World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
12066
World Ranking
2952
National Ranking
1159

Eugene F. Stoermer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene F. Stoermer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Eugene F. Stoermer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene F. Stoermer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene F. Stoermer was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States during their academic career. The research work focused on environmental and earth sciences, particularly contributing to the concept of the Anthropocene epoch.

The scientist's recent publication record includes the paper titled The 'Anthropocene' (2000), published in 2021 in the venue The "anthropocene: Politik - economics - society - science. This paper was co-authored with Paul J. Crutzen.

  • The 'Anthropocene' (2000), 2021, The "anthropocene: Politik - economics - society - science

Co-authorship involved frequent collaboration with the following researchers:

  • Paul J. Crutzen

Publications appeared in the following venue:

  • The "anthropocene: Politik - economics - society - science

Best Publications

  • The diatoms : applications for the environmental and earth sciences

    John P. Smol;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Modification of the biogeochemical cycle of silica with eutrophication

    DJ Conley;CL Schelske;EF Stoermer

  • Eutrophication, Silica Depletion, and Predicted Changes in Algal Quality in Lake Michigan

    Claire L. Schelske;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • The Diatoms: Diatoms as indicators in marine and estuarine environments

    John P. Smol;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Diatoms as indicators of lake eutrophication

    Roland I. Hall;John P. Smol

  • Early eutrophication in the lower great lakes

    Claire L. Schelske;Eugene F. Stoermer;Daniel J. Conley;John A. Robbins

  • Estim ation of intracellular carbon and silica content of diatoms from natural assemblages using morphometric techniques1

    Linda M. Sicko-Goad;Claire L. Schelske;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • ECOLOGICAL, EVOLUTIONARY, AND SYSTEMATIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DIATOM LIFE HISTORIES

    Mark B. Edlund;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Diatoms and lake acidity

    J P Smol;R W Battarbee;R B Davis;J Merilainen

  • PHOSPHORUS, SILICA, AND EUTROPHICATION OF LAKE MICHIGAN.

    C.L. Schelske;E.F. Stoermer

  • The importance of zooplankton‐protozoan trophic couplings in Lake Michigan

    Hunter J. Carrick;Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Eugene F. Stoermer;Robert G. Wetzel

  • QUANTITATIVE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BENTHIC ALGAL COMMUNITIES ALONG A DEPTH GRADIENT IN LAKE MICHIGAN1,2

    R. Jan Stevenson;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • OXYGEN ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION BETWEEN DIATOMACEOUS SILICA AND WATER

    Mark E. Brandriss;James R. O’Neil;Mark B. Edlund;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • QUANTITATIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING A REPRESENTATIVE ALGAL SAMPLE COUNT1

    Janice L. Pappas;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Phosphorus enrichment, silica utilization, and biogeochemical silica depletion in the Great Lakes

    Claire L. Schelske;Eugene F. Stoermer;Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Mark Haibach

  • AN ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING THE RECENT HISTORY OF LAKE ONTARIO BASED ON SILICEOUS ALGAL MICROFOSSILS PRESERVED IN THE SEDIMENTS1,2

    Eugene F. Stoermer;J. A. Wolin;Claire L. Schelske;D. J. Conley

  • Importance of Picoplankton in Lake Superior

    Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Linda Sicko-Goad;Donald Scavia;Eugene F. Stoermer

  • Diatom resting cell rejuvenation and formation: time course, species records and distribution

    L. Sicko-Goad;E.F. Stoermer;J.P. Kociolek

  • REJUVENATION OF MELOSIRA GRANULATA (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) RESTING CELLS FROM THE ANOXIC SEDIMENTS OF DOUGLAS LAKE, MICHIGAN. I. LIGHT MIGROSCOPY AND 14C UPTAKE 1

    L. Sicko-Goad;Eugene F. Stoermer;G. Fahnenstiel

  • FINE STRUCTURE OF THE DIATOM AMPHIPLEURA PELLUCIDA. II. CYTOPLASMIC FINE STRUCTURE AND FRUSTULE FORMATION

    E. F. Stoermer;H. S. Pankratz;C. C. Bowen

  • SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF BENTHIC DIATOMS IN NORTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN

    John C. Kingston;Rex L. Lowe;Eugene F. Stoermer;Theodore B. Ladewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Claire L. Schelske
Claire L. Schelske University of Florida
John P. Smol
John P. Smol Queen's University
Daniel J. Conley
Daniel J. Conley Lund University
R. Jan Stevenson
R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University
Rex L. Lowe
Rex L. Lowe Bowling Green State University
Gary L. Fahnenstiel
Gary L. Fahnenstiel Michigan Technological University
John A. Robbins
John A. Robbins Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
Euan D. Reavie
Euan D. Reavie University of Minnesota, Duluth
Donald Scavia
Donald Scavia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey D. Palmer
Jeffrey D. Palmer Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals look into education doctoral programs without dissertation, which offer advanced leadership skills applicable in environmental education and policy roles.

Educators aiming to advance their qualifications might consider an eds to edd bridge program, seamlessly elevating their credentials while continuing professional work in environmental advocacy and education sectors.

For those inclined towards community and social impact, online dsw programs in social work provide an avenue to integrate environmental justice with social work practices, addressing challenges like environmental inequality and public health.

Additionally, students seeking flexible and budget-friendly options might explore the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs allow for customizable curricula, incorporating environmental sciences alongside other disciplines to meet diverse career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene F. Stoermer

Recently Published Articles