World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3008
World Ranking
8157
National Ranking
31

Carlos F. Gaymer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos F. Gaymer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Carlos F. Gaymer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos F. Gaymer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carlos F. Gaymer is affiliated with Universidad Católica del Norte in Chile and focuses their research primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their work covers various subfields, including Ecology, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Geography, Planning and Development.

The main topics addressed by Gaymer's research include:

  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses

Gaymer has contributed extensively to the academic literature, with frequent publications appearing in venues such as:

  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
  • Marine Policy
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some recent publications include:

  • Socio-environmental conflicts: An underestimated threat to biodiversity conservation in Chile, 2020, Environmental Science & Policy
  • A large-scale marine protected area for the sea of Rapa Nui: From ocean grabbing to legitimacy, 2020, Ocean & Coastal Management
  • The Salas y Gómez and Nazca ridges: A review of the importance, opportunities and challenges for protecting a global diversity hotspot on the high seas, 2021, Marine Policy
  • Progress, opportunities and challenges for marine conservation in the Pacific Islands, 2020, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
  • The hidden landscape: Maritime cultural heritage of the Salas y Gómez and Nazca ridges with implications for conservation on the high seas, 2021, Marine Policy

They collaborate frequently with other researchers, notably including:

  • Alan M. Friedlander
  • Daniel Wagner
  • Francisco A. Squeo
  • Naití Morales
  • Javier Sellanes

Best Publications

  • The humboldt current system of northern and central chile : Oceanographic processes, ecological interactions and socioeconomic feedback

    Martin Thiel;Erasmo C. Macaya;Enzo Acuna;Wolf E. Arntz

  • Large marine protected areas – advantages and challenges of going big

    T. 'Aulani Wilhelm;Charles R. C. Sheppard;Anne L. S. Sheppard;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Merging top-down and bottom-up approaches in marine protected areas planning: experiences from around the globe

    Carlos F. Gaymer;Angela V. Stadel;Natalie C. Ban;P. Francisco Cárcamo

  • One size does not fit all: The emerging frontier in large-scale marine conservation

    Robert J. Toonen;T. ‘Aulani Wilhelm;Sara M. Maxwell;Daniel Wagner

  • Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis

    C. P. Dumont;C. P. Dumont;C. F. Gaymer;M. Thiel

  • An Appeal for a Code of Conduct for Marine Conservation

    Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Lydia Teh;Yoshitaka Ota;Patrick Christie

  • Effects of isolation and fishing on the marine ecosystems of Easter Island and Salas y Gómez, Chile

    Alan M. Friedlander;Enric Ballesteros;Jim Beets;Eric Berkenpas

  • Using stakeholders' perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area

    P. Francisco Cárcamo;Rosa Garay-Flühmann;Francisco A. Squeo;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Distribution and feeding ecology of the seastars Leptasterias polaris and Asterias vulgaris in the northern Gulf of St Lawrence, Canada

    Carlos F. Gaymer;John H. Himmelman;Ladd E. Johnson

  • Spawning synchrony and aggregative behaviour of cold-water echinoderms during multi-species mass spawnings

    John H. Himmelman;Clément P. Dumont;Carlos F. Gaymer;Catherine Vallières

  • Towards the creation of an integrated system of protected areas in Chile: achievements and challenges

    Francisco A. Squeo;Rodrigo A. Estévez;Alexandra Stoll;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Socio-environmental conflicts: An underestimated threat to biodiversity conservation in Chile

    Daniela M. Carranza;Katerina Varas-Belemmi;Diamela De Veer;Claudia Iglesias-Müller

  • Prey selection and predatory impact of four major sea stars on a soft bottom subtidal community

    Carlos F. Gaymer;Claudine Dutil;John H. Himmelman

  • A keystone predatory sea star in the intertidal zone is controlled by a higher-order predatory sea star in the subtidal zone

    Carlos F. Gaymer;John H. Himmelman

  • In search for the sources of plastic marine litter that contaminates the Easter Island Ecoregion.

    Simon Jan van Gennip;Boris Dewitte;Véronique Garçon;Martin Thiel

  • Effect of the degree of autotomy on feeding, growth, and reproductive capacity in the multi-armed sea star Heliaster helianthus

    Jorge V. Barrios;Carlos F. Gaymer;Julio A. Vásquez;Katherina B. Brokordt

  • Anthropogenic structures as a spatial refuge from predation for the invasive bryozoan Bugula neritina

    Clément P. Dumont;Larry G. Harris;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Protected areas in Chile: are we managing them?

    Ignacio J. Petit;Ana N. Campoy;Maria-Jose Hevia;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Marine Biodiversity in Juan Fernández and Desventuradas Islands, Chile: Global Endemism Hotspots

    Alan M. Friedlander;Enric Ballesteros;Jennifer E. Caselle;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Domestication reduces the capacity to escape from predators

    Katherina B. Brokordt;Miriam Fernández;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Collaboration and knowledge networks in coastal resources management: How critical stakeholders interact for multiple-use marine protected area implementation

    P. Francisco Cárcamo;Rosa Garay-Flühmann;Carlos F. Gaymer

  • Effect of intra- and interspecific interactions on the feeding behavior of two subtidal sea stars

    Carlos F. Gaymer;John H. Himmelman;Ladd E. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan M. Friedlander
Alan M. Friedlander University of Hawaii at Manoa
John H. Himmelman
John H. Himmelman Université Laval
Martin Thiel
Martin Thiel Catholic University of the North
Charles Sheppard
Charles Sheppard University of Warwick
Ladd E. Johnson
Ladd E. Johnson Université Laval
Nathan J. Bennett
Nathan J. Bennett University of British Columbia
Véronique Garçon
Véronique Garçon Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Miriam Fernández
Miriam Fernández Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
John M. Lawrence
John M. Lawrence University of South Florida
Boris Dewitte
Boris Dewitte Center for Advanced Studies in Arid Zones (CEAZA)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution may consider broadening their expertise and career options with online degrees in related fields. Many opt to pursue nursing or healthcare degrees, which share overlapping skills in research, data analysis, and biological sciences. Comparing programs such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you weigh curriculum strengths, flexibility, and support services before choosing the right program for your lifestyle and goals.

For those seeking advanced specialization, looking for the cheapest bsn to msn online options is important for keeping education affordable. In all cases, choosing programs from nonprofit online colleges ensures accreditation and often greater academic credibility, which can benefit your long-term career prospects.

Furthermore, prospective students with military backgrounds may prefer institutions recognized as military friendly online colleges, which offer additional support and resources for service members and veterans. Exploring these pathways can help Ecology and Evolution graduates transition into diverse scientific, conservation, or healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Carlos F. Gaymer

Trending Scientists