World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
3984
World Ranking
9205
National Ranking
3300

Dirk Lummerzheim publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Lummerzheim sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 122 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dirk Lummerzheim D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Lummerzheim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dirk Lummerzheim is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of physics, astronomy, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, earth, and planetary sciences. Their work focuses significantly on subfields such as astronomy and astrophysics, molecular biology, geophysics, and atmospheric science.

Lummerzheim has contributed to a variety of scientific topics including:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies
  • Solar and space plasma dynamics
  • Earthquake detection and analysis
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate

Their recent published papers span several years and respected scientific journals. Key publications include:

  • Changes in the Magnetic Field Topology and the Dayside/Nightside Reconnection Rates in Response to a Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Front: A Case Study (2021), Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Balloons in the Earth's Auroral Science-BALBOA's Modern Exploration (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Role of ionospheric Pedersen conductance and its gradient in field-aligned currents (2022), Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Role of Ionospheric Pedersen Conductance and its Gradient in Field-Aligned Currents (2021), SSRN Electronic Journal

Lummerzheim frequently collaborates with other scientists, including coauthors such as:

  • T. Bhattacharya
  • A. Otto
  • A. Boudouridis
  • Hyunju Connor
  • A. J. Ridley

Lummerzheim's research appears regularly in journals such as the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics, the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, and the SSRN Electronic Journal, indicating a focus on geophysical and atmospheric studies.

Best Publications

  • Electron transport and energy degradation in the ionosphere: evaluation of the numerical solution, comparison with laboratory experiments and auroral observations

    D. Lummerzheim;J. Lilensten

  • Global energy deposition during the January 1997 magnetic cloud event

    G. Lu;D. N. Baker;R. L. McPherron;Charlie J. Farrugia

  • Effect of solar wind pressure pulses on the size and strength of the auroral oval

    A. Boudouridis;E. Zesta;R. Lyons;P. C. Anderson

  • Parameterization of monoenergetic electron impact ionization

    Xiaohua Fang;Cora E. Randall;Dirk Lummerzheim;Wenbin Wang

  • Remote determination of auroral energy characteristics during substorm activity

    G K Parks;M Brittnacher;Judy Cumnock

  • Efficient diffuse auroral electron scattering by electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic waves in the outer magnetosphere: A detailed case study

    Binbin Ni;Jun Liang;Richard M. Thorne;Vassilis Angelopoulos

  • Electron impact ionization: A new parameterization for 100 eV to 1 MeV electrons

    Xiaohua Fang;Cora E. Randall;Dirk Lummerzheim;Stanley C. Solomon

  • Ground-based optical observations of hydrogen emission in the auroral substorm

    C. Deehr;D. Lummerzheim

  • The Effect of the January 10, 1997, Pressure Pulse on the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Current System

    E. Zesta;H. J. Singer;D. Lummerzheim;C. T. Russell

  • Auroral energy deposition rate, characteristic electron energy, and ionospheric parameters derived from Dynamics Explorer 1 images

    M. H. Rees;D. Lummerzheim;R. G. Roble;J. D. Winningham

  • Enhanced solar wind geoeffectiveness after a sudden increase in dynamic pressure during southward IMF orientation

    A. Boudouridis;E. Zesta;L. R. Lyons;P. C. Anderson

  • On magnetospheric electron impact ionisation and dynamics in Titan's ram-side and polar ionosphere – a Cassini case study

    K. Agren;J.-E. Wahlund;Ronan Modolo;D. Lummerzheim

  • Angular dependent transport of auroral electrons in the upper atmosphere

    D. Lummerzheim;M.H. Rees;H.R. Anderson

  • Magnetospheric reconnection driven by solar wind pressure fronts

    A. Boudouridis;E. Zesta;L. R. Lyons;P. C. Anderson

  • Auroral Observations from the POLAR Ultraviolet Imager (UVI)

    J. F. Spann;G. K. Parks;M. J. Brittnacher

  • High time resolution study of the hemispheric power carried by energetic electrons into the ionosphere during the May 19/20,1996 auroral activity

    D. Lummerzheim;M. J. Brittnacher;D. Evans

  • Ionospheric conductances derived from DE-1 auroral images

    D. Lummerzheim;D. Lummerzheim;M.H. Rees;J.D. Craven;L.A. Frank;L.A. Frank

  • The UARS particle environment monitor

    J. D. Winningham;J. R. Sharber;R. A. Frahm;J. L. Burch

  • The profile of the hydrogen H β emission line in proton aurora

    Unknown

  • Large fluxes of auroral electrons in filaments of 100 m width

    B. S. Lanchester;M. H. Rees;D. Lummerzheim;A. Otto

  • Detailed analysis of substorm observations using SuperDARN, UVI, ground-based magnetometers, and all-sky imagers

    W. A. Bristow;G. J. Sofko;H. C. Stenbaek-Nielsen;S. Wei

Frequent Co-Authors

Marina Galand
Marina Galand Imperial College London
Larry R. Lyons
Larry R. Lyons University of California, Los Angeles
Gang Lu
Gang Lu National Center for Atmospheric Research
J. M. Ruohoniemi
J. M. Ruohoniemi Virginia Tech
Patrick T. Newell
Patrick T. Newell Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Harald U. Frey
Harald U. Frey University of California, Berkeley
Mamoru Ishii
Mamoru Ishii Purdue University West Lafayette
Stanley C. Solomon
Stanley C. Solomon National Center for Atmospheric Research
R. A. Frahm
R. A. Frahm Southwest Research Institute
L. A. Frank
L. A. Frank University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide flexibility and accessibility. Many students turn to accredited eds to edd programs as a way to pursue advanced education in education leadership or policy, which can complement environmental careers focused on advocacy and education.

Professionals aiming to impact social aspects of environmental work may find fully funded opportunities through fully funded dsw programs online. These programs blend social work and environmental justice, opening career pathways in community health and sustainability initiatives.

For those seeking a broader educational foundation, an online general studies degree affordable option can provide a cost-effective route to build interdisciplinary knowledge—essential for tackling complex environmental problems.

Additionally, students new to college or switching fields might consider some of the easy bachelor's degree programs available online to gain essential skills without overwhelming academic pressures. These pathways support diverse entry points into environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Lummerzheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles