World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
46
Citations
12444
World Ranking
1408
National Ranking
17

Javier Bonet publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Bonet sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 164 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Javier Bonet D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Bonet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the International Association for Computational Mechanics (IACM)

Overview

Javier Bonet is affiliated with the University of Greenwich in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering. Their work spans several subfields including Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Numerical Analysis, and Applied Mathematics.

The researcher's main areas of study include:

  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

Bonet has contributed numerous publications to academic journals and conferences. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computational Particle Mechanics
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bonet cover various topics within computational solid dynamics and computational mechanics. Selected recent works include:

  • "An improved updated Lagrangian SPH method for structural modelling," 2023, Computational Particle Mechanics
  • "A first order hyperbolic framework for large strain computational solid dynamics. Part III: Thermo-elasticity," 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • "An entropy-stable Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics algorithm for large strain thermo-elasticity," 2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • "A New Updated Reference Lagrangian Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics algorithm for isothermal elasticity and elasto-plasticity," 2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • "An entropy-stable updated reference Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics algorithm for thermo-elasticity and thermo-visco-plasticity," 2023, Computational Particle Mechanics

Their scholarly collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Antonio J. Gil, Chun Hean Lee, Rogelio Ortigosa, and Richard D. Wood.

Javier Bonet has also authored work published by Cambridge University Press, including the book titled Nonlinear Solid Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis: Dynamics (2021).

In recognition of their contributions to computational mechanics, Bonet was named a Fellow of the International Association for Computational Mechanics (IACM) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis

    Javier Bonet;Richard Dawson Wood

  • Variational and momentum preservation aspects of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic formulations

    J. Bonet;T.-S.L. Lok

  • Correction and stabilization of smooth particle hydrodynamics methods with applications in metal forming simulations

    J. Bonet;S. Kulasegaram

  • A simple average nodal pressure tetrahedral element for incompressible and nearly incompressible dynamic explicit applications

    J. Bonet;A. J. Burton

  • Dynamic refinement and boundary contact forces in SPH with applications in fluid flow problems

    J. Feldman;J. Bonet

  • Mesh adaptive computation of upper and lower bounds in limit analysis

    H. Ciria;J. Peraire;J. Bonet

  • Discontinuous Galerkin Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations on Deformable Domains

    P.-O. Persson;J. Bonet;J. Peraire

  • Engineering Mechanics 2

    Dietmar Gross;Werner Hauger;Jörg Schröder;Wolfgang A. Wall

  • Finite element analysis of air supported membrane structures

    J. Bonet;R.D. Wood;J. Mahaney;P. Heywood

  • A simple orthotropic, transversely isotropic hyperelastic constitutive equation for large strain computations

    J. Bonet;A.J. Burton

  • A variational formulation based contact algorithm for rigid boundaries in two-dimensional SPH applications

    Sivakumar Kulasegaram;Javier Bonet;R. W. Lewis;M. Profit

  • An averaged nodal deformation gradient linear tetrahedral element for large strain explicit dynamic applications

    J. Bonet;H. Marriott;O. Hassan

  • A computational framework for polyconvex large strain elasticity

    Javier Bonet;Antonio J. Gil;Rogelio Ortigosa

  • Large strain viscoelastic constitutive models

    J. Bonet

  • A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation of the shallow-water equations

    Miguel Rodriguez-Paz;Javier Bonet

  • Nonlinear Solid Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis: Statics

    Javier Bonet;Antonio J. Gil;Richard D. Wood

  • Upper and lower bounds in limit analysis: Adaptive meshing strategies and discontinuous loading

    J. J. Muñoz;J. Bonet;A. Huerta;J. Peraire

  • Variational formulation for the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation of fluid and solid problems

    J. Bonet;S. Kulasegaram;M.X. Rodriguez-Paz;M. Profit

  • Remarks on tension instability of Eulerian and Lagrangian corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics (CSPH) methods

    Javier Bonet;Sivakumar Kulasegaram

  • Development of a cell centred upwind finite volume algorithm for a new conservation law formulation in structural dynamics

    Chun Hean Lee;Antonio J. Gil;Javier Bonet

  • Simulating superplastic forming

    Javier Bonet;Antonio Gil;Richard D. Wood;Rajab Said

  • Discontinuous Galerkin Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations on Deformable Domains

    Per-Olof Persson;Jaime Peraire;Javier Bonet

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Huerta
Antonio Huerta Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Roland W. Lewis
Roland W. Lewis Swansea University
Wolfgang A. Wall
Wolfgang A. Wall Technical University of Munich
Dietmar Gross
Dietmar Gross Technical University of Darmstadt
Fabrizio Scarpa
Fabrizio Scarpa University of Bristol
Ferdinando Auricchio
Ferdinando Auricchio University of Pavia
Shi-Min Hu
Shi-Min Hu Tsinghua University
Ming C. Lin
Ming C. Lin University of Maryland, College Park
Sondipon Adhikari
Sondipon Adhikari University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often opens doors to related fields that can diversify your career options. For instance, individuals interested in the technical and human interaction side might consider degrees in counseling or applied behavior analysis. Choosing accredited easiest counseling degree programs online can offer a practical pathway to enter helping professions without extended on-campus commitments.

Similar flexibility is found in behavioral sciences, where some students look for the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis. This route can enhance skills applicable in aerospace ergonomics, human factors engineering, or rehabilitation technology, bridging engineering with human behavior insights.

Another related career path involves Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which also attracts engineering students interested in healthcare technology and communication sciences. Understanding the slp acceptance rate is important for prospective students considering this field, as it can be competitive and demands strong prerequisites.

For those seeking accessible entry points, exploring easiest slp programs to get into can help identify programs that balance admissions ease with quality education. These options complement the rigorous technical training in engineering by broadening interdisciplinary career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Javier Bonet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles