World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
40350
World Ranking
8234
National Ranking
4266

Geraldine S. Pinkus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geraldine S. Pinkus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Geraldine S. Pinkus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geraldine S. Pinkus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geraldine S. Pinkus is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on subspecialties including Hematology, Immunology, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Oncology.

Their scientific work covers a range of topics centered on hematologic and oncologic diseases. Key areas include Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, Immune Cell Function and Interaction, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment. Additionally, studies related to COVID-19 Clinical Research, Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes, and Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments form part of their scholarly output.

Among their recent scholarly publications are several papers that reflect this research focus:

  • "Skeletal Muscle and Peripheral Nerve Histopathology in COVID-19" (2021, Neurology)
  • "Peripheral host T cells survive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and promote graft-versus-host disease" (2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • "Detection of the KIT mutation in myelodysplastic and/or myeloproliferative neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes predicts concurrent systemic mastocytosis" (2020, Modern Pathology)
  • "miR-15a/16-1 deletion in activated B cells promotes plasma cell and mature B-cell neoplasms" (2021, Blood)
  • "Global assessment of IRF8 as a novel cancer biomarker" (2022, Human Pathology)

Research collaborations are an integral part of their work, with frequent co-authorship alongside the following individuals:

  • Robert P. Hasserjian
  • Elizabeth A. Morgan
  • Olga K. Weinberg
  • Annette S. Kim
  • Robert F. Padera

Publication venues where Geraldine S. Pinkus has contributed multiple papers include:

  • Modern Pathology
  • Blood
  • Human Pathology
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation

The focus on Hematology is evident with thirteen documented publications, supported by extensive research in Immunology and Genetics, and contributions to Pathology and Oncology literature. Their scientific output includes investigations into cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying malignancies and immune responses relevant to transplantation and cancer biology.

Best Publications

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning

    Margaret A. Shipp;Ken N. Ross;Pablo Tamayo;Andrew P. Weng

  • Positional cloning of zebrafish ferroportin1 identifies a conserved vertebrate iron exporter

    Adriana Donovan;Alison Brownlie;Alison Brownlie;Yi Zhou;Jennifer Shepard

  • MYD88 L265P Somatic Mutation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

    Steven P. Treon;Lian Xu;Guang Yang;Yangsheng Zhou

  • The iron exporter ferroportin/Slc40a1 is essential for iron homeostasis

    Adriana Donovan;Adriana Donovan;Christine A. Lima;Christine A. Lima;Jack L. Pinkus;Geraldine S. Pinkus

  • Expression of human B cell-associated antigens on leukemias and lymphomas: a model of human B cell differentiation

    Kenneth C. Anderson;Michael P. Bates;Bruce L. Slaughenhoupt;Geraldine S. Pinkus

  • The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Kerry J. Savage;Stefano Monti;Jeffery L. Kutok;Giorgio Cattoretti

  • Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response

    Stefano Monti;Kerry J. Savage;Jeffery L. Kutok;Friedrich Feuerhake

  • TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

    Brandon Lawrence;Antonio Perez-Atayde;Michele K. Hibbard;Brian P. Rubin

  • Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals AML Hierarchies Relevant to Disease Progression and Immunity.

    Peter van Galen;Volker Hovestadt;Marc H. Wadsworth;Marc H. Wadsworth;Marc H. Wadsworth;Travis K. Hughes;Travis K. Hughes;Travis K. Hughes

  • Interferon‐α/β–mediated innate immune mechanisms in dermatomyositis

    Steven A. Greenberg;Jack L. Pinkus;Geraldine S. Pinkus;Travis Burleson

  • Targetable genetic features of primary testicular and primary central nervous system lymphomas

    Bjoern Chapuy;Margaretha G. M. Roemer;Margaretha G. M. Roemer;Chip Stewart;Yuxiang Tan

  • All advanced stage non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with a polymerase chain reaction amplifiable breakpoint of bcl-2 have residual cells containing the bcl-2 rearrangement at evaluation and after treatment.

    John G. Gribben;Arnold S. Freedman;Sunhee D. Woo;Kelly Blake

  • Improved prognosis of diffuse histiocytic and undifferentiated lymphoma by use of high dose methotrexate alternating with standard agents (M-BACOD).

    Arthur T. Skarin;George P. Canellos;David S. Rosenthal;Delvyn C. Case

  • The Differentiation and Stress Response Factor XBP-1 Drives Multiple Myeloma Pathogenesis

    Daniel R. Carrasco;Kumar Sukhdeo;Marina Protopopova;Raktim Sinha

  • Programmed Death Ligand 1 Is Expressed by Non–Hodgkin Lymphomas and Inhibits the Activity of Tumor-Associated T Cells

    David J. Andorsky;Reiko E. Yamada;Jonathan Said;Geraldine S. Pinkus

  • A mouse model of juvenile hemochromatosis

    Franklin W. Huang;Jack L. Pinkus;Geraldine S. Pinkus;Mark D. Fleming

  • Epithelial membrane antigen--a diagnostic discriminant in surgical pathology: immunohistochemical profile in epithelial, mesenchymal, and hematopoietic neoplasms using paraffin sections and monoclonal antibodies.

    Geraldine S. Pinkus;Paul J. Kurtin

  • Diagnostic Relevance of Clonal Cytogenetic Aberrations in Malignant Soft-Tissue Tumors

    Jonathan A. Fletcher;Harry P. Kozakewich;Fredric A. Hoffer;Janice M. Lage

  • Immunohistochemistry of a gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP-15) of the breast. A marker of apocrine epithelium and breast carcinomas with apocrine features.

    G. Mazoujian;G. S. Pinkus;S. Davis;D. E. Haagensen

  • Identification of major prognostic subgroups of patients with large-cell lymphoma treated with m-BACOD or M-BACOD.

    Margaret A. Shipp;David P. Harrington;Mary M. Klatt;Maxine S. Jochelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott J. Rodig
Scott J. Rodig Harvard University
Margaret A. Shipp
Margaret A. Shipp Harvard University
Jonathan W. Said
Jonathan W. Said University of California, Los Angeles
Jon C. Aster
Jon C. Aster Harvard Medical School
Mark D. Fleming
Mark D. Fleming Boston Children's Hospital
David M. Dorfman
David M. Dorfman Harvard Medical School
Jeffery L. Kutok
Jeffery L. Kutok Epizyme (United States)
Jason L. Hornick
Jason L. Hornick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Donna Neuberg
Donna Neuberg Harvard University
George P. Canellos
George P. Canellos Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to a traditional MD can open many doors in healthcare. Online degrees provide flexible, accessible routes for those aiming for medical or nursing careers. For those interested in advanced research or leadership within nursing, phd in nursing online programs offer rigorous academic training while accommodating busy schedules.

If you are already a registered nurse, you might consider the cheapest online rn to bsn programs. These programs are designed to boost your credentials and open up further career opportunities without breaking the bank.

Those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree can opt for msn direct entry programs online. These allow fast-tracking into advanced nursing practice, offering a direct pathway to become a nurse practitioner or leader.

For applicants seeking an accessible entry point, understanding what is the easiest nursing school to get into can help identify options with lower admission barriers. These pathways provide opportunities for diverse backgrounds to join the healthcare workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Geraldine S. Pinkus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles