World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 41 6949 6707 236 226 197 7032

Fei Liang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fei Liang between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fei Liang published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 20.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 74 publications in 2019. 88 of the 548 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 74. Peak 74 publications in 2019. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 43 publications 2019: 74 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 65 publications 2023: 57 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 51 publications
1999 2025

548 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fei Liang: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 3
2007 12
2008 4
2009 6
2010 6
2011 15
2012 11
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 18
2017 32
2018 43
2019 74
2020 44
2021 45
2022 65
2023 57
2024 37
2025 51
Total 548
Download as CSV

Fei Liang publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fei Liang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 197 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378 197
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Fei Liang D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fei Liang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362 41
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Interstitial P-Doped CdS with Long-Lived Photogenerated Electrons for Photocatalytic Water Splitting without Sacrificial Agents.

    Rui Shi;Hui-Fang Ye;Fei Liang;Zhuan Wang

  • A Double-Functional Additive Containing Nucleophilic Groups for High-Performance Zn-Ion Batteries.

    Unknown

  • Inorganic Colloidal Perovskite Quantum Dots for Robust Solar CO2 Reduction

    Jungang Hou;Shuyan Cao;Yunzhen Wu;Zhanming Gao

  • Correction to "M2B10O14F6 (M = Ca, Sr): Two Noncentrosymmetric Alkaline Earth Fluorooxoborates as Promising Next-Generation Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials".

    Min Luo;Fei Liang;Yunxia Song;Dan Zhao

  • Analysis and prediction of mid-IR nonlinear optical metal sulfides with diamond-like structures

    Fei Liang;Lei Kang;Zheshuai Lin;Yicheng Wu

  • Mid-Infrared Nonlinear Optical Materials Based on Metal Chalcogenides: Structure–Property Relationship

    Fei Liang;Lei Kang;Zheshuai Lin;Yicheng Wu

  • Simultaneously efficient light absorption and charge transport of phosphate and oxygen-vacancy confined in bismuth tungstate atomic layers triggering robust solar CO2 reduction

    Jungang Hou;Shuyan Cao;Yunzhen Wu;Fei Liang

  • First-Principles Design and Simulations Promote the Development of Nonlinear Optical Crystals.

    Lei Kang;Fei Liang;Xingxing Jiang;Zheshuai Lin

  • Efficient and Selective CO2 Reduction Integrated with Organic Synthesis by Solar Energy

    Qing Guo;Fei Liang;Xu-Bing Li;Yu-Ji Gao

  • Self-Supported Cedarlike Semimetallic Cu3P Nanoarrays as a 3D High-Performance Janus Electrode for Both Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution under Basic Conditions.

    Chun-Chao Hou;Qian-Qian Chen;Chuan-Jun Wang;Fei Liang

  • Ultracomfortable Hierarchical Nanonetwork for Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor

    Xin Li;You Jun Fan;You Jun Fan;Hua Yang Li;Jin Wei Cao

  • Atomically Thin Mesoporous In2O3-x/In2S3 Lateral Heterostructures Enabling Robust Broadband-Light Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting

    Jungang Hou;Shuyan Cao;Yiqing Sun;Yunzhen Wu

  • Pushing Nonlinear Optical Oxides into the Mid-Infrared Spectral Region Beyond 10 μm: Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of La3SnGa5O14

    Haichao Lan;Fei Liang;Xingxing Jiang;Cong Zhang

  • Metallic Bond-Enabled Wetting Behavior at the Liquid Ga/CuGa2 Interfaces

    Yuntao Cui;Fei Liang;Zhenze Yang;Shuo Xu

  • Molecular Construction Using (C3N3O3)3– Anions: Analysis and Prospect for Inorganic Metal Cyanurates Nonlinear Optical Materials

    Fei Liang;Lei Kang;Xinyuan Zhang;Ming-Hsien Lee

  • Perovskite-based nanocubes with simultaneously improved visible-light absorption and charge separation enabling efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction

    Jungang Hou;Shuyan Cao;Yunzhen Wu;Fei Liang

  • Morphotropic phase boundary and piezoelectric properties of (Bi1∕2Na1∕2)TiO3–(Bi1∕2K1∕2)TiO3–KNbO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics

    Guifen Fan;Wenzhong Lu;Xiaohong Wang;Fei Liang

  • Pb2BO3Br: a novel nonlinear optical lead borate bromine with a KBBF-type structure exhibiting strong nonlinear optical response

    Min Luo;Yunxia Song;Fei Liang;Ning Ye

  • N-doped carbon coated NiCo2S4 hollow nanotube as bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting

    Fang Li;Rongchen Xu;Yueming Li;Fei Liang

  • Unique Co3O4/nitrogen-doped carbon nanospheres derived from metal–organic framework: insight into their superior lithium storage capabilities and electrochemical features in high-voltage batteries

    Hongjin Xue;Zhaolin Na;Yingqiang Wu;Xuxu Wang

  • Lead-Free Tin(IV)-Based Organic-Inorganic Metal Halide Hybrids with Excellent Stability and Blue-Broadband Emission.

    Gaomin Song;Mingze Li;Yi Yang;Fei Liang

  • Metallic Co2C: A Promising Co-catalyst To Boost Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution of Colloidal Quantum Dots

    Qing Guo;Fei Liang;Xiao-Ya Gao;Qi-Chao Gan

  • Room-Temperature Ultrabroadband Photodetection with MoS 2 by Electronic-Structure Engineering Strategy.

    Ying Xie;Fei Liang;Dong Wang;Shumeng Chi

  • Co-crystal LiCl·(H3C3N3O3): a promising solar-blind nonlinear optical crystal with giant nonlinearity from coplanar π-conjugated groups.

    Fei Liang;Naizheng Wang;Xiaomeng Liu;Zheshuai Lin

  • Controlled construction of hierarchical Co1−xS structures as high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries

    Shumin Liu;Jinxian Wang;Jianwei Wang;Feifei Zhang

  • Enhanced electrochemical performances of FeOx–graphene nanocomposites as anode materials for alkaline nickel–iron batteries

    Wei Jiang;Fei Liang;Jianwei Wang;Lei Su

  • Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline composites Mo-C-N hard films

    Q. Liu;T. Liu;Q.F. Fang;F.J. Liang

  • Noncentrosymmetric Cubic Cyanurate K6Cd3(C3N3O3)4 Containing Isolated Planar π-Conjugated (C3N3O3)3- Groups.

    Mingjun Xia;Molin Zhou;Fei Liang;Xianghe Meng

  • Pushing periodic-disorder-induced phase matching into the deep-ultraviolet spectral region: theory and demonstration.

    Mingchuan Shao;Fei Liang;Haohai Yu;Huaijin Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Zheshuai Lin
Zheshuai Lin Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yicheng Wu
Yicheng Wu Tianjin University of Technology
Limin Wang
Limin Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jiyong Yao
Jiyong Yao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Huaijin Zhang
Huaijin Zhang Shandong University
Licheng Sun
Licheng Sun Royal Institute of Technology
Wen-Fu Fu
Wen-Fu Fu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Guang Zhu
Guang Zhu University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Zhong Lin Wang
Zhong Lin Wang Georgia Institute of Technology
Guotong Du
Guotong Du Jilin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA isn’t just limited to traditional, on-campus programs. Many universities now offer flexible online alternatives, making advanced study more accessible than ever. For those looking to fast-track their education, a master's degree in 6 months online can be an efficient pathway to specialized roles.

Certifications are also increasingly popular, with many certifications that pay well serving as quick entry points into high-demand technology fields. These options can often be completed far faster than a degree and still lead to rewarding careers.

Flexibility is key—especially for non-traditional students. There are numerous online degrees for single moms, offering adaptable schedules and support, helping parents fit study around their busy lives. You’ll also find many college classes online that last as little as six weeks, which can help you quickly gain credit or brush up on new skills.

These flexible learning opportunities ensure that anyone, regardless of their circumstances, can access quality education and unlock new career possibilities in engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Fei Liang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles