World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
134
Citations
79560
World Ranking
2127
National Ranking
1201

Daniel Steinberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Steinberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 377 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel Steinberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Steinberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Steinberg was affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work centered primarily in the field of medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's subfields of study included cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, epidemiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research covered multiple main topics such as cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, cardiovascular function and risk factors, coronary interventions and diagnostics, hemodynamic monitoring and therapy, and pulmonary hypertension research and treatments.

Steinberg had a significant publication record across several noted venues. Frequent publication venues included:

  • Cardiovascular revascularization medicine (5 publications)
  • Radiology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1 publication)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (1 publication)
  • Circulation Heart Failure (1 publication)

They collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, notably:

  • Nicholas Amoroso (7 joint works)
  • Marc Katz (4 joint works)
  • U. Joseph Schoepf (4 joint works)
  • Ákos Varga-Szemes (4 joint works)
  • Ryan J. Tedford (3 joint works)

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Steinberg included:

  • "3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis" (2023) published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in New York City" (2020) published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Role of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure Saturation During Right Heart Catheterization" (2020) published in Circulation Heart Failure
  • "CT in Transcatheter-delivered Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease" (2022) published in Radiology
  • "Coronary CT Fractional Flow Reserve before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Clinical Outcomes" (2021) published in Radiology

Best Publications

  • BEYOND CHOLESTEROL, MODIFICATIONS OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN THAT INCREASE ITS ATHEROGENICITY

    D Steinberg;Sampath Parthasarathy;T. E Carew;J. C Khoo

  • Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis.

    J L Witztum;D Steinberg

  • Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man.

    Seppo Yla-Herttuala;Wulf Palinski;Michael E. Rosenfeld;Sampath Parthasarathy

  • Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids

    Urs P. Steinbrecher;Sampath Parthasarathy;David S. Leake;Joseph L. Witztum

  • Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo

    Wulf Palinski;Michael E. Rosenfeld;Seppo Yla-Herttuala;Geoff C. Gurtner

  • Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults

    DeWitt S. Goodman;Stephen B. Hulley;Luther T. Clark;C. E. Davis

  • Oxidatively modified low density lipoproteins: a potential role in recruitment and retention of monocyte/macrophages during atherogenesis

    Mark T. Quinn;Sampath Parthasarathy;Loren G. Fong;Daniel Steinberg

  • Antiatherogenic effect of probucol unrelated to its hypocholesterolemic effect: evidence that antioxidants in vivo can selectively inhibit low density lipoprotein degradation in macrophage-rich fatty streaks and slow the progression of atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit.

    Thomas E. Carew;Dawn C. Schwenke;Daniel Steinberg

  • Enhanced macrophage degradation of low density lipoprotein previously incubated with cultured endothelial cells: recognition by receptors for acetylated low density lipoproteins.

    Tore Henriksen;Eileen M. Mahoney;Daniel Steinberg

  • Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in macrophage-rich areas of human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions.

    Seppo Ylä-Herttuala;Beth A. Lipton;Michael E. Rosenfeld;Terttu Särkioja

  • Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture Oxidative Modification of LDL and Atherogenesis

    Daniel Steinberg

  • The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an overview.

    Guy M Chisolm;Daniel Steinberg

  • Lysophosphatidylcholine: a chemotactic factor for human monocytes and its potential role in atherogenesis

    Mark T. Quinn;Sampath Parthasarathy;Daniel Steinberg

  • Lipoproteins and atherogenesis. Current concepts

    Daniel Steinberg;Joseph L. Witztum

  • Probucol inhibits oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein.

    S Parthasarathy;S G Young;J L Witztum;R C Pittman

  • Rabbit and human atherosclerotic lesions contain IgG that recognizes epitopes of oxidized LDL.

    S Ylä-Herttuala;W Palinski;S W Butler;S Picard

  • ApoE-deficient mice are a model of lipoprotein oxidation in atherogenesis. Demonstration of oxidation-specific epitopes in lesions and high titers of autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-lysine in serum.

    W Palinski;V A Ord;A S Plump;J L Breslow

  • Is the Oxidative Modification Hypothesis Relevant to Human Atherosclerosis? Do the Antioxidant Trials Conducted to Date Refute the Hypothesis?

    Daniel Steinberg;Joseph L. Witztum

  • Dissociation of tissue uptake of cholesterol ester from that of apoprotein A-I of rat plasma high density lipoprotein: selective delivery of cholesterol ester to liver, adrenal, and gonad

    Christopher Glass;Ray C. Pittman;David B. Weinstein;Daniel Steinberg

  • Enhanced macrophage degradation of biologically modified low density lipoprotein.

    T Henriksen;E M Mahoney;D Steinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph L. Witztum
Joseph L. Witztum University of California, San Diego
Sampath Parthasarathy
Sampath Parthasarathy University of Central Florida
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Augusto D. Pichard
Augusto D. Pichard Georgetown University
Kenneth M. Kent
Kenneth M. Kent MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Lowell F. Satler
Lowell F. Satler MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Oswald Quehenberger
Oswald Quehenberger University of California, San Diego
Wulf Palinski
Wulf Palinski University of California, San Diego
Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
Seppo Ylä-Herttuala University of Eastern Finland
Christopher K. Glass
Christopher K. Glass University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in healthcare and medicine opens a variety of graduate and postgraduate pathways. For students interested in advanced practice or education, exploring the cheapest phd nursing programs can make the highest level of nursing education more accessible and affordable.

If you already hold a registered nurse (RN) license, you might consider the cheapest online rn to bsn programs to earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN). These programs can be completed entirely online and help you advance in your nursing career without a major financial burden.

For those from non-nursing backgrounds interested in transitioning into the field, online msn programs for non nurses provide a unique opportunity to enter nursing at an advanced level. These programs are designed for career changers seeking a fast track into this high-demand field.

If gaining admission is your main concern, learning about what is the easiest nursing school to get into can help you identify programs with less competitive entry requirements. This can be a smart starting point for students entering the medical and nursing professions.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Steinberg