World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
19587
World Ranking
18506
National Ranking
9223

George L. Spaeth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George L. Spaeth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 729 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George L. Spaeth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George L. Spaeth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George L. Spaeth is affiliated with Wills Eye Hospital in the United States and has focused their research primarily within Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Ophthalmology.

Their work covers various subfields including Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Anatomy.

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Medical and Biological Sciences

Some recent publications by George L. Spaeth include:

  • European Glaucoma Society - A guide on surgical innovation for glaucoma, 2023, British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Survey for Evaluating Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery, 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Correlation between Central Visual Field Defects and Stereopsis in Patients with Early-to-Moderate Visual Field Loss, 2023, Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • Keratoconus with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Rare Combination, 2020, Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine
  • Improvement in structure and visual function in patients with glaucoma: the possible key to better treatment?, 2020, Survey of Ophthalmology

Frequent coauthors in Spaeth's research include Ronald L. Fellman, Ron D. Hays, Michelle E. Tarver, Kuldev Singh, and Αναστασία Τσιώγκα.

The venues where Spaeth's work is regularly published include:

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Survey of Ophthalmology
  • Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine

Best Publications

  • Identification of a novel adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) gene on 5q22.1

    Sharareh Monemi;George Spaeth;Alexander DaSilva;Samuel Popinchalk

  • Aniridia. A review

    Leonard B. Nelson;George L. Spaeth;Thaddeus S. Nowinski;Curtis E. Margo

  • Analysis of 13 cell types reveals evidence for the expression of numerous novel primate- And tissue-specific microRNAs

    Eric Londina;Phillipe Lohera;Aristeidis G. Telonis;Kevin Quann

  • Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc.

    Rohit Varma;James M. Tielsch;Harry A. Quigley;Sterling C. Hilton

  • Color Doppler Analysis of Ocular Vessel Blood Velocity in Normal-tension Glaucoma

    A. Harris;R.C. Sergott;G.L. Spaeth;J.L. Katz

  • Compliance in patients prescribed eyedrops for glaucoma

    Santosh C Patel;George L Spaeth

  • Comparison of Visual Field Defects in the Low-Tension Glaucomas with Those in the High-Tension Glaucomas

    Joseph Caprioli;George L. Spaeth

  • Loss of visual acuity after trabeculectomy.

    Vital P. Costa;Maura Smith;George L. Spaeth;Sai Gandham

  • Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma.

    Lisa S. Abrams;Ingrid U. Scott;George L. Spaeth;Harry A. Quigley

  • Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma.

    George Spaeth;John Walt;John Keener

  • Comparison of the optic nerve head in high- and low-tension glaucoma.

    Joseph Caprioli;George L. Spaeth

  • Short- and Long-Term Effects of Postoperative Corticosteroids on Trabeculectomy

    Richard J. Starita;Ronald L. Fellman;George L. Spaeth;Effie M. Poryzees

  • Wound healing modulation in glaucoma filtration surgery.

    Vital P Costa;George L Spaeth;Richard A Eiferman;Silvia Orengo-Nania

  • The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

    Müge R Kesen;George L Spaeth;Jeffrey D Henderer;Mary Lucy M Pereira

  • The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

    George L Spaeth;Jeffrey Henderer;Connie Liu;Muge Kesen

  • Complications of Surgery in Glaucoma: Early and Late Bacterial Endophthalmitis Following Glaucoma Filtering Surgery

    L.J. Katz;Louis B. Cantor;George L. Spaeth

  • Test/Retest Reproducibility of Color Doppler Imaging Assessment of Blood Flow Velocity in Orbital Vessels

    Alon Harris;Thomas H. Williamson;Bruce Martin;John A. Shoemaker

  • A Ten-year Follow-up on a Prospective, Randomized Trial of Postoperative Corticosteroids after Trabeculectomy

    Silvana V. Araujo;George L. Spaeth;Shari M. Roth;Richard J. Starita

  • Retrobulbar arterial hemodynamic effects of betaxolol and timolol in normal-tension glaucoma.

    A. Harris;G.L. Spaeth;R.C. Sergott;L.J. Katz

  • Reversal of optic disc cupping after glaucoma surgery analyzed with a scanning laser tomograph.

    Mark R Lesk;George L Spaeth;Augusto Azuara-Blanco;Silvana V Araujo

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Caprioli
Joseph Caprioli University of California, Los Angeles
Alon Harris
Alon Harris Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Rohit Varma
Rohit Varma University of Southern California
Khaled K. Abu-Amero
Khaled K. Abu-Amero King Saud University
Robert Ritch
Robert Ritch New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Gary C. Brown
Gary C. Brown SUNY Upstate Medical University
Harry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley Johns Hopkins University
Peter R. Laibson
Peter R. Laibson Wills Eye Hospital
Mansoor Sarfarazi
Mansoor Sarfarazi University of Connecticut Health Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a career in medicine, several related online degrees and alternative healthcare pathways are worth considering. Many students look for flexible options that balance education, career advancement, and life commitments.

For those interested in nursing, you can explore a nursing school that doesn't require teas. These programs provide greater accessibility for prospective nurses by removing barriers like the TEAS or HESI entrance exams.

A popular path for advancing your healthcare career is an administrative role. Consider enrolling in one of the best online healthcare administration degree programs. These degrees are designed for quick completion and open doors to management positions in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses aiming to become family nurse practitioners can accelerate their journey through adn to fnp programs. These bridge programs allow ADN-prepared nurses to advance to the MSN level and expand their scope of practice.

Additionally, those passionate about health and wellness can pursue an online nutritionist degree. This option prepares you for roles in nutrition counseling, education, and dietetics, all through flexible online study.

Best Scientists Citing George L. Spaeth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles