World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christen Rune Stensvold

Christen Rune Stensvold

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 63 2779 2547 42 41 198 12373

Christen Rune Stensvold publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christen Rune Stensvold between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christen Rune Stensvold published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 38 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 19 publications
2006 2025

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christen Rune Stensvold: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 8
2008 3
2009 7
2010 4
2011 7
2012 13
2013 19
2014 15
2015 20
2016 19
2017 12
2018 14
2019 10
2020 12
2021 16
2022 22
2023 14
2024 19
2025 19
Total 255
Download as CSV

Christen Rune Stensvold publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christen Rune Stensvold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 198 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 198
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Christen Rune Stensvold D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christen Rune Stensvold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144 63
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Christen Rune Stensvold is affiliated with the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark. Their research work primarily focuses on parasitology and related fields within medicine and immunology. The scholar has contributed notably to areas including parasitic infections and diagnostics, amoebic infections and treatments, and parasitic infections in humans and animals, among other topics.

Their academic output spans several specialized subfields such as parasitology, infectious diseases, pathology and forensic medicine, endocrinology, and molecular biology. The breadth of these subfields aligns with the main fields of study identified as medicine and immunology and microbiology.

Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Trends in Parasitology
  • Microorganisms
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Parasite Epidemiology and Control
  • Protist

Stensvold's recent published papers illustrate central themes in their research. These include:

  • Pre-empting Pandora's Box: Blastocystis Subtypes Revisited, 2020, Trends in Parasitology
  • Blastocystis, 2020, Trends in Parasitology
  • High Diversity of Cryptosporidium Species and Subtypes Identified in Cryptosporidiosis Acquired in Sweden and Abroad, 2021, Pathogens
  • Parasites modulate the gut-microbiome in insects: A proof-of-concept study, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • A Study on the Prevalence and Subtype Diversity of the Intestinal Protist Blastocystis sp. in a Gut-Healthy Human Population in the Czech Republic, 2020, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including Henrik Nielsen, Lee O'Brien Andersen, Pikka Jokelainen, Marianne Lebbad, and Kateřina Jirků-Pomajbíková. Their collaborative network reflects ongoing research activity in parasitology and infectious diseases.

Main research topics addressed by Stensvold's work encompass:

  • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
  • Amoebic Infections and Treatments
  • Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
  • Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Parasites and Host Interactions

Their scientific output has contributed to understanding various parasitic organisms, with focus on Blastocystis and other intestinal protists, including their diversity, epidemiology, and interactions with the host and the microbiome.

Best Publications

  • Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes – a consensus

    C. Rune Stensvold;G. Kumar Suresh;Kevin S.W. Tan;R.C. Andrew Thompson

  • Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications.

    Mohammed A. Alfellani;C. Rune Stensvold;Amparo Vidal-Lapiedra;Emeh Sunday Uche Onuoha

  • Genetic diversity of blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals

    Mohammed A. Alfellani;Derya Taner-Mulla;Alison S. Jacob;Christine Atim Imeede

  • Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view

    C. Rune Stensvold;C. Graham Clark

  • Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype

    C. Rune Stensvold;Mohammed A. Alfellani;Sara Nørskov-Lauritsen;Katrine Prip

  • Recent developments in Blastocystis research.

    C Graham Clark;Mark van der Giezen;Mohammed A Alfellani;Mohammed A Alfellani;C Rune Stensvold

  • The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota

    Pauline D. Scanlan;Christen R. Stensvold;Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović;Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović;Hans G.H.J. Heilig

  • Blastocystis subtypes detected in humans and animals from Colombia

    Juan David Ramírez;Laura Viviana Sánchez;Diana Carolina Bautista;Andrés Felipe Corredor

  • Molecular Testing for Clinical Diagnosis and Epidemiological Investigations of Intestinal Parasitic Infections

    Jaco J. Verweij;C. Rune Stensvold

  • Blastocystis in Health and Disease—Are We Moving from a Clinical to a Public Health Perspective?

    Lee O'Brien Andersen;Christen Rune Stensvold

  • Blastocystis: unravelling potential risk factors and clinical significance of a common but neglected parasite.

    CR Stensvold;HC Lewis;Anette Marie Hammerum;Lone Jannok Porsbo

  • Detecting Blastocystis using parasitologic and DNA-based methods: a comparative study.

    C. Rune Stensvold;Maiken C. Arendrup;Cathrine Jespersgaard;Kåre Mølbak

  • Are Human Intestinal Eukaryotes Beneficial or Commensals

    Julius Lukeš;Christen Rune Stensvold;Kateřina Jirků-Pomajbíková;Laura Wegener Parfrey

  • Levels of genetic diversity vary dramatically between Blastocystis subtypes.

    C. Rune Stensvold;Mohammed Alfellani;C. Graham Clark

  • Pursuing the clinical significance of Blastocystis--diagnostic limitations.

    C. Rune Stensvold;Henrik V. Nielsen;Kåre Mølbak;Huw V. Smith

  • Blastocystis sp. Subtype 4 is Common in Danish Blastocystis-Positive Patients Presenting with Acute Diarrhea

    Christen Rune Stensvold;Dorte Bang Christiansen;Katharina Elisabeth Pribil Olsen;Henrik Vedel Nielsen

  • Associations between Gut Microbiota and Common Luminal Intestinal Parasites

    Christen Rune Stensvold;Mark van der Giezen

  • Detection of Blastocystis hominis in unpreserved stool specimens by using polymerase chain reaction.

    Rune Stensvold;Anna Brillowska-Dabrowska;Henrik Vedel Nielsen;Maiken Cavling Arendrup

  • Blastocystis: getting to grips with our guileful guest

    Pauline D. Scanlan;Christen R. Stensvold

  • Increased Sampling Reveals Novel Lineages of Entamoeba: Consequences of Genetic Diversity and Host Specificity for Taxonomy and Molecular Detection

    C. Rune Stensvold;Marianne Lebbad;Emma L. Victory;Jaco J. Verweij

  • A retrospective metagenomics approach to studying Blastocystis

    Lee O'Brien Andersen;Ida Bonde;Henrik Bjørn Nielsen;Christen Rune Stensvold

  • Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis infections in Turkey.

    Mustafa Özyurt;Özgür Kurt;Kåre Mølbak;Henrik Vedel Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Kåre Mølbak
Kåre Mølbak Statens Serum Institut
Andreas Petersen
Andreas Petersen Copenhagen University Hospital
Karen A. Krogfelt
Karen A. Krogfelt Statens Serum Institut
Maiken Cavling Arendrup
Maiken Cavling Arendrup Statens Serum Institut
Peter Nejsum
Peter Nejsum Aarhus University
Paul D. Cotter
Paul D. Cotter University College Cork
C. Graham Clark
C. Graham Clark London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Rebecca J. Traub
Rebecca J. Traub City University of Hong Kong
Maria Vang Johansen
Maria Vang Johansen University of Copenhagen
Pierre Dorny
Pierre Dorny Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Microbiology, several related online degrees offer promising career prospects. Fields like health information management combine healthcare knowledge with data expertise. Exploring health information management jobs salary can provide insights into the earning potential and career growth in this sector.

If you are considering formal education in this area, it’s important to choose accredited programs. The best online cahiim accredited health information management degree programs ensure quality and recognition, increasing job marketability after graduation.

Additionally, for those seeking quicker certification options, online medical billing and coding certificate fast programs can provide essential qualifications in a shortened timeframe, perfect for starting a healthcare career efficiently.

Lastly, a variety of online medical programs are now available, helping students access diverse healthcare fields remotely. These opportunities make advancing in related disciplines more accessible than ever for Microbiology graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Christen Rune Stensvold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles