World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 39 4113 3847 169 168 117 6577

Didier Bogusz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Didier Bogusz between 1980 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Didier Bogusz published across 41 years, from 1980 to 2020, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2011. 5 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2011. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications
1980 2020

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Didier Bogusz: publications per year, 1980 to 2020
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 8
2001 1
2002 3
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 5
2009 3
2010 4
2011 9
2012 7
2013 6
2014 1
2015 7
2016 6
2017 0
2018 3
2019 2
2020 3
Total 117
Download as CSV

Didier Bogusz publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Bogusz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 116–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 117 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253 117
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Didier Bogusz D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Bogusz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229 39
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Didier Bogusz mostly deals with Botany, Frankia, Actinorhizal plant, Rhizobium and Gene. He interconnects Organism, Arabidopsis, Auxin and Cell biology in the investigation of issues within Botany. The study incorporates disciplines such as Primordium, Lateral root formation and Meristem in addition to Auxin.

His Actinorhizal plant research entails a greater understanding of Root nodule. The various areas that Didier Bogusz examines in his Root nodule study include Transformation, Agrobacterium and Auxin influx. Didier Bogusz has researched Rhizobium in several fields, including Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Rhizobia, Lotus and Intron.

His most cited work include:

  • Cytokinins Act Directly on Lateral Root Founder Cells to Inhibit Root Initiation (424 citations)
  • Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants (326 citations)
  • SymRK defines a common genetic basis for plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia, and Frankia bacteria (223 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Actinorhizal plant, Frankia, Root nodule and Casuarina glauca. Didier Bogusz has included themes like Allocasuarina verticillata, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Rhizobia, Casuarinaceae and Gene in his Botany study. Didier Bogusz combines subjects such as Ecology, Microbiology, Reporter gene, Root hair and Medicago truncatula with his study of Actinorhizal plant.

The various areas that he examines in his Frankia study include Arabidopsis thaliana, Casuarina and Rhizobium. His work focuses on many connections between Arabidopsis thaliana and other disciplines, such as Auxin, that overlap with his field of interest in Cell biology. His research in Root nodule intersects with topics in Primordium and Genomics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (81.25%)
  • Actinorhizal plant (62.50%)
  • Frankia (61.46%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?

  • Botany (81.25%)
  • Frankia (61.46%)
  • Actinorhizal plant (62.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, Frankia, Actinorhizal plant, Root nodule and Casuarina. His Botany study combines topics in areas such as Rhizobia, Hyperaccumulator, Gene and Medicago truncatula. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Casuarina glauca, Casuarina cunninghamiana, Microbiology and Root hair.

His Actinorhizal plant research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ecology, Biotechnology and Rhizobium. His study focuses on the intersection of Ecology and fields such as Casuarinaceae with connections in the field of Plant genetics. His work carried out in the field of Casuarina brings together such families of science as Agroforestry, Inoculation, Salinity and Casuarina equisetifolia.

Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants (326 citations)
  • Effect of lead on root growth (119 citations)
  • The role of flavonoids in the establishment of plant roots endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia and Frankia bacteria (106 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Didier Bogusz focuses on Botany, Actinorhizal plant, Frankia, Rhizobia and Root nodule. His Root system study in the realm of Botany interacts with subjects such as Rhizosphere. His Actinorhizal plant research incorporates themes from Physiology, Rhizobium and Microbiology.

His Frankia research incorporates elements of Ecology, Casuarina and Introduced species. The study incorporates disciplines such as Chalcone synthase, Naringenin and Flavonoid biosynthesis in addition to Rhizobia. His research integrates issues of Medicago truncatula and Gene, Root hair in his study of Root nodule.

Best Publications

  • Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants

    Carole Santi;Didier Bogusz;Claudine Franche

  • Cytokinins Act Directly on Lateral Root Founder Cells to Inhibit Root Initiation

    Laurent Laplaze;Eva Benkova;Ilda Casimiro;Lies Maes

  • SymRK defines a common genetic basis for plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia, and Frankia bacteria

    Hassen Gherbi;Katharina Markmann;Sergio Svistoonoff;Joan Estevan

  • Effect of lead on root growth

    Mouna Fahr;Laurent Laplaze;Laurent Laplaze;Najib Bendaou;Valerie Hocher

  • The role of flavonoids in the establishment of plant roots endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia and Frankia bacteria

    Khalid Abdel-Lateif;Didier Bogusz;Valérie Hocher

  • Zinc Hyperaccumulation in Plants: A Review.

    Habiba Balafrej;Didier Bogusz;Zine-El Abidine Triqui;Abdelkarim Guedira

  • Functioning haemoglobin genes in non-nodulating plants

    Didier Bogusz;C.A. Appleby;J. Landsmann;E.S. Dennis

  • GAL4-GFP enhancer trap lines for genetic manipulation of lateral root development in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Laurent Laplaze;Boris Parizot;Andrew Baker;Lilian Ricaud

  • Transcriptomics of actinorhizal symbioses reveals homologs of the whole common symbiotic signaling cascade.

    Valerie Hocher;Nicole Alloisio;Florence Auguy;Pascale Fournier

  • A role for haemoglobin in all plant roots

    C.A. Appleby;Didier Bogusz;E.S. Dennis;W.J. Peacock

  • The kinetics of ligand binding to plant hemoglobins: structural implications

    Q H Gibson;J B Wittenberg;B A Wittenberg;D Bogusz

  • Hairy root nodulation of Casuarina glauca: a system for the study of symbiotic gene expression in an actinorhizal tree.

    Diégane Diouf;H. Gherbi;Yves Prin;Claudine Franche

  • Auxin Influx Activity Is Associated with Frankia Infection during Actinorhizal Nodule Formation in Casuarina glauca

    Benjamin Péret;Ranjan Swarup;Leentje Jansen;Gaëlle Devos

  • Casuarina research and applications in China

    Chonglu Zhong;Yong Zhang;Yu Chen;Qingbin Jiang

  • Genetic transformation of the actinorhizal tree Allocasuarina verticillata by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

    C. Franche;D. Diouf;Q.V. Le;D. Bogusz

  • Characterization of a Casuarina glauca Nodule-Specific Subtilisin-like Protease Gene, a Homolog of Alnus glutinosa ag12

    Laurent Laplaze;Ana Ribeiro;Claudine Franche;Emile Duhoux

  • Nonlegume hemoglobin genes retain organ-specific expression in heterologous transgenic plants.

    Didier Bogusz;D.J. Llewellyn;S. Craig;E.S. Dennis

  • Flavan-containing cells delimit Frankia-infected compartments in Casuarina glauca nodules

    Laurent Laplaze;Hassen Gherbi;Thierry Frutz;Katharina Pawlowski

  • Actinorhizal Symbioses: Recent Advances in Plant Molecular and Genetic Transformation Studies

    Claudine Franche;Laurent Laplaze;Emile Duhoux;Didier Bogusz

  • The Independent Acquisition of Plant Root Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis in Fabids Recruited the Same Genetic Pathway for Nodule Organogenesis

    Sergio Svistoonoff;Faiza Meriem Benabdoun;Mathish Nambiar-Veetil;Leandro Imanishi;Leandro Imanishi

  • cg12 Expression is specifically linked to infection of root hairs and cortical cells during Casuarina glauca and Allocasuarina verticillata actinorhizal nodule development

    Sergio Svistoonoff;Laurent Laplaze;Florence Auguy;John Runions

  • Auxin Influx Activity Is Associated with Frankia Infection during Actinorhizal Nodule Formation in

    Ranjan Swarup;Leen Jansen;Florence Auguy;Myriam Collin

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurent Laplaze
Laurent Laplaze University of Montpellier
Valérie Hocher
Valérie Hocher Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Patrick Doumas
Patrick Doumas INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Katharina Pawlowski
Katharina Pawlowski Stockholm University
Philippe Normand
Philippe Normand Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Malcolm J. Bennett
Malcolm J. Bennett University of Nottingham
Ranjan Swarup
Ranjan Swarup University of Nottingham
Jim Haseloff
Jim Haseloff University of Cambridge
David G. Barker
David G. Barker Paul Sabatier University
Roger N. Beachy
Roger N. Beachy Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Didier Bogusz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles