World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
13035
World Ranking
6806
National Ranking
526

Alan M. Palmer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alan M. Palmer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan M. Palmer is affiliated with Elixa MediScience in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, with a focus on both broad and specialized subfields. The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine, with particular attention to subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology.

The researcher is involved in various topics, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Alan M. Palmer has contributed to published work that appears in journals such as the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Innovation in Aging. Notable papers include:

  • "Systematic approach to selecting licensed drugs for repurposing in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis," published in 2020 in the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Ethnicity Moderating the Relationship of Cognition Function of Patients With Dementia on Caregiver Depression," published in 2020 in Innovation in Aging

Collaborations have involved frequent coauthors including Nick Cunniffe, Khue Anh Vuong, Debbie Ainslie, David Baker, and Judy Beveridge. These collaborations indicate a multidisciplinary approach and engagement with various experts within related fields.

Publication venues frequently associated with Alan M. Palmer's work include:

  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Innovation in Aging

The diversity of fields and topics covered shows a research profile that intersects clinical research and public health concerns, particularly addressing neurological conditions, mental health, and caregiving dynamics. This reflects a commitment to both disease-specific studies and broader psychosocial factors relevant to patient care and family dynamics.

Best Publications

  • The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: a review of progress

    Paul T Francis;Alan M Palmer;Michael Snape;Gordon K Wilcock

  • Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury with Moderate Hypothermia

    Donald W. Marion;Louis E. Penrod;Sheryl F. Kelsey;Walter D. Obrist

  • Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, the Blood-Brain Barrier, and Central Nervous System Drug Discovery

    Mohammad S. Alavijeh;Mansoor Chishty;M. Zeeshan Qaiser;Alan M. Palmer

  • Biochemical assessment of serotonergic and cholinergic dysfunction and cerebral atrophy in Alzheimer's disease.

    D. M. Bowen;S. J. Allen;J. S. Benton;M. J. Goodhardt

  • Traumatic brain injury-induced excitotoxicity assessed in a controlled cortical impact model.

    Alan M. Palmer;Donald W. Marion;Michelle L. Botscheller;Pamela E. Swedlow

  • Neurochemical studies of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Possible influence on treatment.

    Paul T. Francis;Alan M. Palmer;Neil R. Sims;David M. Bowen

  • Regulation of interstitial excitatory amino acid concentrations after cortical contusion injury.

    Marie E Rose;Michele B Huerbin;John Melick;Donald W Marion

  • Presynaptic serotonergic dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    A. M. Palmer;P. T. Francis;J. S. Benton;N. R. Sims

  • Evidence of Glutamatergic Denervation and Possible Abnormal Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease

    A. W. Procter;A. M. Palmer;P. T. Francis;S. L. Lowe

  • Possible neurotransmitter basis of behavioral changes in Alzheimer's disease.

    Alan M. Palmer;Gary C. Stratmann;Andrew W. Procter;David M. Bowen

  • Severe controlled cortical impact in rats: assessment of cerebral edema, blood flow, and contusion volume.

    Patrick M. Kochanek;Donald W. Marion;Weiguo Zhang;Joanne K. Schiding

  • Monoaminergic innervation of the frontal and temporal lobes in Alzheimer's disease

    Alan M. Palmer;Gordon K. Wilcock;Margaret M. Esiri;Paul T. Francis

  • Is the Neuronal Basis of Alzheimer's Disease Cholinergic or Glutamatergic?

    Alan M. Palmer;Samuel Gershon

  • Monoamine neurons in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

    A M Palmer;S T DeKosky

  • Selective increase in lipid peroxidation in the inferior temporal cortex in Alzheimer's disease

    Alan M. Palmer;Mark A. Burns

  • Hypothermia Attenuates the Normal Increase in Interleukin 1β RNA and Nerve Growth Factor Following Traumatic Brain Injury in the Rat

    James R. Goss;Scot D. Styren;Peter D. Miller;Patrick M. Kochanek

  • Increased transmitter amino acid concentration in human ventricular CSF after brain trauma.

    Alan M. Palmer;Donald W. Marion;Michelle L. Botscheller;David M. Bowen

  • GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID CONCENTRATION IN BRAIN TISSUE AT TWO STAGES OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

    S. L. Lowe;P. T. Francis;A. W. Procter;A. M. Palmer

  • Topographical distribution of neurochemical changes in alzheimer's disease

    Andrew W. Procter;Andrew W. Procter;Stephen L. Lowe;Alan M. Palmer;Paul T. Francis

  • Mild Posttraumatic Hypothermia Reduces Mortality after Severe Controlled Cortical Impact in Rats

    Robert S. B. Clark;Patrick M. Kochanek;Donald W. Marion;Joanne K. Schiding

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Bowen
David M. Bowen University of Oxford
Paul T. Francis
Paul T. Francis University of Exeter
Donald W. Marion
Donald W. Marion United States Army Research Laboratory
David Neary
David Neary Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Patrick M. Kochanek
Patrick M. Kochanek University of Pittsburgh
Gordon K. Wilcock
Gordon K. Wilcock University of Oxford
German Barrionuevo
German Barrionuevo University of Pittsburgh
Margaret M. Esiri
Margaret M. Esiri University of Oxford
Steven H. Graham
Steven H. Graham University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of related career paths, especially in mental health, social work, and counseling. Those interested in practical applications of neuroscience often consider accelerated online msw programs to move quickly into social work fields that require deep understanding of brain and behavior.

Psychology is another closely linked discipline. Pursuing an online accelerated psychology degree can help students leverage their neuroscience background for counseling, therapy, or research-based roles.

If you are specifically interested in supporting mental wellness, many opt for online mental health counseling programs. These offer flexible, accredited pathways into private practice or clinical environments.

For affordability, you might also explore the cheapest mental health counseling degree options. Cost-effective programs ensure greater accessibility to this rewarding career path. By combining neuroscience knowledge with these related online degrees, graduates can significantly broaden their employment opportunities in healthcare, research, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Alan M. Palmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles