World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
16663
World Ranking
5129
National Ranking
1884

Edwin P. Maurer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin P. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Edwin P. Maurer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin P. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin P. Maurer is affiliated with Santa Clara University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work focuses on subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Soil Science, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their main research topics cover Climate variability and models, Climate change impacts on agriculture, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Agricultural risk and resilience, Agricultural Innovations and Practices, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Cryospheric studies and observations.

Notable recent publications by Maurer include:

  • The Mesoamerican mid-summer drought: the impact of its definition on occurrences and recent changes (2022, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences)
  • Understanding Differences in California Climate Projections Produced by Dynamical and Statistical Downscaling (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)

Other highly cited papers related to their field but authored by frequent collaborators include:
  • Towards smallholder food and water security: Climate variability in the context of multiple livelihood hazards in Nicaragua (2021, World Development)
  • Recent evidence for warmer and drier growing seasons in climate sensitive regions of Central America from multiple global datasets (2021, International Journal of Climatology)
  • Replication Data for: Towards Smallholder Food and Water Security: Climate Variability in the Context of Multiple Livelihood Hazards in Nicaragua (2020, Harvard Dataverse)

Frequent coauthors working alongside Maurer are Iris T. Stewart, Christopher M. Bacon, William A. Sundstrom, Lisa C. Kelley, and Kenneth Joseph.

Maurer's research has appeared in multiple publication venues including World Development, International Journal of Climatology, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, and Harvard Dataverse.

Best Publications

  • A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States*

    E. P. Maurer;A. W. Wood;J. C. Adam;D. P. Lettenmaier

  • Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California

    Katharine Hayhoe;Daniel Cayan;Christopher B. Field;Peter C. Frumhoff

  • Long‐range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States

    Andrew W. Wood;Edwin P. Maurer;Arun Kumar;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • Climate change scenarios for the California region

    Daniel R. Cayan;Daniel R. Cayan;Edwin P. Maurer;Michael D. Dettinger;Michael D. Dettinger;Mary Tyree

  • A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States: Update and Extensions*

    Ben Livneh;Eric A. Rosenberg;Chiyu Lin;Bart Nijssen

  • Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping

    B. L. Thrasher;E. P. Maurer;C. McKellar;P. B. Duffy

  • Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods

    Edwin P. Maurer;Hugo G. Hidalgo

  • Fine‐resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies

    Edwin P. Maurer;Levi Brekke;Tom Pruitt;Philip B. Duffy

  • Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere.

    Joshua J. Lawler;Sarah L. Shafer;Denis White;Peter Kareiva

  • Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios

    Edwin P. Maurer

  • A Long-Term Hydrologically-Based Data Set of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States

    Edwin P. Maurer;A. W. Wood;J. C. Adam;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California

    Edwin P. Maurer;H. G. Hidalgo;T. Das;M. D. Dettinger;M. D. Dettinger

  • Regional climate change projections for the Northeast USA

    Katharine Hayhoe;Cameron P Wake;Bruce T. Anderson;Xin-Zhong Liang

  • Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change

    David W. Pierce;Daniel R. Cayan;Edwin P. Maurer;John T. Abatzoglou

  • Evaluation of the snow-covered area data product from MODIS

    Edwin P. Maurer;Joshua D. Rhoads;Ralph O. Dubayah;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • Applied climate-change analysis: the climate wizard tool.

    Evan H. Girvetz;Evan H. Girvetz;Chris Zganjar;George T. Raber;Edwin P. Maurer

  • Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change

    Levi D. Brekke;Edwin P. Maurer;Jamie D. Anderson;Michael D. Dettinger

  • Detection of Intensification in Global- and Continental-Scale Hydrological Cycles: Temporal Scale of Evaluation

    Alan D. Ziegler;Justin Sheffield;Edwin P. Maurer;Bart Nijssen

  • The Sensitivity of California Water Resources to Climate Change Scenarios

    Sebastian Vicuna;Edwin P. Maurer;Brian Joyce;John A. Dracup

  • Uncertainty in projections of streamflow changes due to climate change in California

    Edwin P. Maurer;Philip B. Duffy

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of California, Los Angeles
Daniel R. Cayan
Daniel R. Cayan University of California, San Diego
Michael D. Dettinger
Michael D. Dettinger Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Darren L. Ficklin
Darren L. Ficklin Indiana University
Andrew W. Wood
Andrew W. Wood National Center for Atmospheric Research
Justin Sheffield
Justin Sheffield University of Southampton
David W. Pierce
David W. Pierce University of California, San Diego
Hugo G. Hidalgo
Hugo G. Hidalgo University of Costa Rica
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Norman L. Miller
Norman L. Miller University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy or public service, pursuing online MPA degrees can provide valuable skills in management and governance. These programs are tailored for professionals aiming to influence environmental regulations and sustainable development initiatives.

Environmental issues also involve understanding societal impacts, making a bachelors degree in sociology online a relevant path. This degree offers insights into social behaviors and structures affecting environmental policies and community responses to ecological challenges.

For educators and researchers focusing on environmental education or advancing academic careers, the demand for flexible graduate programs is growing. Many seek edd no dissertation options to balance professional commitments while earning advanced credentials. Furthermore, transitioning from a specialist certification to a doctoral level can be streamlined through the best online eds to edd programs, supporting career advancement without disrupting daily responsibilities.

Exploring these interconnected pathways can enhance your expertise and expand career prospects in the evolving landscape of environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin P. Maurer

Trending Scientists