World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
4930
World Ranking
8698
National Ranking
3108

David T. Long publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Long sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David T. Long D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Long sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David T. Long is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States and focuses their research primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their work explores various subfields including Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Oncology, Epidemiology, and Reproductive Medicine.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, DNA Repair Mechanisms, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks.

David T. Long has contributed to a number of recent papers, with publications in recognized journals:

  • Arginine methylation of BRD4 by PRMT2/4 governs transcription and DNA repair, 2022, Science Advances
  • BRD4 promotes resection and homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks, 2022, Nature Communications
  • SWAN pathway-network identification of common aneuploidy-based oncogenic drivers, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein E1 binds polycytosine DNA and monitors genome integrity, 2021, Life Science Alliance
  • BRCA1-BARD1 regulates transcription through BRD4 in Xenopus nucleoplasmic extract, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research

Their research has been published frequently in a select set of venues, highlighting a pattern of peer-reviewed communication:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 3 publications
  • Nucleic Acids Research - 2 publications
  • Science Advances - 1 publication
  • Nature Communications - 1 publication
  • Targeted Oncology - 1 publication

David T. Long collaborates frequently with several coauthors who contribute to their research field. This group includes:

  • Joe R. Delaney
  • George Fullbright
  • Christian M. Jones
  • John K. Barrows
  • Robert R. Bowers

Best Publications

  • Spatial and temporal distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from Michigan inland lakes.

    Kurunthachalam Kannan;Boris Johnson-Restrepo;Sharon S. Yohn;John P. Giesy

  • Atmospheric Loading of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Lake Michigan as Recorded in the Sediments

    Matt F. Simcik;Steven J. Eisenreich;Katherine A. Golden;Shi Ping Liu

  • Identifying relationships between baseflow geochemistry and land use with synoptic sampling and R-mode factor analysis

    Karen G. Wayland;David T. Long;David W. Hyndman;Bryan C. Pijanowski

  • Exploring the effects of urban and agricultural land use on surface water chemistry, across a regional watershed, using multivariate statistics

    M.L. Fitzpatrick;D.T. Long;B.C. Pijanowski

  • Geochemistry and isotope chemistry of Michigan Basin brines: Devonian formations

    Timothy P. Wilson;David T. Long

  • Accumulation, inventory, and diagenesis of chlorinated hydrocarbons in lake ontario sediments.

    Charles S. Wong;Gordon. Sanders;Daniel R. Engstrom;David T. Long

  • Terrestrial weathering of Antarctic stone meteorites: Formation of Mg-carbonates on ordinary chondrites

    Michael A. Velbel;David T. Long;James L. Gooding

  • The origin and cycling of particulate and sedimentary organic matter and nitrate in Lake Superior

    Nathaniel E Ostrom;David T Long;Emily M Bell;Tina Beals

  • Microbial Diversity and Resistance to Copper in Metal-Contaminated Lake Sediment

    K.T. Konstantinidis;N. Isaacs;J. Fett;S. Simpson

  • Geochemistry and isotope chemistry of CaNaCl brines in Silurian strata, Michigan Basin, U.S.A.

    T.P. Wilson;D.T. Long

  • Formation of alunite, jarosite and hydrous iron oxides in a hypersaline system: Lake Tyrrell, Victoria, Australia

    D.T. Long;N.E. Fegan;J.D. McKee;W.B. Lyons

  • A Land Transformation Model for the Saginaw Bay Watershed

    Bryan C. Pijanowski;Stuart H. Gage;David T. Long;William E. Cooper

  • Stormwater dissolved organic matter: influence of land cover and environmental factors.

    Shawn P. McElmurry;David T. Long;Thomas C. Voice

  • Spatial and temporal changes in microbial community structure associated with recharge-influenced chemical gradients in a contaminated aquifer.

    Sheridan K. Haack;Lisa R. Fogarty;Toby G. West;Elizabeth W. Alm

  • Evaluating behavior of oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate during recharge and quantifying reduction rates in a contaminated aquifer.

    Jennifer T. McGuire;David T. Long;Michael J. Klug;Sheridan K. Haack

  • Chemical speciation of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in mixed freshwater, seawater, and brine solutions

    Unknown

  • Identifying Potential Land Use‐Derived Solute Sources to Stream Baseflow Using Ground Water Models and GIS

    David F. Boutt;David W. Hyndman;Bryan C. Pijanowski;David T. Long

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury accumulation in lacustrine sediments across the Laurentian Great Lakes region

    Paul E. Drevnick;Daniel R. Engstrom;Charles T. Driscoll;Edward B. Swain

  • Rare-earth element distribution in Lake Tyrrell groundwaters, Victoria, Australia

    Jennifer A. Fee;Henri E. Gaudette;W.Berry Lyons;David T. Long

  • Calcification of cyanobacterial mats in Solar Lake, Sinai

    W. Berry Lyons;David T. Long;Mark E. Hines;Henri E. Gaudette

  • Developing the scientific framework for urban geochemistry

    Lisa G. Chambers;Yu Ping Chin;Gabriel M. Filippelli;Christopher B. Gardner

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Berry Lyons
W. Berry Lyons The Ohio State University
David W. Hyndman
David W. Hyndman The University of Texas at Dallas
Bryan C. Pijanowski
Bryan C. Pijanowski Purdue University West Lafayette
Russell S. Harmon
Russell S. Harmon North Carolina State University
Mark E. Hines
Mark E. Hines University of Massachusetts Lowell
John P. Giesy
John P. Giesy University of Saskatchewan
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
Steven J. Eisenreich
Steven J. Eisenreich Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Robert M. Owen
Robert M. Owen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Deborah L. Swackhamer
Deborah L. Swackhamer University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse opportunities beyond traditional study paths. For students seeking flexibility and affordability, an affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad educational foundation that supports various environmental careers.

Some learners may prioritize completing their degree efficiently, making an easiest bachelor degree option appealing. These programs are designed for students aiming for manageable coursework while still securing a meaningful credential in related fields.

Specialized environmental roles often require technical expertise, such as knowledge in geology. Prospective students can consider online geology programs that equip graduates with essential skills in earth sciences and environmental assessment.

Another promising pathway involves Geographic Information Systems (GIS), a critical tool for environmental mapping and analysis. Many institutions now offer strong options among colleges with GIS programs, perfect for students interested in applying spatial technology to environmental management.

Best Scientists Citing David T. Long

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles