World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
19927
World Ranking
7692
National Ranking
562

Elmar Schiebel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Schiebel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 153 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Elmar Schiebel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Schiebel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elmar Schiebel is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a specialization in several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Genetics, Structural Biology, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics within their field. Notable main topics of research include:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Elmar Schiebel frequently publishes in several journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Nature Communications
  • Open Biology
  • The EMBO Journal
  • BioEssays
  • The Journal of Cell Biology

Their recent selected papers demonstrate a consistent focus on cellular components related to microtubule organization and centrosome function:

  • Microtubule nucleation: The waltz between γ-tubulin ring complex and associated proteins, 2020, Current Opinion in Cell Biology
  • CEP44 ensures the formation of bona fide centriole wall, a requirement for the centriole-to-centrosome conversion, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Modular assembly of the principal microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC, 2022, Nature Communications
  • The Centrosome Linker and Its Role in Cancer and Genetic Disorders, 2020, Trends in Molecular Medicine
  • The structure of the γ-TuRC: a 25-years-old molecular puzzle, 2020, Current Opinion in Structural Biology

The scientist collaborates regularly with a number of coauthors, with notable frequent collaborators including:

  • Annett Neuner
  • Martin Würtz
  • Stefan Pfeffer
  • Bram J. A. Vermeulen
  • Erik Župa

Best Publications

  • A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes.

    Carsten Janke;Maria M. Magiera;Nicole Rathfelder;Christof Taxis

  • Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR‐based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines

    Michael Knop;Katja Siegers;Gislene Pereira;Wolfgang Zachariae

  • Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora Kinase-INCENP) Complex Promotes Chromosome Bi-orientation by Altering Kinetochore-Spindle Pole Connections

    Tomoyuki U. Tanaka;Tomoyuki U. Tanaka;Najma Rachidi;Carsten Janke;Gislene Pereira

  • The binding cascade of SecB to SecA to SecY/E mediates preprotein targeting to the E. coli plasma membrane.

    Franz-Ulrich Hartl;Stewart Lecker;Elmar Schiebel;Joseph P. Hendrick

  • The purified E. coli integral membrane protein SecY/E is sufficient for reconstitution of SecA-dependent precursor protein translocation.

    Lorna Brundage;Joseph P. Hendrick;Elmar Schiebel;Arnold J.M. Driessen

  • ΔμH+ and ATP function at different steps of the catalytic cycle of preprotein translocase

    Elmar Schiebel;Arnold J.M. Driessen;Franz-Ulrich Hartl;William Wickner

  • A novel protein complex promoting formation of functional alpha- and gamma-tubulin.

    Silke Geissler;Katja Siegers;Elmar Schiebel

  • The Bub2p Spindle Checkpoint Links Nuclear Migration with Mitotic Exit

    Gislene Pereira;Thomas Höfken;Joan Grindlay;Claire Manson

  • Separase Regulates INCENP-Aurora B Anaphase Spindle Function Through Cdc14

    Gislene Pereira;Elmar Schiebel

  • Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p–Bub2p checkpoint protein complex

    Gislene Pereira;Tomoyuki U. Tanaka;Kim Nasmyth;Elmar Schiebel

  • Spc98p and Spc97p of the yeast γ‐tubulin complex mediate binding to the spindle pole body via their interaction with Spc110p

    Michael Knop;Elmar Schiebel

  • Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition

    Stephanie B M Miller;Chi-Ting Ho;Juliane Winkler;Maria Khokhrina

  • Tandem fluorescent protein timers for in vivo analysis of protein dynamics

    Anton Khmelinskii;Philipp J Keller;Anna Bartosik;Anna Bartosik;Matthias Meurer;Matthias Meurer

  • Compartmentation of protein folding in vivo: sequestration of non‐native polypeptide by the chaperonin–GimC system

    Katja Siegers;Thomas Waldmann;Michel R. Leroux;Katrin Grein

  • The budding yeast proteins Spc24p and Spc25p interact with Ndc80p and Nuf2p at the kinetochore and are important for kinetochore clustering and checkpoint control

    Carsten Janke;Jennifer Ortiz;Johannes Lechner;Anna Shevchenko

  • The spindle pole body component Spc98p interacts with the gamma-tubulin-like Tub4p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the sites of microtubule attachment

    Silke Geissler;Gislene Pereira;Anne Spang;Michael Knop

  • The calcium-binding protein cell division cycle 31 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a component of the half bridge of the spindle pole body.

    Anne Spang;Iain Courtney;Ursel Fackler;Monika Matzner

  • Receptors determine the cellular localization of a gamma-tubulin complex and thereby the site of microtubule formation.

    Michael Knop;Elmar Schiebel

  • The spindle pole body component Spc97p interacts with the γ‐tubulin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and functions in microtubule organization and spindle pole body duplication

    Michael Knop;Gislene Pereira;Silke Geissler;Katrin Grein

  • In search of a function for centrins

    Elmar Schiebel;Michel Bornens

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Knop
Michael Knop Heidelberg University
Anne Spang
Anne Spang University of Basel
Carsten Janke
Carsten Janke Institute Curie
Mike Heilemann
Mike Heilemann Goethe University Frankfurt
Thomas Ruppert
Thomas Ruppert Heidelberg University
Andrej Shevchenko
Andrej Shevchenko Max Planck Society
Claude Antony
Claude Antony Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Rebecca C. Wade
Rebecca C. Wade Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
Kim Nasmyth
Kim Nasmyth University of Oxford
Stefan W. Hell
Stefan W. Hell Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elmar Schiebel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles