World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
12476
World Ranking
13146
National Ranking
365

Qin Cheng publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qin Cheng sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 133 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Qin Cheng D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qin Cheng sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Qin Cheng is affiliated with the Department of Defence in Australia and has an academic focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their work also spans related subfields including General Health Professions, Parasitology, Pharmacology, and Finance.

Their research contributions largely concentrate on malaria research and control, mosquito-borne diseases and control, global health care issues, healthcare systems and reforms, employment and welfare studies, parasites and host interactions, as well as computational drug discovery methods.

Cheng has published numerous papers across a variety of venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Malaria Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • Frontiers in Public Health

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • Research Global sequence variation in the histidine-rich proteins 2 and 3 of Plasmodium falciparum: implications for the performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests, 2021, Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)
  • Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum lacking histidine-rich proteins 2 and 3: a systematic review, 2020, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • Impact of Plasmodium falciparum gene deletions on malaria rapid diagnostic test performance, 2020, Malaria Journal
  • Limitations of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria surveys in areas with varied transmission intensity in Uganda 2017-2019: Implications for selection and use of HRP2 RDTs, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The changing epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax: Insights from conventional and novel surveillance tools, 2021, PLoS Medicine

Qin Cheng has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Jane Cunningham
  • David J. Smith
  • Karen Anderson
  • Michelle L. Gatton
  • Bosco Agaba

Best Publications

  • Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax

    Jane M. Carlton;Jane M. Carlton;John H. Adams;Joana C. Silva;Shelby L. Bidwell

  • A Large Proportion of P. falciparum Isolates in the Amazon Region of Peru Lack pfhrp2 and pfhrp3: Implications for Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests

    Dionicia Gamboa;Mei-Fong Ho;Jorge Bendezu;Katherine Torres

  • Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome b that are associated with atovaquone resistance are located at a putative drug-binding site.

    Michael Korsinczky;Nanhua Chen;Barbara Kotecka;Allan Saul

  • A large proportion of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections with low and sub-microscopic parasite densities in the low transmission setting of Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: challenges for malaria diagnostics in an elimination setting

    Ivor Harris;Wesley W Sharrock;Wesley W Sharrock;Lisa M Bain;Lisa M Bain;Karen-Ann Gray

  • Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (PfHRP2) and Its Effect on the Performance of PfHRP2-Based Rapid Diagnostic Tests

    Joanne Baker;James McCarthy;Michelle Gatton;Dennis E. Kyle

  • Targeting vivax malaria in the Asia Pacific: The Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network Vivax Working Group

    NM Anstey;S Auburn;JK Baird;KE Battle

  • stevor and rif are Plasmodium falciparum multicopy gene families which potentially encode variant antigens.

    Qin Cheng;Nicole Cloonan;Katja Fischer;Jenny Thompson

  • Chloroquine Resistant Plasmodium vivax: In Vitro Characterisation and Association with Molecular Polymorphisms

    Rossarin Suwanarusk;Bruce Russell;Marina Chavchich;Ferryanto Chalfein

  • Artemisinin-induced dormancy in Plasmodium falciparum: duration, recovery rates, and implications in treatment failure.

    Franka Teuscher;Michelle L. Gatton;Nanhua Chen;Jennifer Peters

  • Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting

    Qin Cheng;Michelle L Gatton;John Barnwell;Peter Chiodini

  • Relapses of Plasmodium vivax Infection Result from Clonal Hypnozoites Activated at Predetermined Intervals

    Nanhua Chen;Alyson Auliff;Karl Rieckmann;Michelle Gatton

  • Major Threat to Malaria Control Programs by Plasmodium falciparum Lacking Histidine-Rich Protein 2, Eritrea.

    Araia Berhane;Karen Anderson;Selam Mihreteab;Karryn Gresty

  • Global sequence variation in the histidine-rich proteins 2 and 3 of Plasmodium falciparum: implications for the performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests

    Joanne Baker;Mei-Fong Ho;Anita Pelecanos;Michelle Gatton

  • Effect of Sequence Variation in Plasmodium falciparum Histidine- Rich Protein 2 on Binding of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies: Implications for Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria

    Nelson Lee;Joanne Baker;Katherine Thea Andrews;Michelle L. Gatton

  • Plasmodium knowlesi in human, Indonesian Borneo.

    Melanie Figtree;Rogan Lee;Lisa Bain;Tom Kennedy

  • Measurement of Plasmodium falciparum Growth Rates in Vivo: A Test of Malaria Vaccines

    Qin Cheng;Gregor Lawrence;Carol Reed;Anthony Stowers

  • Transcription and expression of plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich proteins in different stages and strains: implications for rapid diagnostic tests

    Joanne Baker;Michelle L. Gatton;Jennifer Peters;Mei-Fong Ho

  • Amplification of pvmdr1 Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Plasmodium vivax

    Rossarin Suwanarusk;Marina Chavchich;Bruce Russell;A Jaidee

  • Therapeutic Efficacies of Artesunate-Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine and Chloroquine-Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine in Vivax Malaria Pilot Studies: Relationship to Plasmodium vivax dhfr Mutations

    Emiliana Tjitra;Joanne Baker;Sri Suprianto;Qin Cheng

  • Determinants of in vitro drug susceptibility testing of Plasmodium vivax.

    B. Russell;F. Chalfein;B. Prasetyorini;E. Kenangalem

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle L. Gatton
Michelle L. Gatton Queensland University of Technology
James S. McCarthy
James S. McCarthy Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Ric N. Price
Ric N. Price Charles Darwin University
Allan Saul
Allan Saul Burnet Institute
Sarah Auburn
Sarah Auburn Charles Darwin University
Nicholas M. Anstey
Nicholas M. Anstey Charles Darwin University
Dennis E. Kyle
Dennis E. Kyle University of Georgia
Peter L. Chiodini
Peter L. Chiodini London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Bruce Russell
Bruce Russell University of Otago
Chris Drakeley
Chris Drakeley London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up diverse online degree opportunities to further your studies and advance your career. Students interested in healthcare leadership might consider doctoral programs for healthcare administration, which prepare graduates for executive roles in healthcare systems and organizations.

For those aiming to work in pharmacy, pursuing an online pharmd can provide the flexibility needed to balance studies with professional life, while meeting the rigorous standards required for pharmacists in the United States.

Additionally, students with a passion for fitness and human movement may be interested in a sports science degree online. This pathway supports careers in coaching, athletic training, and health promotion. For those wanting to focus more broadly on the science of body movement, an online kinesiology bachelor's degree offers excellent preparation for roles in education, rehabilitation, or fitness industries.

Overall, the flexibility of online programs allows students to access specialized knowledge and grow their careers in ever-evolving fields connected to Biology and Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Qin Cheng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles