World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7997
World Ranking
6709
National Ranking
167

Erik Cammeraat publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Cammeraat sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 229 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erik Cammeraat D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Cammeraat sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The effect of land use on runoff and soil erosion rates under Mediterranean conditions

    C. Kosmas;N. Danalatos;L.H. Cammeraat;M. Chabart

  • Scale dependent thresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in southeast Spain

    Unknown

  • Slope stability and erosion control : ecotechnological solutions

    J.E. Norris;A. Stokes;S.B. Mickovski;E. Cammeraat

  • A review of two strongly contrasting geomorphological systems within the context of scale

    Unknown

  • The environmental impacts of river sand mining

    Unknown

  • The fate of soil organic carbon upon erosion, transport and deposition in agricultural landscapes — A review of different concepts

    F.M.S.A. Kirkels;L.H. Cammeraat;N.J. Kuhn

  • Erosion and terrace failure due to agricultural land abandonment in a semi‐arid environment

    Unknown

  • Scaling up processes and models from the field plot to the watershed and regional areas.

    M.J. Kirkby;A.C. Imeson;G.J.J. Bergkamp;L.H. Cammeraat

  • The evolution and significance of soil–vegetation patterns following land abandonment and fire in Spain

    Unknown

  • Identification of vulnerable areas for gully erosion under different scenarios of land abandonment in Southeast Spain

    J.P. Lesschen;K. Kok;P.H. Verburg;L.H. Cammeraat

  • Soil aggregation and the stabilization of organic carbon as affected by erosion and deposition

    Xiang Wang;Erik L.H. Cammeraat;Chiara Cerli;Karsten Kalbitz

  • Vegetation succession and its consequences for slope stability in SE Spain.

    Unknown

  • Modelling runoff and erosion for a semi-arid catchment using a multi-scale approach based on hydrological connectivity

    Unknown

  • The impact of ants on mineral soil properties and processes at different spatial scales

    E. L. H. Cammeraat;A. C. Risch

  • How vegetation reinforces soil on slopes

    Alexia Stokes;Joanne E. Norris;L. P. H. van Beek;Thom Bogaard

  • Reviewing the Impact of Land Use and Land-Use Change on Moisture Recycling and Precipitation Patterns

    Sofie A. te Wierik;Erik L. H. Cammeraat;Joyeeta Gupta;Yael A. Artzy-Randrup

  • Observation and simulation of root reinforcement on abandoned Mediterranean slopes

    L.P.H. van Beek;J. Wint;L.H. Cammeraat;J.P. Edwards

  • Vegetation Succession and its Consequences for Slope Stability in SE Spain

    Unknown

  • Development of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation and soil properties after land abandonment in a semi-arid ecosystem

    Unknown

  • Impact of secondary vegetation succession on soil quality in a humid Mediterranean landscape

    R.L. van Hall;L.H. Cammeraat;S.D. Keesstra;M. Zorn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners seek flexible options like the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get, which often include interdisciplinary environmental programs designed for accessibility and practical skills. These pathways can be a great start for careers focused on sustainability and conservation.

Specialized fields such as Geoscience and Geology also offer robust online options. Choosing from the geoscience online degree programs equips students with a deep understanding of earth processes, critical for roles in environmental consulting and resource management.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which supports environmental data analysis and mapping. Accessing education through the best gis schools ensures specialized training helpful in urban planning, wildlife management, and disaster response.

Professionals aiming to advance into policy or administrative roles might consider accelerated programs like the one year mpa. These degrees provide leadership skills relevant to environmental governance and nonprofit management, helping to drive impactful change.