World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles F. Halverson

Charles F. Halverson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11108 5806 66 5901

Charles F. Halverson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles F. Halverson between 1969 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles F. Halverson published across 51 years, from 1969 to 2019, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1983. 1 of the 67 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1983. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1969 2019

67 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles F. Halverson: publications per year, 1969 to 2019
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 1
1975 2
1976 4
1977 1
1978 3
1979 0
1980 6
1981 2
1982 0
1983 7
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 4
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 2
2013 0
2014 2
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 67
Download as CSV

Charles F. Halverson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Halverson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 66
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles F. Halverson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Halverson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles F. Halverson was affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the fields of Physics and Astronomy, with a specialization in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. This specialization encompassed theoretical and experimental studies in particle physics as well as research on quantum chromodynamics and particle interactions.

The main topics of their work included:

  • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Nuclear physics research studies

Halverson authored publications predominantly in the journal PubMed. One of their recent papers was titled "^{133}In: A Rosetta Stone for Decays of r-Process Nuclei." published in 2023.

The known frequent co-authors who contributed alongside Halverson were:

  • Xu Zhang
  • M. Madurga
  • R. Grzywacz
  • T. King
  • A. Algora

The work involved in the research often related to cutting-edge experimental studies involving nuclear decay processes and the fundamental interactions of particles under extreme conditions found in nuclear physics.

Halverson's career reflected a focus on interdisciplinary undertakings linking the theoretical frameworks of quantum chromodynamics with practical nuclear physics experiments. Their contributions added to a deeper understanding of particle behavior and nuclear decay pathways critical to astrophysical processes.

Best Publications

  • A Schematic Processing Model of Sex Typing and Stereotyping in Children

    Carol Lynn Martin;Charles F. Halverson

  • The Developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood

    Charles F. Halverson Jr.;Geldolph A. Kohnstamm;Roy P. Martin

  • Personality Structure as Derived From Parental Ratings of Free Descriptions of Children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences

    Charles F Halverson;Valerie L Havill;James Deal;Spencer R Baker

  • The effects of sex-typing schemas on young children's memory.

    Carol Lynn Martin;Charles F. Halverson

  • Intensive and extensive peer behavior: Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses.

    Mary F. Waldrop;Charles F. Halverson

  • Parental Descriptions of Child Personality : Developmental Antecedents of the Big Five?

    Geldolph A. Kohnstamm;Charles F. Halverson Jr.;Ivan Mervielde;Valerie L. Havill

  • The Hierarchical Structure of Childhood Personality in Five Countries: Continuity From Early Childhood to Early Adolescence

    Jennifer L. Tackett;Helena R. Slobodskaya;Raymond A. Mar;James Deal

  • Newborn minor physical anomalies predict short attention span, peer aggression, and impulsivity at age 3

    Mary F. Waldrop;Richard Q. Bell;Brian McLaughlin;Charles F. Halverson

  • Parental agreement on child-rearing orientations: relations to parental, marital, family, and child characteristics.

    James E. Deal;Charles F. Halverson;Karen Smith Wampler

  • Review of Factor Analytic Studies of Temperament Measures Based on the Thomas-Chess Structural Model: Implications for the Big Five

    Charles F. Halverson;Gedolph A. Kohnstamm;Roy P. Martin;Geldolph A. Kohnstamm

  • The Relations of Mechanically Recorded Activity Level to Varieties of Preschool Play Behavior.

    Charles F. Halverson;Mary F. Waldrop

  • Affective Self-disclosure and Marital Adjustment: A Test of Equity Theory

    Bernard Davidson;Jack Balswick;Charles Halverson

  • The importance of similarity in the marital relationship.

    James E. Deal;Karen Smith Wampler;Charles F. Halverson

  • Change in Depressive Symptoms in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

    Adam Davey;Charles F. Halverson;Alan B. Zonderman;Paul T. Costa

  • Influence of Sex Stereotypes on Children's Exploration and Memory. A Competence Versus Performance Distinction

    Marilyn R. Bradbard;Carol Lynn Martin;Richard C. Endsley;Charles F. Halverson

  • Maternal behavior toward own and other preschool children: The problem of "ownness."

    Charles F. Halverson;Mary F. Waldrop

  • The Inventory of Children's Individual Differences: development and validation of a short version.

    James E. Deal;Charles F. Halverson;Roy P. Martin;James Victor

  • Relations between preschool activity and aspects of intellectual and social behavior at age 71/2.

    Unknown

  • Self-Disclosure and Interpersonal Functioning.

    Charles F. Halverson;Roy E. Shore

  • Situational context of emotional expressiveness.

    David A. Dosser;Jack O. Balswick;Charles F. Halverson

  • A re-examination of the validity and reliability of the School-Age Temperament Inventory.

    Sandra Graham McClowry;Charles F. Halverson;Ann Sanson

  • Gender constancy: A methodological and theoretical analysis

    Carol Lynn Martin;Charles F. Halverson

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Lynn Martin
Carol Lynn Martin Arizona State University
Ivan Mervielde
Ivan Mervielde Ghent University
Jennifer L. Tackett
Jennifer L. Tackett Northwestern University
Adam Davey
Adam Davey University of Delaware
Paul T. Costa
Paul T. Costa Duke University
Peter Martin
Peter Martin Iowa State University
Raymond A. Mar
Raymond A. Mar York University
Alan B. Zonderman
Alan B. Zonderman National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of affordable options, making higher education more accessible than ever before. Many universities now offer flexible online programs that let you balance your studies with work or family commitments.

For budget-conscious students, researching the cheapest psychology programs in Tuscaloosa or looking into affordable psychology degrees in Texas can help minimize student debt. Similar opportunities exist across the country, such as affordable psychology degrees in University Park and the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah. These programs often offer the same rigorous curriculum as their on-campus counterparts.

Graduates with a psychology degree can pursue a variety of career pathways in counseling, social services, education, human resources, or business. Many roles do not require licensure, allowing graduates to start working immediately, while others—like clinical psychology—may require advanced study. Researching affordable options helps you maximize your investment and start your career with minimal financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Charles F. Halverson

Recently Published Articles