World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 80 3989 3675 1968 1773 343 37361

David Gonzalez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Gonzalez between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Gonzalez published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2012. 15 of the 408 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2012. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 11 publications
1975 2025

408 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Gonzalez: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 4
2000 5
2001 4
2002 2
2003 8
2004 6
2005 15
2006 24
2007 12
2008 17
2009 13
2010 17
2011 17
2012 32
2013 19
2014 17
2015 12
2016 16
2017 22
2018 29
2019 32
2020 28
2021 32
2022 4
2023 5
2024 4
2025 11
Total 408
Download as CSV

David Gonzalez publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gonzalez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 337–346 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 343 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240 343
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

David Gonzalez D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gonzalez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412 80
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Gonzalez is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States and focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

The researcher's publications cover a range of topics related to cancer diagnostics and treatment, molecular biology techniques, and clinical applications in oncology. Key research areas include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications, and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by David Gonzalez include:

  • "The New EU Regulation on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices: Implications and Preparatory Actions for Diagnostic Laboratories," 2021, HemaSphere
  • "A novel next generation sequencing approach to improve sarcoma diagnosis," 2020, Modern Pathology
  • "Practical considerations for optimising homologous recombination repair mutation testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer," 2021, The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
  • "Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): From biology to clinical exploitation," 2021, Genes Chromosomes and Cancer
  • "Practical Guidance on Establishing a Molecular Testing Pathway for Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Clinical Practice for Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer," 2023, European Urology Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Gonzalez include:

  • Peter Stewart (7 publications)
  • Jana Gazdová (6 publications)
  • Mark Catherwood (5 publications)
  • Shambhavi Srivastava (4 publications)
  • Albrecht Stenzinger (4 publications)

David Gonzalez's publications have appeared in multiple reputable venues, with frequent contributions to Blood, Histopathology, Scientific Reports, HemaSphere, and Modern Pathology.

  • Blood (3 publications)
  • Histopathology (2 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (2 publications)
  • HemaSphere (1 publication)
  • Modern Pathology (1 publication)

The research conducted by David Gonzalez primarily addresses key challenges in molecular diagnostics and clinical oncology, with a particular emphasis on homologous recombination repair mutation testing and cancer genomics applications in prostate cancer and sarcomas. Their work contributes to understanding diagnostic regulations, molecular testing pathways, and the biological mechanisms underlying DNA repair deficiencies in cancer.

Best Publications

  • Landscape of transcription in human cells

    Sarah Djebali;Carrie A. Davis;Angelika Merkel;Alex Dobin

  • Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking

    Mingxun Wang;Jeremy J Carver;Vanessa V Phelan;Laura M Sanchez

  • Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936.

    J J M van Dongen;A W Langerak;M Brüggemann;P A S Evans

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • Context-Dependent and Disease-Specific Diversity in Protein Interactions within Stress Granules.

    Sebastian Markmiller;Sahar Soltanieh;Kari L. Server;Raymond Mak

  • EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 guidelines for interpretation and reporting of Ig/TCR clonality testing in suspected lymphoproliferations

    A. W. Langerak;P. J. T. A. Groenen;M. Brüggemann;K. Beldjord

  • Direct cloning and refactoring of a silent lipopeptide biosynthetic gene cluster yields the antibiotic taromycin A

    Kazuya Yamanaka;Kirk A. Reynolds;Roland D. Kersten;Katherine S. Ryan;Katherine S. Ryan

  • Germinal Center B Cell and T Follicular Helper Cell Development Initiates in the Interfollicular Zone

    Steven M. Kerfoot;Gur Yaari;Jaymin R. Patel;Kody L. Johnson

  • Combination delivery of TGF-β inhibitor and IL-2 by nanoscale liposomal polymeric gels enhances tumour immunotherapy

    Jason Park;Stephen H. Wrzesinski;Stephen H. Wrzesinski;Eric Stern;Michael Look

  • Dysregulated Microbial Fermentation of Soluble Fiber Induces Cholestatic Liver Cancer.

    Vishal Singh;Beng San Yeoh;Benoit Chassaing;Xia Xiao

  • Mismatch Repair Deficiency, Microsatellite Instability, and Survival: An Exploratory Analysis of the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) Trial

    Elizabeth C Smyth;Andrew Wotherspoon;Clare Peckitt;David Gonzalez

  • Live imaging of stem cell and progeny behaviour in physiological hair-follicle regeneration

    Panteleimon Rompolas;Elizabeth R. Deschene;Giovanni Zito;David G. Gonzalez

  • Significantly improved PCR-based clonality testing in B-cell malignancies by use of multiple immunoglobulin gene targets: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936

    P. A. S. Evans;Ch Pott;P. J. T. A. Groenen;G. Salles

  • Mutational Status of the TP53 Gene As a Predictor of Response and Survival in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results From the LRF CLL4 Trial

    David Gonzalez;Pilar Martinez;Rachel Wade;Sarah Hockley

  • Intraclonal heterogeneity is a critical early event in the development of myeloma and precedes the development of clinical symptoms.

    Brian A Walker;Christopher P Wardell;Lorenzo Melchor;Annamaria Brioli

  • Intraclonal heterogeneity and distinct molecular mechanisms characterize the development of t(4;14) and t(11;14) myeloma.

    Brian A. Walker;Christopher P. Wardell;Lorenzo Melchor;Sanna Hulkki

  • Dynamic regulation of FGF23 by Fam20C phosphorylation, GalNAc-T3 glycosylation, and furin proteolysis

    Vincent S. Tagliabracci;James L. Engel;Sandra E. Wiley;Junyu Xiao

  • Insights into the multistep transformation of MGUS to myeloma using microarray expression analysis

    Faith E. Davies;Ann M. Dring;Cheng Li;Andrew C. Rawstron

  • ERIC recommendations on TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    S Pospisilova;D Gonzalez;J Malcikova;M Trbusek

  • Refining the diagnosis and EGFR status of non-small cell lung carcinoma in biopsy and cytologic material, using a panel of mucin staining, TTF-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and P63, and EGFR mutation analysis.

    Andrew G. Nicholson;David Gonzalez;Pallav Shah;Matthew J. Pynegar

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth J. Morgan
Gareth J. Morgan Boston University
Brian A Walker
Brian A Walker Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Pieter C. Dorrestein
Pieter C. Dorrestein University of California, San Diego
Victor Nizet
Victor Nizet University of California, San Diego
Faith E. Davies
Faith E. Davies New York University Langone Medical Center
Ramón García-Sanz
Ramón García-Sanz University of Salamanca
Estella Matutes
Estella Matutes University of Barcelona
Daniel Catovsky
Daniel Catovsky Institute of Cancer Research
Esko I. Kauppinen
Esko I. Kauppinen Aalto University
Albert G. Nasibulin
Albert G. Nasibulin Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the fields of Biology and Biochemistry opens up diverse career opportunities, many of which increasingly benefit from advanced online degrees. For those interested in blending science with administration, cahme accredited online mha programs offer education in healthcare management that is recognized for its rigorous standards. This pathway suits students aiming for leadership roles in hospitals or clinical settings.

Nurses seeking career advancement might consider online dnp programs without clinicals, which allow professionals to gain terminal degrees in nursing practice while maintaining their current roles. Additionally, those looking for executive and academic positions can explore the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs. These programs emphasize high-level leadership and policy-making skills.

For students aiming to specialize in pharmaceuticals, enrolling in an online pharmacy school can provide the credentials needed for roles in research, patient care, or industry settings. Collectively, these online degree options make it possible to build a flexible, impactful career related to biology or biochemistry, all while benefiting from the convenience of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing David Gonzalez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles