Graham N. Stone D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham N. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham N. Stone is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant number of publications in the subfields of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, and Plant Science. Other areas of interest include Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's work covers various topics including:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Research on scale insects
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Graham N. Stone has coauthored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • James A. Nicholls (27 publications)
  • George Melika (21 publications)
  • J. L. Nieves-Aldrey (12 publications)
  • Chang-Ti Tang (11 publications)
  • Juli Pujade-Villar (11 publications)

Their frequent publication venues are diverse, with numerous articles appearing in journals and outlets such as:

  • Zootaxa (15 publications)
  • Molecular Ecology (6 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (5 publications)
  • Global Biodiversity Information Facility (4 publications)
  • Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington (3 publications)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Graham N. Stone are:

  • "Quantifying nectar production by flowering plants in urban and rural landscapes" (2021, Journal of Ecology)
  • "Gradients in richness and turnover of a forest passerine's diet prior to breeding: A mixed model approach applied to faecal metabarcoding data" (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • "Reliably predicting pollinator abundance: Challenges of calibrating process-based ecological models" (2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
  • "Does agri-environment scheme participation in England increase pollinator populations and crop pollination services?" (2021, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment)
  • "Sharing and reporting benefits from biodiversity research" (2020, Molecular Ecology)

Best Publications

  • Environmental Physiology of Animals

    P. G. Willmer;Graham N. Stone;Ian A. Johnston

  • The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology

    Graham N. Stone;Karsten Schönrogge

  • Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects.

    Katherine C. R. Baldock;Mark A. Goddard;Mark A. Goddard;Damien M. Hicks;William E.. Kunin

  • The city as a refuge for insect pollinators.

    Damon M. Hall;Gerardo R. Camilo;Rebecca K. Tonietto;Jeff Ollerton

  • The Population Biology of Oak Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)

    Graham N Stone;Karsten Schonrogge;Rachel J Atkinson;David Bellido

  • A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities

    Katherine C. R. Baldock;Mark A. Goddard;Damien M. Hicks;William E. Kunin

  • Evolution and diversity of Rickettsia bacteria

    Lucy A Weinert;John H Werren;Alexandre Aebi;Graham N Stone

  • Food for Pollinators: Quantifying the Nectar and Pollen Resources of Urban Flower Meadows

    Damien M. Hicks;Pierre Ouvrard;Pierre Ouvrard;Katherine C. R. Baldock;Mathilde Baude;Mathilde Baude

  • Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant

    David Giron;Elisabeth Huguet;Graham N. Stone;Mélanie Body

  • Differential var gene transcription in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from patients with cerebral malaria compared to hyperparasitaemia

    Helen M Kyriacou;Graham N. Stone;Richard J Challis;Arif Ahmed Raza

  • The structure of cynipid oak galls: patterns in the evolution of an extended phenotype

    Graham N. Stone;James M. Cook

  • Behavioral, ecological, and physiological determinants of the activity patterns of bees

    P.G. Willmer;G.N. Stone

  • The diversity and phylogeography of cynipid gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) of the Oriental and eastern Palearctic regions, and their associated communities

    Yoshihisa Abe;George Melika;Graham N. Stone

  • Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators

    Richard J. Gill;Katherine C R Baldock;Mark J F Brown;James E. Cresswell

  • Reproductive biology of Australian acacias: Important mediator of invasiveness?

    Michelle R. Gibson;David M. Richardson;Elizabete Marchante;Hélia Marchante;Hélia Marchante

  • PARTITIONING OF POLLINATORS DURING FLOWERING IN AN AFRICAN ACACIA COMMUNITY

    Graham N. Stone;Pat Willmer;J. Alexandra Rowe

  • Warm-Up Rates and Body Temperatures in Bees: The Importance of Body Size, Thermal Regime and Phylogeny

    G. N. Stone;P. G. Willmer

  • Host niches and defensive extended phenotypes structure parasitoid wasp communities

    Richard G Bailey;Karsten Schönrogge;James M. Cook;James M. Cook;George Melika

  • Out of Anatolia: longitudinal gradients in genetic diversity support an eastern origin for a circum-Mediterranean oak gallwasp Andricus quercustozae

    Antonis Rokas;Antonis Rokas;Rachel J. Atkinson;Rachel J. Atkinson;Lucy M.I. Webster;György Csóka

  • Extreme Host Plant Conservatism During at Least 20 Million Years of Host Plant Pursuit by Oak Gallwasps

    Graham N. Stone;Antonio Hernandez-Lopez;James A. Nicholls;Erica di Pierro

  • Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species

    Graham N. Stone;Sean Nee;Joseph Felsenstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Karsten Schönrogge
Karsten Schönrogge Imperial College London
Antonis Rokas
Antonis Rokas Vanderbilt University
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
James M. Cook
James M. Cook Western Sydney University
Pat Willmer
Pat Willmer University of St Andrews
Nigel E. Raine
Nigel E. Raine University of Guelph
Jane Memmott
Jane Memmott University of Bristol
Michael J. Hickerson
Michael J. Hickerson City University of New York
William E. Kunin
William E. Kunin University of Leeds
Alfried P. Vogler
Alfried P. Vogler Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career paths, including healthcare and nursing. Many students interested in life sciences find related opportunities in fields like nursing, leveraging their biology background to transition into rewarding healthcare roles.

If you’re considering shifting to nursing, understanding how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner can help you plan your educational pathway efficiently. Fast-track programs are available, such as the popular 6 month rn to bsn program, designed for current registered nurses looking to advance.

For those with an associate degree, rn to np programs offer bridge options to earn a master’s and become a nurse practitioner faster. Even individuals without prior nursing credentials will find flexible options; online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses can accelerate entry into the nursing profession.

These online, accelerated tracks are ideal for students with a background in ecology, biology, or related fields who wish to pivot into healthcare, responding to growing demand for qualified nurses and science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Graham N. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles