World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 61 1911 1720 947 837 121 12392

Eileen T. O'Toole publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eileen T. O'Toole between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eileen T. O'Toole published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2014. 5 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1990 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eileen T. O'Toole: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 3
1993 2
1994 4
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 4
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 7
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 3
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 7
2014 8
2015 3
2016 8
2017 5
2018 5
2019 4
2020 6
2021 7
2022 3
2023 1
2024 1
2025 4
Total 134
Download as CSV

Eileen T. O'Toole publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eileen T. O'Toole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 121 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 121
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Eileen T. O'Toole D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eileen T. O'Toole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 61
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Eileen T. O'Toole is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions across several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Genetics, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

The scientist's work addresses diverse topics, including:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Genetic and kidney cyst diseases
  • Chromosomal and genetic variations
  • Fetal and pediatric neurological disorders
  • Genomics and chromatin dynamics
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Cellular transport and secretion

O'Toole has published extensively, with a significant number of their articles appearing in venues such as UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Biology of the Cell, Current Biology, and Nature Communications. Their recurrent publication venues indicate active engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed platforms.

Frequent collaborators include Chad G. Pearson, Garry Morgan, Alexander J. Stemm-Wolf, Mark Winey, and Nalini R. Rao, pointing to collaborative research efforts in their field.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by O'Toole include:

  • "Mechanisms of microtubule dynamics and force generation examined with computational modeling and electron cryotomography," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Pulse-Chase Proteomics of the App Knockin Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease Reveals that Synaptic Dysfunction Originates in Presynaptic Terminals," 2020, Cell Systems
  • "Comprehensive Chromosome End Remodeling during Programmed DNA Elimination," 2020, Current Biology
  • "Beat-by-Beat Cardiomyocyte T-Tubule Deformation Drives Tubular Content Exchange," 2020, Circulation Research
  • "Basal bodies bend in response to ciliary forces," 2022, Molecular Biology of the Cell

Best Publications

  • Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle.

    M Winey;C L Mamay;E T O'Toole;D N Mastronarde

  • A Selective Activity-Dependent Requirement for Dynamin 1 in Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis

    Shawn M. Ferguson;Gabor Brasnjo;Mitsuko Hayashi;Markus Wölfel

  • Piecemeal Microautophagy of Nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Paul Roberts;Sharon Moshitch-Moshkovitz;Erik Kvam;Eileen O'Toole

  • Centriole assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Laurence Pelletier;Eileen O'Toole;Anne Schwager;Anthony A Hyman

  • Ktu/PF13 is required for cytoplasmic pre-assembly of axonemal dyneins

    Heymut Omran;Daisuke Kobayashi;Daisuke Kobayashi;Heike Olbrich;Tatsuya Tsukahara

  • Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast

    Zuzana Storchová;Amanda Breneman;Jessica Cande;Joshua Dunn

  • Recruitment of Endophilin to Clathrin-Coated Pit Necks Is Required for Efficient Vesicle Uncoating after Fission

    Ira Milosevic;Silvia Giovedi;Xuelin Lou;Andrea Raimondi

  • Yeast Bim1p promotes the G1-specific dynamics of microtubules.

    Jennifer S. Tirnauer;Eileen O'Toole;Lisbeth Berrueta;Barbara E. Bierer

  • High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Eileen T. O’Toole;Mark Winey;J. Richard McIntosh

  • Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells.

    K L McDonald;E T O'Toole;D N Mastronarde;J R McIntosh

  • β-Catenin is a Nek2 substrate involved in centrosome separation

    Shirin Bahmanyar;Daniel D. Kaplan;Daniel D. Kaplan;Jennifer G. DeLuca;Jennifer G. DeLuca;Thomas H. Giddings

  • Overlapping Role of Dynamin Isoforms in Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis

    Andrea Raimondi;Shawn M. Ferguson;Xuelin Lou;Moritz Armbruster;Moritz Armbruster

  • Conventional transmission electron microscopy

    Mark Winey;Janet B. Meehl;Eileen T. O'Toole;Thomas H. Giddings

  • Zebrafish Ciliopathy Screen Plus Human Mutational Analysis Identifies C21orf59 and CCDC65 Defects as Causing Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

    Christina Austin-Tse;Jan Halbritter;Maimoona B Zariwala;Renée M. Gilberti

  • Electrotonic coupling of excitable and nonexcitable cells in the heart revealed by optogenetics.

    TA Quinn;P Camelliti;EA Rog-Zielinska;U Siedlecka

  • Morphologically distinct microtubule ends in the mitotic centrosome of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Eileen T. O'Toole;Kent L. McDonald;Jana Mäntler;J. Richard McIntosh

  • Chromosome congression by Kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules.

    Melissa K. Gardner;David C. Bouck;Leocadia V. Paliulis;Janet B. Meehl

  • Organization of Interphase Microtubules in Fission Yeast Analyzed by Electron Tomography

    Johanna L. Höög;Cindi Schwartz;Angela T. Noon;Eileen T. O'Toole

  • Components of a "dynein regulatory complex" are located at the junction between the radial spokes and the dynein arms in Chlamydomonas flagella.

    Lynne C. Gardner;Eileen O'Toole;Catherine A. Perrone;Thomas Giddings

  • Katanin Disrupts the Microtubule Lattice and Increases Polymer Number in C. elegans Meiosis

    Martin Srayko;Eileen T. O'Toole;Anthony A. Hyman;Thomas Müller-Reichert

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Winey
Mark Winey University of California, Davis
J. Richard McIntosh
J. Richard McIntosh University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas H. Giddings
Thomas H. Giddings University of Colorado Boulder
Mary E. Porter
Mary E. Porter University of Minnesota
Kent L. McDonald
Kent L. McDonald University of California, Berkeley
Anthony A. Hyman
Anthony A. Hyman Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
Pietro De Camilli
Pietro De Camilli Yale University
Susan K. Dutcher
Susan K. Dutcher Washington University in St. Louis
Keith Gull
Keith Gull University of Oxford
Edward D. Salmon
Edward D. Salmon University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about molecular biology, there are many related online degree programs that can complement your studies and expand your career opportunities. For example, an online masters in psychology can provide invaluable insights into the biological foundations of behavior and cognition—skills that are highly relevant for roles in research or healthcare.

Those interested in bridging molecular science with mental health can explore fast-track pathways. Programs like fast track mental health counseling offer accelerated options for combining scientific knowledge with clinical practice. This is especially useful in today’s fast-paced job market.

Forensic science is another field where molecular biology intersects with psychology. Want to know what your future earning potential might be? Check out how much does a forensic psychologist make to learn more about this growing field.

If your interests lie in child development, consider an online masters in child psychology. This path blends molecular, genetic, and behavioral studies, preparing you for careers in education, counseling, or clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Eileen T. O'Toole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles