World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
44
Citations
5103
World Ranking
19333
National Ranking
7895

Don M. Wojchowski publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don M. Wojchowski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 138 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Don M. Wojchowski D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don M. Wojchowski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Don M. Wojchowski is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, medicine, and immunology and microbiology. Key subfields of their work include molecular biology, immunology, hematology, physiology, and spectroscopy.

The scientist's main topics of study focus on erythrocyte function and pathophysiology, advanced proteomics techniques and applications, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, erythropoietin and anemia treatment, protein tyrosine phosphatases, galectins and cancer biology, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer.

Frequent publication venues for Wojchowski include:

  • Experimental Hematology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cellular Signalling
  • Blood
  • International Journal of Molecular Biology Open Access

Notable recent papers showcase the scope of their research interests and collaborations:

  • "Phospho-proteomic discovery of novel signal transducers including thioredoxin-interacting protein as mediators of erythropoietin-dependent human erythropoiesis" (2020, Experimental Hematology)
  • "Phospho-PTM proteomic discovery of novel EPO-modulated kinases and phosphatases, including PTPN18 as a positive regulator of EPOR/JAK2 Signaling" (2020, Cellular Signalling)
  • "Affinity-Bead Assisted Mass Spectrometry (Affi-BAMS): A Multiplexed Microarray Platform for Targeted Proteomics" (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • "Assessment and streamlined preparation of low-cytotoxicity lentiviral vectors for mobilized human hematopoietic stem cell transduction" (2020, Experimental Hematology)
  • "Affi-BAMS™: A Robust Targeted Proteomics Microarray Platform to Measure Histone Post-Translational Modifications" (2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

Collaborations are evident from frequent co-authors who have appeared in multiple publications with Wojchowski. These include:

  • Paul Toran
  • Matthew A. Held
  • Emily Greenfest-Allen
  • Christian J. Stoeckert
  • Matthew P. Stokes

The range and nature of the scientist's work reflect an integration of proteomic technologies and molecular signaling mechanisms, particularly related to erythropoiesis and hematopoietic system regulation. The integration of targeted proteomics platforms and kinase/phosphatase signaling pathways forms a consistent theme across their published research.

Best Publications

  • Signal transduction in the erythropoietin receptor system.

    Don M. Wojchowski;Richard C. Gregory;Chris P. Miller;Ajay K. Pandit

  • Functional interaction of GATA1 with erythroid Kruppel-like factor and Sp1 at defined erythroid promoters

    Richard C. Gregory;Debra J. Taxman;Dhaya Seshasayee;Margaret H. Kensinger

  • Inhibition of erythropoietin-induced mitogenesis by a kinase-deficient form of Jak2.

    Hongming Zhuang;S. V. Patel;Tong-Chuan He;S. K. Sonsteby

  • Emerging EPO and EPO receptor regulators and signal transducers.

    David Kuhrt;Don M. Wojchowski;Don M. Wojchowski

  • Signals for stress erythropoiesis are integrated via an erythropoietin receptor–phosphotyrosine-343–Stat5 axis

    Madhu P. Menon;Vinit Karur;Olga Bogacheva;Oleg Bogachev

  • Proliferative action of erythropoietin is associated with rapid protein tyrosine phosphorylation in responsive B6SUt.EP cells.

    F W Quelle;D M Wojchowski

  • Association of the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3- kinase with an essential erythropoietin receptor subdomain

    TC He;H Zhuang;N Jiang;Waterfield

  • Erythropoietin-induced recruitment of Shc via a receptor phosphotyrosine-independent, Jak2-associated pathway

    Tong-Chuan He;Ning Jiang;Hongming Zhuang;Don M. Wojchowski

  • Mutations in the WSAWSE and cytosolic domains of the erythropoietin receptor affect signal transduction and ligand binding and internalization.

    D E Quelle;F W Quelle;D M Wojchowski

  • Localized cytosolic domains of the erythropoietin receptor regulate growth signaling and down-modulate responsiveness to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

    Dawn E. Quelle;Don M. Wojchowski

  • EPO receptor circuits for primary erythroblast survival

    Pradeep Sathyanarayana;Arvind Dev;Jing Fang;Estelle Houde

  • The box1 domain of the erythropoietin receptor specifies Janus kinase 2 activation and functions mitogenically within an interleukin 2 beta-receptor chimera.

    Ning Jiang;Tong-Chuan He;Atsushi Miyajima;Don M. Wojchowski

  • EPO modulation of cell-cycle regulatory genes, and cell division, in primary bone marrow erythroblasts.

    Jing Fang;Madhu Menon;William Kapelle;Olga Bogacheva

  • BMP4 regulates vascular progenitor development in human embryonic stem cells through a Smad-dependent pathway

    Hao Bai;Yongxing Gao;Melanie Arzigian;Don M. Wojchowski

  • Pim-1 kinase protects hematopoietic FDC cells from genotoxin-induced death.

    Tony J Pircher;Shuqing Zhao;Justin N Geiger;Bhavana Joneja

  • Active human erythropoietin expressed in insect cells using a baculovirus vector: a role for N-linked oligosaccharide.

    Don M. Wojchowski;Stuart H. Orkin;Arthur J. Sytkowski

  • Core erythropoietin receptor signals for late erythroblast development.

    Madhu P. Menon;Jing Fang;Jing Fang;Don M. Wojchowski;Don M. Wojchowski

  • An in vivo reporter of BMP signaling in organogenesis reveals targets in the developing kidney

    Ulrika Blank;Marianne L Seto;Derek C Adams;Don M Wojchowski

  • High-level expression and purification of a recombinant human erythropoietin produced using a baculovirus vector

    Frederick W. Quelle;Laurie F. Caslake;Rebecca E. Burkert;Don M. Wojchowski

  • Erythropoietin-dependent Inhibition of Apoptosis Is Supported by Carboxyl-truncated Receptor Forms and Blocked by Dominant-negative Forms of Jak2

    Hongming Zhuang;Zhutian Niu;Tong-Chuan He;Sunil V. Patel

Frequent Co-Authors

Tong-Chuan He
Tong-Chuan He University of Chicago
Clifford A. Lowell
Clifford A. Lowell University of California, San Francisco
Bruce E. Torbett
Bruce E. Torbett Seattle Children's Hospital
Bengt Lindholm
Bengt Lindholm Karolinska Institute
Jonathan D. Licht
Jonathan D. Licht University of Florida
Christian J. Stoeckert
Christian J. Stoeckert University of Pennsylvania
Peter Besmer
Peter Besmer Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Calvin P.H. Vary
Calvin P.H. Vary Maine Medical Center
Reuben Kapur
Reuben Kapur Indiana University
Peter Stenvinkel
Peter Stenvinkel Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring biology and biochemistry can open doors to a wide variety of online degree programs and rewarding careers in healthcare and science. For those interested in food, health, and wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition offers flexible study options and paves the way for jobs in dietetics, health education, and public health.

If you’re aiming for leadership positions, accredited graduate programs can deepen your expertise. Choosing cahme accreditation mha programs helps ensure quality, as these programs meet rigorous healthcare education standards. For nurses seeking greater responsibility, online dnp programs without clinicals offer a flexible path for earning an advanced degree.

Finally, those interested in high-level management roles in healthcare settings can pursue online doctoral programs healthcare administration. These degrees prepare graduates for executive and academic positions, with many pathways to influence the future of healthcare systems. Overall, online study options are expanding, making it easier than ever to match your career goals with advanced education.

Best Scientists Citing Don M. Wojchowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles