World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 58 1371 1259 52 49 224 10730

Blanca B. Landa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Blanca B. Landa between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Blanca B. Landa published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2011. 42 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2011. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 24 publications
1997 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Blanca B. Landa: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 9
2007 8
2008 8
2009 8
2010 10
2011 28
2012 4
2013 9
2014 17
2015 14
2016 17
2017 18
2018 13
2019 21
2020 14
2021 20
2022 15
2023 5
2024 18
2025 24
Total 295
Download as CSV

Blanca B. Landa publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blanca B. Landa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–225 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 224 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61 224
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Blanca B. Landa D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blanca B. Landa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91 58
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

Rhizosphere, Botany, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Agronomy and Fusarium wilt are her primary areas of study. Her Rhizosphere research entails a greater understanding of Bacteria. Much of her study explores Botany relationship to Paenibacillus.

Her Pseudomonas fluorescens study incorporates themes from Inoculation, Pseudomonas, 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol, Pseudomonadaceae and Rhizobacteria. Her study explores the link between Inoculation and topics such as Microbiology that cross with problems in Bacteroides and Gut flora. Her work in Crop, Monoculture and Cultivar are all subfields of Agronomy research.

Her most cited work include:

  • Intestinal Microbiota Is Influenced by Gender and Body Mass Index. (267 citations)
  • Role of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in the defense of plant roots. (180 citations)
  • Differential Ability of Genotypes of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Producing Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains To Colonize the Roots of Pea Plants (147 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Blanca B. Landa focuses on Botany, Agronomy, Horticulture, Rhizosphere and Xylella fastidiosa. The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Nematode and Ribosomal DNA, Phylogenetic tree. Tillage and Soil texture is closely connected to Soil management in her research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Agronomy.

Blanca B. Landa interconnects Soil organic matter, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Monoculture in the investigation of issues within Rhizosphere. Her Pseudomonas fluorescens research also works with subjects such as

  • 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol which intersects with area such as Genotype,
  • Microbiology which intersects with area such as Verticillium dahliae. Blanca B. Landa has researched Xylella fastidiosa in several fields, including Subspecies, Olive trees and Genetic diversity.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (42.77%)
  • Agronomy (21.08%)
  • Horticulture (16.27%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Xylella fastidiosa (10.84%)
  • Subspecies (4.82%)
  • Xylem (4.22%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her main research concerns Xylella fastidiosa, Subspecies, Xylem, Genetics and Olive trees. In her study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Xylella fastidiosa, Clade, Internal transcribed spacer and Zoology is strongly linked to Outbreak. As part of one scientific family, Blanca B. Landa deals mainly with the area of Subspecies, narrowing it down to issues related to the Multilocus sequence typing, and often Specific identification and Typing.

Xylem is a subfield of Botany that Blanca B. Landa tackles. As part of the same scientific family, Blanca B. Landa usually focuses on Botany, concentrating on Isolation and intersecting with DNA sequencing. Her research in Olive trees focuses on subjects like Genetic diversity, which are connected to Biological dispersal, Evolutionary biology, Balearic islands and Ecology.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Sex Differences in the Gut Microbiota as Potential Determinants of Gender Predisposition to Disease. (30 citations)
  • Emergence of a Plant Pathogen in Europe Associated with Multiple Intercontinental Introductions. (17 citations)
  • Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Characterization of the Olive Xylem Microbiota: Effect of Sap Extraction Methods. (13 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Subspecies, Xylella fastidiosa, Olive trees, Leaf scorch and Outbreak. Blanca B. Landa has included themes like Biological dispersal, Multilocus sequence typing and Genetic diversity in her Subspecies study. Her studies deal with areas such as Aroma and Verticillium wilt as well as Olive trees.

Her research in Leaf scorch intersects with topics in Phylogenetics, Genome, Sequence analysis and Phylogenetic tree. Blanca B. Landa focuses mostly in the field of Outbreak, narrowing it down to topics relating to Phylogenetic inference and, in certain cases, Botany. Her Botany study combines topics in areas such as Microbiological culture, Methylobacterium, 16S ribosomal RNA, Bacteria and Isolation.

Best Publications

  • Intestinal Microbiota Is Influenced by Gender and Body Mass Index.

    Carmen Haro;Carmen Haro;Oriol A. Rangel-Zúñiga;Oriol A. Rangel-Zúñiga;Juan F. Alcalá-Díaz;Juan F. Alcalá-Díaz;Francisco Gómez-Delgado;Francisco Gómez-Delgado

  • Effects of Commercial and Indigenous Microorganisms on Fusarium Wilt Development in Chickpea1

    A. Hervás;B. Landa;L.E. Datnoff;R.M. Jiménez-Dı́az

  • Influence of chickpea genotype and Bacillus sp. on protection from Fusarium wilt by seed treatment with nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum

    Ana Harvás;Blanca Landa;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz

  • Role of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in the defense of plant roots.

    D. M. Weller;B. B. Landa;O. V. Mavrodi;K. L. Schroeder

  • Previsual symptoms of Xylella fastidiosa infection revealed in spectral plant-trait alterations.

    P. J. Zarco-Tejada;C. Camino;P. S. A. Beck;R. Calderon

  • Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis.

    Silvia Winter;Thomas Bauer;Peter Strauss;Sophie Kratschmer

  • Two Healthy Diets Modulate Gut Microbial Community Improving Insulin Sensitivity in a Human Obese Population.

    Carmen Haro;Carmen Haro;Miguel Montes-Borrego;Oriol A. Rangel-Zúñiga;Oriol A. Rangel-Zúñiga;Juan F. Alcalá-Díaz;Juan F. Alcalá-Díaz

  • The gut microbial community in metabolic syndrome patients is modified by diet

    Carmen Haro;Carmen Haro;Sonia Garcia-Carpintero;Sonia Garcia-Carpintero;Juan F. Alcala-Diaz;Juan F. Alcala-Diaz;Francisco Gomez-Delgado;Francisco Gomez-Delgado

  • Influence of gender and menopausal status on gut microbiota.

    Jose A. Santos-Marcos;Oriol A. Rangel-Zuñiga;Rosa Jimenez-Lucena;Gracia M. Quintana-Navarro

  • Plant genotype-specific archaeal and bacterial endophytes but similar Bacillus antagonists colonize Mediterranean olive trees

    Henry Müller;Christian Berg;Blanca B. Landa;Anna Auerbach

  • Fusarium wilt of chickpeas: Biology, ecology and management

    Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz;Pablo Castillo;María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco;Blanca B. Landa

  • Differential Ability of Genotypes of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Producing Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains To Colonize the Roots of Pea Plants

    Blanca B. Landa;Olga V. Mavrodi;Jos M. Raaijmakers;Brian B. McSpadden Gardener

  • Integrated management of fusarium wilt of chickpea with sowing date, host resistance, and biological control.

    Blanca B. Landa;Juan A. Navas-Cortés;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz

  • Endophytic colonisation of opium poppy, Papaver somniferum, by an entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana strain

    E Quesada-Moraga;B B Landa;J Muñoz-Ledesma;R M Jiménez-Diáz

  • Influence of Temperature and Inoculum Density of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on Suppression of Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea by Rhizosphere Bacteria.

    Blanca B. Landa;Juan A. Navas-Cortés;Ana Hervás;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz

  • Sex Differences in the Gut Microbiota as Potential Determinants of Gender Predisposition to Disease.

    Jose A. Santos‐Marcos;Jose A. Santos‐Marcos;Carmen Haro;Carmen Haro;Ana Vega‐Rojas;Ana Vega‐Rojas;Juan F. Alcala‐Diaz;Juan F. Alcala‐Diaz

  • Consumption of Two Healthy Dietary Patterns Restored Microbiota Dysbiosis in Obese Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction

    Carmen Haro;Carmen Haro;Sonia García‐Carpintero;Sonia García‐Carpintero;Oriol A. Rangel‐Zúñiga;Juan F. Alcalá‐Díaz

  • Interactions Between Strains of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Producing Pseudomonas fluorescens in the Rhizosphere of Wheat.

    Blanca B. Landa;Dmitri M. Mavrodi;Linda S. Thomashow;David M. Weller

  • Microbial communities associated with the root system of wild olives ( Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris ) are good reservoirs of bacteria with antagonistic potential against Verticillium dahliae

    Sergio Aranda;Miguel Montes-Borrego;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz;Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz;Blanca B. Landa

  • The Hidden Habit of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana: First Demonstration of Vertical Plant Transmission

    Enrique Quesada-Moraga;Cristina López-Díaz;Blanca Beatriz Landa

  • Pathogenicity of the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on potato

    Nicola Vovlas;D. Mifsud;Blanca B. Landa;Pablo Castillo

  • Influence of temperature on plant–rhizobacteria interactions related to biocontrol potential for suppression of fusarium wilt of chickpea

    B. B. Landa;J. A. Navas-Cortés;R. M. Jiménez-Díaz;R. M. Jiménez-Díaz

  • Spatiotemporal analysis of spread of infections by Verticillium dahliae pathotypes within a high tree density olive orchard in southern Spain.

    J. A. Navas-Cortés;B. B. Landa;J. Mercado-Blanco;J. L. Trapero-Casas

  • Ditylenchus gigas n. sp. parasitizing broad bean: a new stem nematode singled out from the Ditylenchus dipsaci species complex using a polyphasic approach with molecular phylogeny

    N. Vovlas;A. Troccoli;J. E. Palomares-Rius;F. De Luca

  • In-planta detection and monitorization of endophytic colonization by a Beauveria bassiana strain using a new-developed nested and quantitative PCR-based assay and confocal laser scanning microscopy.

    B.B. Landa;C. López-Díaz;D. Jiménez-Fernández;M. Montes-Borrego

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz
Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz University of Córdoba
Juan A. Navas-Cortés
Juan A. Navas-Cortés Spanish National Research Council
Jose Lopez-Miranda
Jose Lopez-Miranda Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Francisco Perez-Jimenez
Francisco Perez-Jimenez Instituto de Salud Carlos III
José A. Gómez
José A. Gómez Spanish National Research Council
María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco
María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco Pennsylvania State University
Sergei A. Subbotin
Sergei A. Subbotin California Department of Food and Agriculture
Johann G. Zaller
Johann G. Zaller BOKU University
David M. Weller
David M. Weller United States Department of Agriculture
João Roberto Spotti Lopes
João Roberto Spotti Lopes Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Blanca B. Landa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles