World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Law 25 377 343 13 13 122 2043

Gary Edmond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary Edmond between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary Edmond published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 14 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
1995 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary Edmond: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 4
2003 0
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 7
2014 7
2015 7
2016 9
2017 10
2018 4
2019 11
2020 13
2021 8
2022 4
2023 3
2024 8
2025 6
Total 147
Download as CSV

Gary Edmond publication distribution in Law in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Law in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Edmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 46 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 262+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 262+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 3 scientists 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 0 scientists 52–56 publications: 3 scientists 57–61 publications: 2 scientists 62–66 publications: 1 scientist 67–71 publications: 6 scientists 72–76 publications: 6 scientists 77–81 publications: 10 scientists 82–86 publications: 7 scientists 87–91 publications: 10 scientists 92–96 publications: 18 scientists 97–101 publications: 15 scientists 102–106 publications: 14 scientists 107–111 publications: 12 scientists 112–116 publications: 12 scientists 117–121 publications: 14 scientists 122–126 publications: 10 scientists 127–131 publications: 9 scientists 132–136 publications: 14 scientists 137–141 publications: 12 scientists 142–146 publications: 14 scientists 147–151 publications: 8 scientists 152–156 publications: 14 scientists 157–161 publications: 5 scientists 162–166 publications: 9 scientists 167–171 publications: 15 scientists 172–176 publications: 6 scientists 177–181 publications: 9 scientists 182–186 publications: 8 scientists 187–191 publications: 16 scientists 192–196 publications: 7 scientists 197–201 publications: 6 scientists 202–206 publications: 7 scientists 207–211 publications: 11 scientists 212–216 publications: 0 scientists 217–221 publications: 5 scientists 222–226 publications: 6 scientists 227–231 publications: 10 scientists 232–236 publications: 8 scientists 237–241 publications: 5 scientists 242–246 publications: 4 scientists 247–251 publications: 2 scientists 252–256 publications: 7 scientists 257–261 publications: 5 scientists 262+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 262+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 3
42–46 1
47–51 0
52–56 3
57–61 2
62–66 1
67–71 6
72–76 6
77–81 10
82–86 7
87–91 10
92–96 18
97–101 15
102–106 14
107–111 12
112–116 12
117–121 14
122–126 10 122
127–131 9
132–136 14
137–141 12
142–146 14
147–151 8
152–156 14
157–161 5
162–166 9
167–171 15
172–176 6
177–181 9
182–186 8
187–191 16
192–196 7
197–201 6
202–206 7
207–211 11
212–216 0
217–221 5
222–226 6
227–231 10
232–236 8
237–241 5
242–246 4
247–251 2
252–256 7
257–261 5
262+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary Edmond D-index placement in Law in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Edmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 23 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 42+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 92. Most scientists, 92, have 42+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 25 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 16 scientists 21 D-Index: 23 scientists 22 D-Index: 11 scientists 23 D-Index: 20 scientists 24 D-Index: 17 scientists 25 D-Index: 23 scientists 26 D-Index: 19 scientists 27 D-Index: 19 scientists 28 D-Index: 22 scientists 29 D-Index: 14 scientists 30 D-Index: 25 scientists 31 D-Index: 25 scientists 32 D-Index: 20 scientists 33 D-Index: 24 scientists 34 D-Index: 23 scientists 35 D-Index: 12 scientists 36 D-Index: 11 scientists 37 D-Index: 15 scientists 38 D-Index: 14 scientists 39 D-Index: 4 scientists 40 D-Index: 8 scientists 41 D-Index: 9 scientists 42+ D-Index: 92 scientists
20 D-Index 42+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 16
21 23
22 11
23 20
24 17
25 23 25
26 19
27 19
28 22
29 14
30 25
31 25
32 20
33 24
34 23
35 12
36 11
37 15
38 14
39 4
40 8
41 9
42+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Gary Edmond is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily spans social sciences, focusing extensively on law with additional contributions to cognitive neuroscience, pharmacy, social psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Edmond's research output includes publications in several forensic and legal-oriented venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Forensic Science International
  • Forensic Science International Synergy
  • Science & Justice
  • Modern Law Review
  • Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

They have collaborated multiple times with coauthors such as Kristy A. Martire, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Jason Chin, Nabanita Basu, and Agnes S. Bali.

Recent research papers demonstrate a focus on forensic psychology, legal decision processes, and technology in forensic contexts. Selected works include:

  • "Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world," 2021, published in PLoS ONE
  • "An expert-novice comparison of feature choice," 2020, published in Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • "Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology," 2022, published in Forensic Science International
  • "Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework," 2020, published in Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • "Lay comprehension of statistical evidence: A novel measurement approach," 2021, published in Law and Human Behavior

Best Publications

  • Law's looking glass : expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images

    Gary Edmond;Katherine Biber;Richard Kemp;Glenn Porter

  • Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence

    Gary Edmond

  • Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners

    Gary Edmond;Alice Towler;Alice Towler;Bethany Growns;Gianni Ribeiro

  • Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals

    Gary Edmond;Jason M. Tangen;Rachel A. Searston;Itiel E. Dror

  • A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE†

    Gary Edmond;Kent Roach

  • Conjectures and exhumations: Citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts

    Gary Edmond;David Mercer

  • Litigation Life: Law-Science Knowledge Construction in (Bendectin) Mass Toxic Tort Litigation

    Gary Edmond;David Mercer

  • Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation*

    Gary Edmond;David W Mercer

  • The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety:

    Gary Edmond

  • Legal Engineering Contested Representations of Law, Science (and Non-science) and Society

    Gary Edmond

  • Model forensic science

    Gary Edmond;Bryan Found;Kristy Martire;Kaye Ballantyne

  • Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices.

    Agnes S. Bali;Gary Edmond;Kaye N. Ballantyne;Richard I. Kemp

  • Scientific literacy and the jury: reconsidering jury `competence'

    Gary Edmond;David Mercer

  • Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world.

    Kay L. Ritchie;Charlotte Cartledge;Bethany Growns;Bethany Growns;An Yan

  • The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial

    Gary Edmond;Mehera San Roque

  • Thick Decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and Reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia

    Gary Edmond

  • Constructing Miscarriages of Justice: Misunderstanding Scientific Evidence in High Profile Criminal Appeals

    Gary Edmond

  • How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers

    Gary Edmond;Kristy Martire;Richard Kemp;David Hamer

  • Rethinking Expert Opinion Evidence

    Kristy A. Martire;Gary Edmond

  • Actual innocents? Legal limitations and their implications for forensic science and medicine

    Gary Edmond

  • Supersizing Daubert Science for Litigation and Its Implications for Legal Practice and Scientific Research

    Gary Edmond

  • Atkins v The Emperor : the ‘cautious’ use of unreliable ‘expert’ opinion

    Gary Edmond;Richard Kemp;Glenn Porter;David Hamer

  • Expertise in Regulation and Law

    Gary Edmond

  • Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes Towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation

    David Mercer;Gary Edmond

Frequent Co-Authors

David White
David White University of New South Wales
Kent Roach
Kent Roach University of Toronto
Andrew G. Dempster
Andrew G. Dempster University of New South Wales
Tim Valentine
Tim Valentine Goldsmiths University of London
Linda Jeffery
Linda Jeffery Curtin University
Itiel E. Dror
Itiel E. Dror University College London
Romina Palermo
Romina Palermo University of Western Australia
Michael Lynch
Michael Lynch Cornell University
Ben R. Newell
Ben R. Newell University of New South Wales
Alice J. O'Toole
Alice J. O'Toole The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a legal education opens up diverse career paths beyond traditional law practice. Many law students and professionals are now combining their JD with specialized business knowledge to enhance their employability and leadership potential.

For those interested in management roles within firms or public organizations, the best online master's in organizational leadership programs offer valuable skills in strategic planning, change management, and team leadership. This specialization complements legal expertise, particularly for those aiming for executive or administrative positions.

Law graduates seeking to expand into the business sector should also consider mba programs in operations management. These programs develop skills in logistics, resource allocation, and process improvement, all of which are highly valued in legal consulting and compliance roles.

If you want to earn an MBA without the hurdle of standardized tests, there are many online mba no gre options available. Additionally, you can manage educational expenses by exploring an online mba under 35k, providing financial flexibility while you advance your legal and business acumen.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Edmond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles