World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3207 2949 1545 1398 173 7741

David Atkin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Atkin between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Atkin published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 14 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Atkin: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 3
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 7
1992 6
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 4
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 5
2008 5
2009 5
2010 1
2011 8
2012 5
2013 8
2014 9
2015 12
2016 16
2017 5
2018 5
2019 9
2020 8
2021 7
2022 20
2023 9
2024 10
2025 4
Total 215
Download as CSV

David Atkin publications per year - data summary

  • David Atkin, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Connecticut, has 215 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1993, 1997, 2005 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 5.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.4 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 50 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 43 publications (3.1 per year); 2000-2013: 58 publications (4.1 per year); 2014-2025: 114 publications (9.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

David Atkin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Atkin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 173
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David Atkin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • David Atkin, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Connecticut, records 173 publications - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David Atkin, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and David Atkin falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

David Atkin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Atkin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

David Atkin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • David Atkin, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Connecticut, records 48 D-Index - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David Atkin, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and David Atkin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

David Atkin is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of social sciences, with a particular focus on sociology and political science, communication, demography, and economics. The scientist's work bridges several subfields, including general economics, econometrics, and finance.

Their recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • How Do We Choose Our Identity? A Revealed Preference Approach Using Food Consumption, 2020, Journal of Political Economy
  • Mobile gaming and Internet addiction: When is playing no longer just fun and games?, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Understanding third-person perception about Internet privacy risks, 2020, New Media & Society
  • The Returns to Face-to-Face Interactions: Knowledge Spillovers in Silicon Valley, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Cell Phone Addiction, Anxiety, and Willingness to Communicate in Face-to-Face Encounters, 2020, Communication Reports

David Atkin frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common coauthors include:

  • Hongliang Chen
  • Dongdong Yang
  • Tai-Yee Wu
  • Xiaowen Xu
  • Benjamin Faber

Their works are often published in venues specializing in economics, social sciences, and communication. Prominent publication outlets for their research include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Telematics and Informatics
  • Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
  • Electronic News

The scientist's research topics span several areas related to technology and society. Key topics include:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Studies and Communication
  • Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Global trade and economics
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Best Publications

  • Exports and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

    Unknown

  • Understanding internet adoption as telecommunications behavior

    David J. Atkin;Leo W. Jeffres;Kimberly A. Neuendorf

  • The Influence of Computer-Mediated Communication Apprehension on Motives for Facebook Use

    Daniel Hunt;David Atkin;Archana Krishnan

  • Organizational Barriers to Technology Adoption: Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan

    Unknown

  • Predicting Use of Technologies for Communication and Consumer Needs

    Leo Jeffres;David Atkin

  • Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses

    Carolyn A. Lin;David J. Atkin

  • Parental Mediation and Rulemaking for Adolescent Use of Television and VCRs.

    Carolyn A. Lin;David J. Atkin

  • Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico

    T. Y. Lau;Mira Aboulhoson;Carolyn Lin;David J. Atkin

  • Health anxiety in the digital age

    Carolyn Lagoe;David Atkin

  • The Home Ecology of Children's Televison Viewing: Parental Mediation and the New Video Environment

    David J. Atkin;Bradley S. Greenberg;Thomas F. Baldwin

  • Audiotext and the Re-Invention of the Telephone as a Mass Medium

    Robert LaRose;David Atkin

  • How Do We Choose Our Identity? A Revealed Preference Approach Using Food Consumption

    Unknown

  • Communication Technology and Social Change : Theory and Implications

    Carol A. Lin;David J. Atkin;Jeremy Harris Lipschultz

  • User generated content and credibility evaluation of online health information

    Tao (Jennifer) Ma;David Atkin

  • Satisfaction, demographic, and media environment predictors of cable subscription

    Robert LaRose;David Atkin

  • Diffusion Theory in the New Media Environment: Toward an Integrated Technology Adoption Model

    David J. Atkin;Daniel S. Hunt;Carolyn A. Lin

  • Predicting Political Discussion in a Censored Virtual Environment

    Yi Mou;David Atkin;Hanlong Fu

  • The Caloric Costs of Culture: Evidence from Indian Migrants

    Unknown

  • Adoption of cable amidst a multimedia environment

    David J. Atkin

  • Predictors of Audience Interest in Adopting Digital Television

    David J. Atkin;Kim Neuendorf;Leo W. Jeffres;Paul Skalski

  • Spirals of Silence: Expressing Opinions When the Climate of Opinion Is Unambiguous

    Leo W. Jeffres;Kimberly A. Neuendorf;David Atkin

  • The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites

    Chris Clemens;David Atkin;Archana Krishnan

  • A Model Linking Community Activity and Communication With Political Attitudes and Involvement in Neighborhoods

    Leo W. Jeffres;David Atkin;Kimberly A. Neuendorf

  • Understanding adopters of audio information innovations

    Kimberly A. Neuendorf;David Atkin;Leo W. Jeffres

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly A. Neuendorf
Kimberly A. Neuendorf Cleveland State University
Carolyn A. Lin
Carolyn A. Lin University of Connecticut
Robert LaRose
Robert LaRose Michigan State University
Bradley S. Greenberg
Bradley S. Greenberg Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA, exploring specialized online degrees can offer flexibility and affordability. Many learners are turning to accredited programs that prepare them for rewarding roles in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work.

If you are interested in counseling, check out the best online cacrep counseling programs. These programs offer high-quality education that meets rigorous standards. For aspiring therapists, affordable online mft programs are a great way to enter the field without the heavy financial burden.

Interested in a versatile degree that opens many doors? Choosing a cheap psychology degree online can help you build a foundation for careers in mental health, research, education, or human resources. Those aiming for roles in social advocacy or clinical practice should also explore reputable msw schools to find programs that fit their academic background.

By comparing these online options, you can identify practical pathways that align with your career goals while managing costs and maximizing flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing David Atkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles