World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
13043
World Ranking
13726
National Ranking
151

Andreas Petersen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Petersen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 234 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Andreas Petersen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Petersen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Petersen is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research output spans 64 publications in medicine and 29 in biochemistry and related fields. The subfields of study prominently covered in their work include infectious diseases, clinical biochemistry, molecular biology, surgery, and epidemiology.

The scientist's research addresses multiple topics, most notably antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, orthopedic infections and treatments, rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and bacteriophages and microbial interactions.

Andreas Petersen has collaborated frequently with a range of co-authors including Anders Rhod Larsen (15 joint publications), Thomas Benfield (8), Christian Torp-Pedersen (6), Raphael N. Sieber (5), and Barbara Juliane Holzknecht (5).

Their work has been published in various notable scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Microbiology Spectrum (3 papers), Epidemiology and Infection (2 papers), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2 papers), Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2 papers), and Nature (1 paper).

Recent papers by Andreas Petersen include the following:

  • "Emergence of methicillin resistance predates the clinical use of antibiotics," 2022, Nature
  • "Phage-Mediated Immune Evasion and Transmission of Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Humans," 2020, Emerging infectious diseases
  • "COVID-19 preventive measures coincided with a marked decline in other infectious diseases in Denmark, spring 2020," 2022, Epidemiology and Infection
  • "Increased risk of incident primary cancer after Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia," 2020, Medicine
  • "Increasing Incidences and Clonal Diversity of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Nordic Countries - Results From the Nordic MRSA Surveillance," 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology

Best Publications

  • Origins of the E. coli Strain Causing an Outbreak of Hemolytic–Uremic Syndrome in Germany

    David A. Rasko;Dale R. Webster;Jason W. Sahl;Ali Bashir

  • An outbreak of multidrug-resistant, quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT104

    Kåre Mølbak;Dorte Lau Baggesen;Frank Møller Aarestrup;Jens Munk Ebbesen

  • DANMAP 2013: Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark

    Yvonne Agersø;Flemming Bager;Jeppe Boel;Birgitte Helwigh

  • Escherichia coli Pathobionts Associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

    Hengameh Chloé Mirsepasi-Lauridsen;Bruce Andrew Vallance;Karen Angeliki Krogfelt;Andreas Munk Petersen

  • Virulence factors for hemolytic uremic syndrome, Denmark.

    Steen Ethelberg;Katharina E. P. Olsen;Flemming Scheutz;Charlotte Jensen

  • Genomic epidemiology of the Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreaks in Europe, 2011

    Yonatan H. Grad;Marc Lipsitch;Marc Lipsitch;Michael Feldgarden;Harindra M. Arachchi

  • Antibiotic Resistance in Acinetobacter spp. Isolated from Sewers Receiving Waste Effluent from a Hospital and a Pharmaceutical Plant

    Luca Guardabassi;Andreas Petersen;John E. Olsen;Anders Dalsgaard

  • Impact of Integrated Fish Farming on Antimicrobial Resistance in a Pond Environment

    Andreas Petersen;Jens Strodl Andersen;Tawatchai Kaewmak;Temdoung Somsiri

  • Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study

    Sofie Ingdam Halkjær;Alice Højer Christensen;Bobby Zhao Sheng Lo;Patrick Denis Browne

  • Whole genome sequencing identifies zoonotic transmission of MRSA isolates with the novel mecA homologue mecC.

    Ewan M. Harrison;Gavin K. Paterson;Matthew Thomas Geoffrey Holden;Jesper Larsen

  • Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans

    A Petersen;Mikael Ruge Stegger;O Heltberg;J Christensen

  • Comparing Whole-Genome Sequencing with Sanger Sequencing for spa Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Mette Damkjær Bartels;Andreas Petersen;Peder Worning;Jesper Boye Nielsen

  • Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

    Betina Hebbelstrup Jensen;Katharina E. P. Olsen;Carsten Struve;Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

  • The association between the gut microbiota and the inflammatory bowel disease activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Michelle Prosberg;Flemming Bendtsen;Ida Vind;Andreas M Petersen

  • Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to 2011.

    Jesper Larsen;Andreas Petersen;Marit Sørum;Marc Stegger

  • Helicobacter pylori: an invading microorganism? A review.

    Andreas Munk Petersen;Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

  • Invasive listeriosis in Denmark 1994–2003: a review of 299 cases with special emphasis on risk factors for mortality

    P. Gerner-Smidt;S. Ethelberg;P. Schiellerup;J.J. Christensen

  • Short-Course Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Treatment Impacts Innate Immunity and Plasma Viremia in Individuals With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

    Line Vibholm;Line Vibholm;Mariane H. Schleimann;Mariane H. Schleimann;Jesper F. Højen;Jesper F. Højen;Thomas Benfield

  • Ciprofloxacin and probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle add-on treatment in active ulcerative colitis: A double-blind randomized placebo controlled clinical trial

    Andreas Munk Petersen;Hengameh Mirsepasi;Sofie Ingdam Halkjær;Esben Munk Mortensen

  • DANMAP 2017 - Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark

    Birgitte Borck Høg;Flemming Bager;Helle Bisgaard Korsgaard;Johanne Ellis-Iversen

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen A. Krogfelt
Karen A. Krogfelt Statens Serum Institut
Anders Rhod Larsen
Anders Rhod Larsen Statens Serum Institut
Robert Skov
Robert Skov Statens Serum Institut
Thomas Benfield
Thomas Benfield Copenhagen University Hospital
Henrik Westh
Henrik Westh University of Copenhagen
Paal Skytt Andersen
Paal Skytt Andersen Statens Serum Institut
Marc Stegger
Marc Stegger Statens Serum Institut
Eva Møller Nielsen
Eva Møller Nielsen Statens Serum Institut
Sharon J. Peacock
Sharon J. Peacock University of Cambridge
Anette M. Hammerum
Anette M. Hammerum Statens Serum Institut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Biology and Biochemistry, many related careers exist beyond traditional laboratory and research roles. One fast-growing sector is health information management, which often requires knowledge of medical terminology and biological processes.

Online education makes it easier than ever to get started. If you're looking for an affordable way to enter this field, consider programs from the most affordable online health information management degree options. Such degrees can lead to careers in medical coding and billing—a vital part of the healthcare system.

Job prospects for these positions are strong. According to recent data, the medical billing and coding job outlook is positive, with high demand in hospitals, clinics, and insurance firms.

If you're comparing entry requirements or potential earnings, it helps to know the ccs vs cpc salary differences. Certifications such as CCS or CPC open doors to specialized roles.

Finally, many prospective students ask about medical coder salary and growth potential. With the right education and certification, this career pathway offers steady income and clear advancement opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles