World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
11108
World Ranking
4227
National Ranking
148

Geoff Eaglesham publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Eaglesham sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Geoff Eaglesham D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Eaglesham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoff Eaglesham is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research predominantly centers around environmental science, agricultural and biological sciences, and medicine.

The scientist's work covers key fields such as pollution, plant science, molecular biology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and toxicology. Their main research topics include pesticide and herbicide environmental studies, forensic toxicology and drug analysis, psychedelics and drug studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, pesticide exposure and toxicity, weed control and herbicide applications, and smoking behavior and cessation.

Frequently publishing in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Talanta, Drug Testing and Analysis, Applied Microbiology, and Environmental Science & Technology, Eaglesham has contributed to a number of studies that address environmental and toxicological concerns.

  • Quantification of new psychoactive substances in Australian wastewater utilising direct injection liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (2022, Talanta)
  • Characterization of glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the urine of Australian and New Zealand populations (2022, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Determination of anabasine, anatabine, and nicotine biomarkers in wastewater by enhanced direct injection LC-MS/MS and evaluation of their in-sewer stability (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Direct injection analysis of oxypurinol and metformin in wastewater by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (2022, Drug Testing and Analysis)
  • The Effects of Atrazine, Diuron, Fluazifop-P-butyl, Haloxyfop-P-methyl, and Pendimethalin on Soil Microbial Activity and Diversity (2023, Applied Microbiology)

Eaglesham's frequent co-authors include Jochen F. Mueller, Leisa-Maree Toms, Kevin V. Thomas, Pritesh Prasad, and Katja M. Shimko. Collaborative work with these researchers spans various topics primarily related to environmental toxicology and analytical chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Human Fatalities from Cyanobacteria: Chemical and Biological Evidence for Cyanotoxins

    Wayne W Carmichael;Sandra M.F.O Azevedo;Ji Si An;Renato J.R. Molica

  • Human intoxication by microcystins during renal dialysis treatment in Caruaru-Brazil

    Sandra M.F.O. Azevedo;Wayne W. Carmichael;Elise M. Jochimsen;Kenneth L. Rinehart

  • Stability of cylindrospermopsin, the toxin from the cyanobacterium, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii: Effect of pH, temperature, and sunlight on decomposition

    Robyn K. Chiswell;Glen R. Shaw;Geoff Eaglesham;Maree J. Smith

  • Human fatalities from cyanobacteria: chemical and biological evidence for cyanotoxins.

    Unknown

  • FIRST REPORT OF THE CYANOTOXINS CYLINDROSPERMOPSIN AND DEOXYCYLINDROSPERMOPSIN FROM RAPHIDIOPSIS CURVATA (CYANOBACTERIA)

    Renhui Li;Wayne W. Carmichael;Scott Brittain;Geoffrey K. Eaglesham

  • A mass estimate of perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) release from Australian wastewater treatment plants.

    C. Gallen;G. Eaglesham;D. Drage;T. Hue Nguyen

  • Refining the estimation of illicit drug consumptions from wastewater analysis: Co-analysis of prescription pharmaceuticals and uncertainty assessment

    Foon Yin Lai;Christoph Ort;Christoph Ort;Coral Gartner;Steve Carter

  • Isolation and identification of the cyanotoxin cylindrospermopsin and deoxy-cylindrospermopsin from a Thailand strain of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Cyanobacteria).

    R. Li;W.W. Carmichael;S. Brittain;G.K. Eaglesham

  • The accumulation of cylindrospermopsin from the cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii in tissues of the Redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus.

    Martin L. Saker;Geoff K. Eaglesham

  • First evidence for the production of cylindrospermopsin and deoxy-cylindrospermopsin by the freshwater benthic cyanobacterium, Lyngbya wollei (Farlow ex Gomont) Speziale and Dyck

    Mark Seifert;Glenn McGregor;Geoff Eaglesham;Wasantha Wickramasinghe;Wasantha Wickramasinghe

  • Emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals, personal care products, a food additive and pesticides) in waters of Sydney estuary, Australia.

    G.F. Birch;D.S. Drage;K. Thompson;G. Eaglesham

  • Analysis of cyanobacterial toxins by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    Carmela Dell’Aversano;Geoffrey K Eaglesham;Michael A Quilliam

  • Removal of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluoroalkyl acids at water reclamation plants in South East Queensland Australia.

    Jack Thompson;Geoff Eaglesham;Julien Reungoat;Yvan Poussade

  • Blooms of the cylindrospermopsin containing cyanobacterium, Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Forti), in newly constructed lakes, Queensland, Australia

    Glen R. Shaw;Assaf Sukenik;Adi Livne;Robyn K. Chiswell

  • Australia-wide assessment of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in landfill leachates.

    C. Gallen;D. Drage;G. Eaglesham;S. Grant

  • Determining the fraction of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater originating from a hospital.

    Christoph Ort;Michael G. Lawrence;Julien Reungoat;Geoff Eaglesham

  • Effects of the herbicide diuron on the early life history stages of coral.

    Andrew P Negri;Claudia Vollhardt;Craig Humphrey;Andrew J Heyward

  • Concentrations of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluorinated alkyl acids in Australian drinking water.

    Jack Thompson;Geoff Eaglesham;Jochen Mueller

  • Monitoring pesticides in the Great Barrier Reef.

    Melanie Shaw;Miles J. Furnas;Miles J. Furnas;Katharina Fabricius;Katharina Fabricius;David Haynes

  • A model to estimate the population contributing to the wastewater using samples collected on census day

    Jake W. O'Brien;Phong K. Thai;Geoff Eaglesham;Christoph Ort;Christoph Ort

  • First report and toxicological assessment of the cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii from Portuguese freshwaters

    Martin L. Saker;Isabel C.G. Nogueira;Vitor M. Vasconcelos;Brett A. Neilan

  • Synergistic effects of diuron and sedimentation on photosynthesis and survival of crustose coralline algae

    Lindsay Harrington;Katharina Fabricius;Geoff Eaglesham;Andrew Negri

  • Hepatic xenobiotic metabolism of cylindrospermopsin in vivo in the mouse.

    R.L.G. Norris;A.A Seawright;Glendon Reginald Shaw;P. Senogles

  • Uptake and release of polar compounds in SDB-RPS Empore disks; implications for their use as passive samplers.

    Melanie Shaw;Geoff Eaglesham;Jochen F. Mueller

  • Rapid, automated online SPE-LC-QTRAP-MS/MS method for the simultaneous analysis of 14 phthalate metabolites and 5 bisphenol analogues in human urine.

    A.L. Heffernan;K. Thompson;G. Eaglesham;S. Vijayasarathy

Frequent Co-Authors

Jochen F. Mueller
Jochen F. Mueller University of Queensland
Phong K. Thai
Phong K. Thai University of Queensland
Christoph Ort
Christoph Ort Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
Raimondo Bruno
Raimondo Bruno University of Tasmania
Pim E.G. Leonards
Pim E.G. Leonards Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Andrew P. Negri
Andrew P. Negri Australian Institute of Marine Science
Des Connell
Des Connell Griffith University
Katharina Fabricius
Katharina Fabricius Australian Institute of Marine Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, there are numerous online degree options that complement this field. Educators and professionals looking to advance their careers may explore programs like edd without dissertation, which offers flexibility for those balancing studies with other responsibilities.

Many students prioritize quality and recognition when selecting a program. Accredited options such as the accredited eds to edd programs ensure that learners receive respected credentials important for career advancement in education and environmental fields alike.

For professionals aiming to merge social work with environmental advocacy, affordable and reputable programs like the dsw program offer pathways to advanced practice and leadership roles.

Alternatively, those seeking a broad skill set can consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which provide a versatile foundation applicable to many environmental careers and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Geoff Eaglesham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles