World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
12691
World Ranking
2632
National Ranking
43

Jan-Erik Wahlund publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Erik Wahlund sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 371 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jan-Erik Wahlund D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Erik Wahlund sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • SMALL SCALE ALFVÉNIC STRUCTURE IN THE AURORA

    K. Stasiewicz;P. Bellan;C. Chaston;C. Kletzing

  • The Cassini Radio and Plasma Wave Investigation

    D. A. Gurnett;W. S. Kurth;D. L. Kirchner;G. B. Hospodarsky

  • What makes a planet habitable

    H. Lammer;J. H. Bredehöft;A. Coustenis;M. L. Khodachenko

  • First results of electric field and density observations by Cluster EFW based on initial months of operation

    Georg Gustafsson;M. Andre;T. Carozzi;A. I. Eriksson

  • Observation of kinetic Alfvén waves by the FREJA spacecraft

    P. Louarn;J. E. Wahlund;T. Chust;H. de Feraudy

  • Negative ion chemistry in Titan's upper atmosphere

    Veronique Vuitton;Veronique Vuitton;Panayotis Lavvas;R.V. Yelle;M. Galand

  • Thermal ion imagers and Langmuir probes in the Swarm electric field instruments

    D. J. Knudsen;J. K. Burchill;Stephan Buchert;Anders Eriksson

  • Radio and plasma wave observations at Saturn from Cassini's approach and first orbit.

    D.A. Gurnett;W. S. Kurth;G. B. Hospodarsky;A. M. Persoon

  • On ion acoustic turbulence and the nonlinear evolution of kinetic Alfvén waves in aurora

    J.E. Wahlund;P. Louarn;T. Chust;H. de Feraudy

  • Composition of Titan's ionosphere

    T. E. Cravens;I. P. Robertson;Jr H. Waite;R. V. Yelle

  • EISCAT observations of topside ionospheric ion outflows during auroral activity: Revisited

    J. E. Wahlund;H. J. Opgenoorth;I. Häggström;K. J. Winser

  • Cassini Measurements of Cold Plasma in the Ionosphere of Titan

    J.-E. Wahlund;R. Boström;G. Gustafsson;D. A. Gurnett

  • Aerosol growth in Titan’s ionosphere

    Panayotis Lavvas;Roger V. Yelle;Tommi Koskinen;Axel Bazin

  • RPC-LAP: The Rosetta Langmuir Probe Instrument

    Anders Eriksson;Rolf Boström;Reine Gill;Lennart Åhlén

  • Broadband ELF plasma emission during auroral energization: 1. Slow ion acoustic waves

    J.-E. Wahlund;A. I. Eriksson;B. Holback;M. H. Boehm

  • Detection of dusty plasma near the E-ring of Saturn

    J.-E. Wahlund;M. André;A.I.E. Eriksson;M. Lundberg

  • Identification of widespread turbulence of dispersive Alfvén waves

    K. Stasiewicz;Y. Khotyaintsev;M. Berthomier;J E. Wahlund

  • The magnetic memory of Titan's ionized atmosphere.

    C. Bertucci;N. Achilleos;M. K. Dougherty;R. Modolo

  • Dusty plasma in the vicinity of Enceladus

    Michiko W. Morooka;Jan-Erik Wahlund;Anders I. Eriksson;W. M. Farrell

  • On the ionospheric structure of Titan

    K. Ågren;K. Ågren;J.-E. Wahlund;P. Garnier;Ronan Modolo

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Kurth
William S. Kurth University of Iowa
Andrew J. Coates
Andrew J. Coates University College London
Thomas E. Cravens
Thomas E. Cravens University of Kansas
Michele K. Dougherty
Michele K. Dougherty Imperial College London
Mats André
Mats André Swedish Institute of Space Physics
D. A. Gurnett
D. A. Gurnett University of Iowa
Marina Galand
Marina Galand Imperial College London
Roger V. Yelle
Roger V. Yelle University of Arizona
Yingjuan Ma
Yingjuan Ma University of California, Los Angeles
Stas Barabash
Stas Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Environmental Sciences opens various avenues for further education and career development. Many students seek flexible learning options to balance work and study, making online degree programs an attractive choice. For those interested in advanced educational roles, programs like online Ed D programs without dissertation provide alternative pathways to doctoral qualifications without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Transitioning from a master’s to a doctoral degree is a common step for professionals aiming to deepen their expertise. Individuals can explore some of the best online EdS to EdD programs that offer seamless progression tailored for working educators and environmental scientists.

For those looking to integrate social work with environmental advocacy, pursuing fully funded DSW programs can be a viable option. These programs support advanced practice and leadership without the burden of heavy student debt, facilitating impactful careers managing community and environmental health projects.

Additionally, earning a broad-based qualification through some of the best affordable online general studies degree programs can help students build interdisciplinary skills that complement their environmental science knowledge, enhancing their adaptability in diverse job markets.

Best Scientists Citing Jan-Erik Wahlund

Recently Published Articles