World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
5362
World Ranking
6876
National Ranking
2317

Creighton M. Litton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Creighton M. Litton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Creighton M. Litton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Creighton M. Litton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Creighton M. Litton is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a notable emphasis on nature and landscape conservation, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, as well as plant science and global and planetary change.

The main topics addressed in their work include ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant and animal studies, forest ecology and management, mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, rangeland and wildlife management, and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics.

Creighton M. Litton has contributed to multiple publication venues. Frequent venues include:

  • Restoration Ecology
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Pacific Conservation Biology
  • Biological Conservation
  • Communications Biology

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Christian P. Giardina
  • Susan Cordell
  • Jed P. Sparks
  • Thomas W. Giambelluca
  • Rebecca Ostertag

Among their recent papers are:

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network, 2020, Biological Conservation
  • Hawai'i forest review: Synthesizing the ecology, evolution, and conservation of a model system, 2021, Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • Mycorrhizal feedbacks influence global forest structure and diversity, 2023, Communications Biology
  • Nutrient-use strategy and not competition determines native and invasive species response to changes in soil nutrient availability, 2021, Restoration Ecology
  • Tree Canopies Reflect Mycorrhizal Composition, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems

    Creighton M. Litton;James W. Raich;Michael G. Ryan;Michael G. Ryan

  • Warming-related increases in soil CO2 efflux are explained by increased below-ground carbon flux

    Christian P. Giardina;Christian P. Giardina;Creighton M. Litton;Susan E. Crow;Gregory P. Asner

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Allometric Models for Predicting Aboveground Biomass in Two Widespread Woody Plants in Hawaii

    Creighton M. Litton;J. Boone Kauffman

  • Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA)

    Monica G. Turner;Daniel B. Tinker;William H. Romme;Daniel M. Kashian

  • Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density

    Creighton M Litton;Michael G Ryan;Daniel B Tinker;Dennis H Knight

  • EFFECTS OF TREE DENSITY AND STAND AGE ON CARBON ALLOCATION PATTERNS IN POSTFIRE LODGEPOLE PINE

    Creighton M. Litton;Michael G. Ryan;Dennis H. Knight

  • Below‐ground carbon flux and partitioning: global patterns and response to temperature

    C. M. Litton;C. P. Giardina

  • Effects of non-native grass invasion on aboveground carbon pools and tree population structure in a tropical dry forest of Hawaii

    Creighton M. Litton;Creighton M. Litton;Darren R. Sandquist;Susan Cordell

  • Soil‐surface carbon dioxide efflux and microbial biomass in relation to tree density 13 years after a stand replacing fire in a lodgepole pine ecosystem

    Creighton M. Litton;Michael G. Ryan;Dennis H. Knight;Peter D. Stahl

  • Vegetation Recovery 16 Years after Feral Pig Removal from a Wet Hawaiian Forest

    Rebecca J. Cole;Creighton M. Litton;Michael J. Koontz;Rhonda K. Loh

  • Minimizing Bias in Biomass Allometry: Model Selection and Log‐Transformation of Data

    Joseph Mascaro;Joseph Mascaro;Joseph Mascaro;Creighton M. Litton;R. Flint Hughes;Amanda Uowolo

  • The impacts of degradation, deforestation and restoration on mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks across Cambodia

    Sahadev Sharma;Richard A. MacKenzie;Thida Tieng;Kim Soben

  • Comparison of modeling approaches for carbon partitioning: Impact on estimates of global net primary production and equilibrium biomass of woody vegetation from MODIS GPP

    Takeshi Ise;Creighton M. Litton;Christian P. Giardina;Akihiko Ito

  • Is logarithmic transformation necessary in allometry? Ten, one‐hundred, one‐thousand‐times yes

    Joseph Mascaro;Creighton M. Litton;R. Flint Hughes;Amanda Uowolo

  • Restoration of native plant communities in a Hawaiian dry lowland ecosystem dominated by the invasive grass Megathyrsus maximus.

    Selita A. Ammondt;Creighton M. Litton;Lisa M. Ellsworth;James K. Leary

  • Competition between Native Hawaiian Plants and the Invasive Grass Megathyrsus maximus: Implications of Functional Diversity for Ecological Restoration

    Selita A. Ammondt;Creighton M. Litton

  • Vegetation response to removal of non-native feral pigs from Hawaiian tropical montane wet forest

    Rebecca J. Cole;Rebecca J. Cole;Creighton M. Litton

  • Leaf litter decomposition rates increase with rising mean annual temperature in Hawaiian tropical montane wet forests

    Lori D. Bothwell;Paul C. Selmants;Christian P. Giardina;Creighton M. Litton

  • Non-native mangroves support carbon storage, sediment carbon burial, and accretion of coastal ecosystems.

    Fiona M. Soper;Richard A. MacKenzie;Sahadev Sharma;Thomas G. Cole

  • The Contemporary Scale and Context of Wildfire in Hawai'i

    Clay Trauernicht;Elizabeth Pickett;Christian P. Giardina;Creighton M. Litton

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian P. Giardina
Christian P. Giardina US Forest Service
Susan Cordell
Susan Cordell US Forest Service
Rebecca Ostertag
Rebecca Ostertag University of Hawaii at Hilo
Lawren Sack
Lawren Sack University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas W. Giambelluca
Thomas W. Giambelluca University of Hawaii at Manoa
Michael G. Ryan
Michael G. Ryan Colorado State University
Dennis H. Knight
Dennis H. Knight University of Wyoming
Christopher A. Lepczyk
Christopher A. Lepczyk Auburn University
Gregory P. Asner
Gregory P. Asner Arizona State University
Jed P. Sparks
Jed P. Sparks Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open the door to a range of exciting career pathways. Many students complement their studies with skills from related disciplines. For example, those interested in science communication or design can consider an online graphic design degree to enhance their ability to visualize data and explain complex concepts.

Flexibility is essential for modern learners. An online interdisciplinary studies degree ranking affordable can help students combine environmental, social, and computational skills for unique career profiles. If you wish to advance quickly, options like a quickest cheapest masters degree may let you move into research, teaching, or policy roles with less time and money invested.

For those drawn to information management and science scholarship, understanding the cost of mlis degree us can help you decide if pursuing a library and information science path fits your career goals. Exploring these online degree pathways can help ecology and evolution graduates diversify their expertise and job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Creighton M. Litton

Trending Scientists