World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 47 1395 1288 1 1 171 6636

Abdullah H. Sofiyev publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abdullah H. Sofiyev between 2001 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abdullah H. Sofiyev published across 21 years, from 2001 to 2021, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 18 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications
2001 2021

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abdullah H. Sofiyev: publications per year, 2001 to 2021
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 3
2003 7
2004 4
2005 2
2006 7
2007 4
2008 2
2009 5
2010 8
2011 11
2012 8
2013 9
2014 15
2015 14
2016 10
2017 11
2018 5
2019 10
2020 7
2021 11
Total 155
Download as CSV

Abdullah H. Sofiyev publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdullah H. Sofiyev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 171 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133 171
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Abdullah H. Sofiyev D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdullah H. Sofiyev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70 47
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Mathematical analysis
  • Geometry

His primary areas of study are Galerkin method, Buckling, Shell, Conical surface and Material properties. His Galerkin method research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mechanics, Dimensionless quantity, Geometry, Critical load and Volume fraction. His Buckling study deals with Functionally graded material intersecting with Thin shells.

His Shell research incorporates themes from Mathematical analysis and Superposition principle. His study looks at the relationship between Conical surface and topics such as Structural engineering, which overlap with Instability. His Material properties research includes elements of Torsional vibration, Shear and Foundation.

His most cited work include:

  • The vibration and stability behavior of freely supported FGM conical shells subjected to external pressure (112 citations)
  • The stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells under linearly increasing dynamic torsional loading (103 citations)
  • Buckling analysis of FGM circular shells under combined loads and resting on the Pasternak type elastic foundation (76 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Galerkin method, Conical surface, Composite material, Orthotropic material and Buckling are his primary areas of study. His Galerkin method study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Mathematical analysis, Material properties, Structural engineering, Shell and Mechanics. His Shell research includes themes of Tension and Critical load.

His work carried out in the field of Mechanics brings together such families of science as Dynamic load testing and Differential equation. The various areas that Abdullah H. Sofiyev examines in his Conical surface study include Shear, Boundary value problem, Functionally graded material and Nonlinear system. His research on Composite material frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Dimensionless quantity.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Galerkin method (76.06%)
  • Conical surface (68.31%)
  • Composite material (54.93%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Galerkin method (76.06%)
  • Conical surface (68.31%)
  • Composite material (54.93%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Abdullah H. Sofiyev focuses on Galerkin method, Conical surface, Composite material, Buckling and Carbon nanotube. His Galerkin method research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Volume fraction, Mechanics and Mathematical analysis. His Mechanics research integrates issues from Shell, Boundary value problem and Differential equation.

His work deals with themes such as Shear and Composite number, which intersect with Conical surface. In his articles, Abdullah H. Sofiyev combines various disciplines, including Buckling and Hydrostatic pressure. In his research on the topic of Carbon nanotube, Partial differential equation is strongly related with Material properties.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Review of research on the vibration and buckling of the FGM conical shells (44 citations)
  • On the vibration and stability of FGM cylindrical shells under external pressures with mixed boundary conditions by using FOSDT (29 citations)
  • Analytical solution of stability of FG-CNTRC conical shells under external pressures (24 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Mathematical analysis
  • Structural engineering

Abdullah H. Sofiyev mostly deals with Galerkin method, Conical surface, Stability, Mechanics and Composite material. His study in Galerkin method is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Plate theory, Equations of motion and Bending vibration. His Conical surface study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Buckling.

His Buckling research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Distribution, Numerical analysis and Dimensionless quantity. The study of Mechanics is intertwined with the study of Axial load in a number of ways. His work in the fields of Structural engineering, such as Foundation, intersects with other areas such as Orthotropic material.

Best Publications

  • Review of research on the vibration and buckling of the FGM conical shells

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • The vibration and stability behavior of freely supported FGM conical shells subjected to external pressure

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • The stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells under linearly increasing dynamic torsional loading

    A.H. Sofiyev;E. Schnack

  • The vibration and buckling of sandwich cylindrical shells covered by different coatings subjected to the hydrostatic pressure

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Buckling analysis of FGM circular shells under combined loads and resting on the Pasternak type elastic foundation

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Torsional vibration and buckling of the cylindrical shell with functionally graded coatings surrounded by an elastic medium

    A.H. Sofiyev;A.H. Sofiyev;N. Kuruoglu;N. Kuruoglu

  • Dynamic buckling of functionally graded cylindrical thin shells under non-periodic impulsive loading

    A. H. Sofiyev

  • The nonlinear vibration of orthotropic functionally graded cylindrical shells surrounded by an elastic foundation within first order shear deformation theory

    A.H. Sofiyev;D. Hui;V.C. Haciyev;H. Erdem

  • Buckling and vibration of shear deformable functionally graded orthotropic cylindrical shells under external pressures

    A.H. Sofiyev;N. Kuruoglu

  • The non-linear vibration of FGM truncated conical shells

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • The buckling of FGM truncated conical shells subjected to axial compressive load and resting on Winkler–Pasternak foundations

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Thermoelastic stability of functionally graded truncated conical shells

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Thermal buckling of FGM shells resting on a two-parameter elastic foundation

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • The buckling of FGM truncated conical shells subjected to combined axial tension and hydrostatic pressure

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Large amplitude vibration of FGM orthotropic cylindrical shells interacting with the nonlinear Winkler elastic foundation

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Non-linear buckling behavior of FGM truncated conical shells subjected to axial load

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • The free vibration of sandwich truncated conical shells containing functionally graded layers within the shear deformation theory

    A.H. Sofiyev;E. Osmancelebioglu

  • Modified Young’s moduli of nano-materials taking into account the scale effects and vacancies

    A. N. Alizada;A. H. Sofiyev

  • Nonlinear free vibration of shear deformable orthotropic functionally graded cylindrical shells

    A.H. Sofiyev

  • Torsional vibration and stability of functionally graded orthotropic cylindrical shells on elastic foundations

    A. M. Najafov;A. H. Sofiyev;N. Kuruoglu

  • The stability of compositionally graded ceramic–metal cylindrical shells under aperiodic axial impulsive loading

    A.H. Sofiyev

Frequent Co-Authors

David Hui
David Hui University of New Orleans
Francesco Tornabene
Francesco Tornabene University of Salento
Rossana Dimitri
Rossana Dimitri University of Salento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities in engineering and beyond. For example, those interested in helping others might consider programs tailored to specific populations, such as a veteran friendly online speech pathology degree. These specialized options highlight the importance of choosing a degree that aligns with your personal goals and community needs.

Additionally, accelerated programs like the 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs offer a fast-tracked path to earning your degree, making them ideal for students eager to enter the workforce sooner without compromising education quality.

Career pathways connected to engineering can also lead toward specialized roles such as profiling in law enforcement. Understanding the fbi profiler salary and job outlook can provide insight into how analytical and technical skills gained in engineering may translate into such professions.

Finally, if your interests lean toward mental health and human behavior, exploring the different types of counseling degrees available online may complement your engineering background by adding valuable interdisciplinary expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Abdullah H. Sofiyev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles