World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
15717
World Ranking
2890
National Ranking
277

David M. Bowen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Bowen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 179 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David M. Bowen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Bowen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Bowen was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spanned several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on medicine and neuroscience, with specific attention to cognitive neuroscience, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, neurology, surgery, and urology.

The scientist contributed to studies across multiple domains, addressing topics such as neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, vestibular and auditory disorders, cardiovascular function and risk factors, urological disorders and treatments, renal and related cancers, and congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies.

Their work was published in a variety of scientific venues, including Science Advances, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, Clinical Research in Cardiology, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Among their recent papers, notable publications included:

  • "Cortico-cerebellar coordination facilitates neuroprosthetic control," 2024, Science Advances
  • "LUMBAR syndrome-OEIS complex overlap: A case series and review," 2024, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • "Prognostic value of temporal patterns of left atrial reservoir strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction," 2023, Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • "P802 Delayed time to peak left ventricular outflow tract velocity is associated with symptomatic status in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy," 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Cortico-cerebellar coordination facilitates neuroprosthetic control," 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

David M. Bowen collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Aamir Abbasi, Rohit Rangwani, Andrew W. Fealy, Nathan P. Danielsen, and Tanuj Gulati. These partnerships were reflected in multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Neurotransmitter-related enzymes and indices of hypoxia in senile dementia and other abiotrophies.

    David M. Bowen;Carolyn B. Smith;Pamela White;Alan N. Davison

  • Alzheimer's disease. Correlation of cortical choline acetyltransferase activity with the severity of dementia and histological abnormalities.

    G.K. Wilcock;M.M. Esiri;D.M. Bowen;C.C.T. Smith

  • NEOCORTICAL CHOLINERGIC NEURONS IN ELDERLY PEOPLE

    P. White;M.J. Goodhardt;J.P. Keet;C.R. Hiley

  • Presynaptic Cholinergic Dysfunction in Patients with Dementia

    N. R. Sims;D. M. Bowen;S. J. Allen;C. C. T. Smith

  • Biochemical assessment of serotonergic and cholinergic dysfunction and cerebral atrophy in Alzheimer's disease.

    D. M. Bowen;S. J. Allen;J. S. Benton;M. J. Goodhardt

  • Neurochemical studies of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Possible influence on treatment.

    Paul T. Francis;Alan M. Palmer;Neil R. Sims;David M. Bowen

  • ACCELERATED AGEING OR SELECTIVE NEURONAL LOSS AS AN IMPORTANT CAUSE OF DEMENTIA

    J.A Spillane;G Curzon;W Meier-Ruge;P White

  • Alzheimer's disease: a correlative study.

    D Neary;J S Snowden;D M Mann;D M Bowen

  • Cortical Pyramidal Neurone Loss May Cause Glutamatergic Hypoactivity and Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease: Investigative and Therapeutic Perspectives

    Paul T. Francis;Neil R. Sims;Andrew W. Procter;David M. Bowen

  • Choline acetyltransferase activity and histopathology of frontal neocortex from biopsies of demented patients

    D.M. Bowen;J.S. Benton;J.A. Spillane;C.C.T. Smith

  • Presynaptic serotonergic dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    A. M. Palmer;P. T. Francis;J. S. Benton;N. R. Sims

  • Neuropsychological syndromes in presenile dementia due to cerebral atrophy.

    D Neary;J S Snowden;D M Bowen;N R Sims

  • GLUCOSE METABOLISM AND ACETYLCHOLINE SYNTHESIS IN RELATION TO NEURONAL ACTIVITY IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

    N.R. Sims;C.C.T. Smith;A.N. Davison;D.M. Bowen

  • Evidence of Glutamatergic Denervation and Possible Abnormal Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease

    A. W. Procter;A. M. Palmer;P. T. Francis;S. L. Lowe

  • Mitochondrial function in brain tissue in primary degenerative dementia

    N.R. Sims;J.M. Finegan;J.P. Blass;D.M. Bowen

  • Possible neurotransmitter basis of behavioral changes in Alzheimer's disease.

    Alan M. Palmer;Gary C. Stratmann;Andrew W. Procter;David M. Bowen

  • Monoaminergic innervation of the frontal and temporal lobes in Alzheimer's disease

    Alan M. Palmer;Gordon K. Wilcock;Margaret M. Esiri;Paul T. Francis

  • THE NUCLEUS BASALIS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: CELL COUNTS AND CORTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY

    G K Wilcock;M M Esiri;D M Bowen;C C T Smith

  • Biochemical Evidence of Selective Nerve Cell Changes in the Normal Ageing Human and Rat Brain

    S. J. Allen;J. S. Benton;M. J. Goodhardt;E. A. Haan

  • Circumscribed changes of the cerebral cortex in neuropsychiatric disorders of later life.

    David M. Bowen;Abdolrahman Najlerahim;Andrew W. Procter;Paul T. Francis

  • Increased transmitter amino acid concentration in human ventricular CSF after brain trauma.

    Alan M. Palmer;Donald W. Marion;Michelle L. Botscheller;David M. Bowen

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul T. Francis
Paul T. Francis University of Exeter
David Neary
David Neary Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Alan M. Palmer
Alan M. Palmer Elixa MediScience
Margaret M. Esiri
Margaret M. Esiri University of Oxford
Gordon K. Wilcock
Gordon K. Wilcock University of Oxford
Clive Holmes
Clive Holmes University of Southampton
Derek N. Middlemiss
Derek N. Middlemiss GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
John P. Blass
John P. Blass Cornell University
Christopher Chen
Christopher Chen National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David M. Bowen