World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 71 1883 1716 63 62 234 14815

John Ellis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Ellis between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Ellis published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 7 of the 262 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

262 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Ellis: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 4
1992 1
1993 5
1994 5
1995 4
1996 5
1997 8
1998 5
1999 7
2000 11
2001 3
2002 9
2003 6
2004 4
2005 10
2006 6
2007 10
2008 7
2009 9
2010 9
2011 8
2012 10
2013 11
2014 17
2015 9
2016 5
2017 7
2018 6
2019 13
2020 8
2021 9
2022 7
2023 6
2024 4
2025 6
2026 1
Total 262
Download as CSV

John Ellis publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ellis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 234 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155 234
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

John Ellis D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ellis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93 71
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1983 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John Ellis is a researcher affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their work spans several interconnected fields within medical and biological sciences, with a strong focus on parasitology and infectious diseases.

The main fields of study for Ellis include Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. More specialized subfields within their research encompass Parasitology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, and Ecology.

Research topics covered by Ellis frequently involve parasitic infections and diagnostics, malaria research and control, studies on Toxoplasma gondii, parasite biology and host interactions, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, microbial infections and disease research, and leishmaniasis studies.

Ellis has collaborated extensively with a number of co-authors, including Paul Kennedy, Damien Stark, Stephen J. Goodswen, Rogan Lee, and Alexa Kaufer.

Their publications have appeared in a variety of scientific journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Parasitology
  • Current Research in Parasitology and Vector-Borne Diseases
  • Pathogens
  • FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • Parasites & Vectors

Among recent papers associated with Ellis are:

  • "Machine learning and applications in microbiology," 2021, FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • "A guide to current methodology and usage of reverse vaccinology towards in silico vaccine discovery," 2023, FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • "A close shave? Performance of P2/N95 respirators in healthcare workers with facial hair: results of the BEARDS (BEnchmarking Adequate Respiratory DefenceS) study," 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection
  • "Laboratory diagnostics for human Leishmania infections: a polymerase chain reaction-focussed review of detection and identification methods," 2022, Parasites & Vectors
  • "Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2 and 3 Gene Deletions in Strains from Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan," 2021, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Ellis has been recognized with fellowships from major scientific organizations including the Royal Society in the United Kingdom (1983) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1963).

Best Publications

  • Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species

    R. Fotedar;D. Stark;N. Beebe;D. Marriott

  • What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle - the billion dollar question.

    Michael P. Reichel;M. Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca;Luis Fernando Pita Gondim;John T. Ellis

  • Enteric protozoa in the developed world: a public health perspective.

    Stephanie M. Fletcher;Damien Stark;Damien Stark;John Harkness;John Harkness;John Ellis

  • Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of apicomplexa.

    D A Morrison;J T Ellis

  • Redescription of Neospora caninum and its differentiation from related coccidia.

    J P Dubey;B C Barr;J R Barta;I Bjerkås

  • Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum.

    Jessica S. King;Jan Šlapeta;David J. Jenkins;Sarwat E. Al-Qassab

  • Clinical Significance of Enteric Protozoa in the Immunosuppressed Human Population

    D. Stark;D. Stark;J. L. N. Barratt;J. L. N. Barratt;S. van Hal;D. Marriott;D. Marriott

  • Irritable bowel syndrome: A review on the role of intestinal protozoa and the importance of their detection and diagnosis

    D. Stark;S. van Hal;D. Marriott;J. Ellis

  • Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen.

    Joel Barratt;Douglas Chan;Indy Sandaradura;Richard Malik

  • The evolution of trypanosomatid taxonomy

    Alexa Kaufer;John Ellis;Damien Stark;Joel Barratt

  • Update on the pathogenic potential and treatment options for Blastocystis sp

    Tamalee Roberts;Tamalee Roberts;Damien Stark;John Harkness;John Ellis

  • Prevalence of gastrointestinal pathogens in developed and developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Stephanie M. Fletcher;Mary-Louise McLaws;John T. Ellis

  • A review of the infection, genetics, and evolution of Neospora caninum: From the past to the present

    Stephen J. Goodswen;Paul J. Kennedy;John T. Ellis

  • Evolution of the genus Leishmania revealed by comparison of DNA and RNA polymerase gene sequences.

    David G Croan;David A Morrison;John T Ellis

  • Neospora abortions in dairy cattle: diagnosis, mode of transmission and control.

    C. A. Hall;M. P. Reichel;J. T. Ellis

  • Machine learning and applications in microbiology.

    Stephen J Goodswen;Joel L N Barratt;Paul J Kennedy;Alexa Kaufer

  • PCR Detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii in Stool Samples from Sydney, Australia

    R. Fotedar;D. Stark;N. W. Beebe;D. Marriott

  • Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples

    D. Stark;S. E. Al-Qassab;J. L. N. Barratt;J. L. N. Barratt;K. Stanley

  • Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in different canid populations.

    J. S. Barber;R. B. Gasser;R. B. Gasser;J. Ellis;J. Ellis;M. P. Reichel;M. P. Reichel

  • A Review of the Clinical Presentation of Dientamoebiasis

    Damien Stark;Joel Barratt;Tamalee Roberts;Deborah Marriott

  • The phylogeny of Neospora caninum.

    John Ellis;Kim Luton;Peter R. Baverstock;Paul J. Brindley

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Marriott
Deborah Marriott Ascension Health
Michael P. Reichel
Michael P. Reichel City University of Hong Kong
Nigel W. Beebe
Nigel W. Beebe University of Queensland
Peter A. Windsor
Peter A. Windsor University of Sydney
Jan Šlapeta
Jan Šlapeta University of Sydney
Jitender P. Dubey
Jitender P. Dubey Agricultural Research Service
Wieland Meyer
Wieland Meyer Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
Alexander J. Trees
Alexander J. Trees University of Liverpool
David Jenkins
David Jenkins Charles Sturt University
Mark C. Jenkins
Mark C. Jenkins United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online medical programs can be a great way for students interested in microbiology to expand their knowledge and career prospects without relocating. Many reputable universities now offer flexible options that blend theoretical learning with practical applications, making advanced medical education more accessible.

For those considering public health, understanding which online MPH programs are easiest to get into can help streamline the application process. This can be particularly useful for microbiology students aiming to focus on epidemiology or infectious disease control within a public health framework.

Career options linked to microbiology also extend to specialized roles such as child life specialists, where understanding the child specialist salary and job outlook is important. Professionals in this area often incorporate microbiological knowledge when working with pediatric patients, especially in clinical or hospital settings.

Additionally, individuals with diverse backgrounds should explore the best associate degrees for felons, as these programs can offer a valuable pathway into microbiology-related fields. This ensures inclusivity and broadens opportunities for those seeking a fresh start in scientific careers.

Best Scientists Citing John Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles