World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ayman El Sabagh

Ayman El Sabagh

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 38 4444 4165 11 11 184 4987

Ayman El Sabagh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ayman El Sabagh between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ayman El Sabagh published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 25.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 73 publications in 2022. 92 of the 383 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 73. Peak 73 publications in 2022. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 70 publications 2022: 73 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 49 publications
2011 2025

383 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ayman El Sabagh: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 5
2016 19
2017 14
2018 11
2019 15
2020 32
2021 70
2022 73
2023 51
2024 43
2025 49
Total 383
Download as CSV

Ayman El Sabagh publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ayman El Sabagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–185 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 184 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98 184
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Ayman El Sabagh D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ayman El Sabagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247 38
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Consequences and Mitigation Strategies of Abiotic Stresses in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the Changing Climate

    Akbar Hossain;Milan Skalicky;Marian Brestic;Sagar Maitra

  • Copper-induced oxidative stress, initiation of antioxidants and phytoremediation potential of flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) seedlings grown under the mixing of two different soils of China

    Muhammad Hamzah Saleem;Shah Fahad;Shahid Ullah Khan;Mairaj Din

  • Evaluation of Drought Tolerance of Some Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes through Phenology, Growth, and Physiological Indices

    M. Kaium Chowdhury;M. A. Hasan;M. M. Bahadur;Md. Rafiqul Islam

  • Evaluation of Fourteen Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes by Observing Gas Exchange Parameters, Relative Water and Chlorophyll Content, and Yield Attributes under Drought Stress

    Allah Wasaya;Sobia Manzoor;Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir;Naeem Sarwar

  • Consequences of Salinity Stress on the Quality of Crops and Its Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Crop Production: An Outlook of Arid and Semi-arid Regions

    Ayman El Sabagh;Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Celaleddin Barutçular;Muhammad Aamir Iqbal

  • Maize/soybean strip intercropping produces higher crop yields and saves water under semi-arid conditions

    Unknown

  • Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Chlorophyll Content for Precision Nitrogen Management in Durum Wheat Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions

    Ferhat Kızılgeçi;Mehmet Yıldırım;Mohammad Sohidul Islam;Disna Ratnasekera

  • EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS ON THE QUALITY OF MAJOR OILSEED CROPS: IMPLICATIONS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES - A REVIEW

    A El Sabagh;A Hossain;C Barutçular;O Gormus

  • Selenium Alleviates the Adverse Effect of Drought in Oilseed Crops Camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and Canola (Brassica napus L.)

    Zahoor Ahmad;Zahoor Ahmad;Shazia Anjum;Milan Skalicky;Ejaz Ahmad Waraich

  • CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: Insights into Technological Breakthroughs and Future Challenges.

    Muntazir Mushtaq;Aejaz Ahmad Dar;Milan Skalicky;Anshika Tyagi

  • Fractionation of Heavy Metals in Multi-Contaminated Soil Treated with Biochar Using the Sequential Extraction Procedure.

    Mahrous Awad;Mahrous Awad;Zhongzhen Liu;Milan Skalicky;Eldessoky S Dessoky

  • Pre-sowing seed treatment with kinetin and calcium mitigates salt induced inhibition of seed germination and seedling growth of choysum (Brassica rapa var. parachinensis).

    Muhammad Kamran;Dan Wang;Kaizhi Xie;Yusheng Lu

  • Comparative studies on growth and physiological responses to saline and alkaline stresses of Foxtail millet ('Setaria italica' L.) and Proso millet ('Panicum miliaceum' L.)

    Mohammad Sohidul Islam;Mosammad Masuma Akhter;Ayman El Sabagh;Li Yun Liu

  • Exogenous Sodium Nitroprusside Mitigates Salt Stress in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) by Affecting the Growth, Yield, and Biochemical Properties.

    Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir;Ayesha Khan;Milan Skalicky;Allah Wasaya

  • Exogenous aspartic acid alleviates salt stress-induced decline in growth by enhancing antioxidants and compatible solutes while reducing reactive oxygen species in wheat

    Unknown

  • Potential Effects of Biochar Application for Improving Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Growth and Soil Biochemical Properties under Drought Stress Conditions

    Muhammad Saqlain Zaheer;Hafiz Haider Ali;Walid Soufan;Rashid Iqbal

  • Foliar application of silicon-based nanoparticles improve the adaptability of maize (Zea mays L.) in cadmium contaminated soils

    Unknown

  • Lipoic Acid Combined with Melatonin Mitigates Oxidative Stress and Promotes Root Formation and Growth in Salt-Stressed Canola Seedlings (Brassica napus L.).

    Hafiz Muhammad Rashad Javeed;Mazhar Ali;Milan Skalicky;Fahim Nawaz

  • Drought and salinity stress management for higher and sustainable canola (Brassica napus L.) production: a critical review.

    Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Celaleddin Barutcular;Mohammad Sohidul Islam

  • Impact of mineral fertilizers on mineral nutrients in the ginger rhizome and on soil enzymes activities and soil properties.

    D. Jabborova;R.Z. Sayyed;A. Azimov;Z. Jabbarov

  • Supplementing Nitrogen in Combination with Rhizobium Inoculation and Soil Mulch in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Production System: Part II. Effect on Phenology, Growth, Yield Attributes, Pod Quality, Profitability and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

    Mousumi Mondal;Milan Skalicky;Sourav Garai;Akbar Hossain

  • Drought and salinity stresses in barley: Consequences and mitigation strategies

    Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Mohammad Sohidul Islam;Celaleddin Barutçular

  • Biofertilizer-Based Zinc Application Enhances Maize Growth, Gas Exchange Attributes, and Yield in Zinc-Deficient Soil

    Abdul Saboor;Muhammad Arif Ali;Niaz Ahmed;Milan Skalicky

  • Sustainable maize (Zea mays L.) production under drought stress by understanding its adverse effect, survival mechanism and drought tolerance indices.

    Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Celaleddin Barutçular

  • Organic Amendments Boost Soil Fertility and Rice Productivity and Reduce Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields under Sub-Tropical Conditions

    Mahamudul Haque;Juel Datta;Tareq Ahmed;Ehsanullah

  • Legumes under Drought Stress: Plant Responses, Adaptive Mechanisms, and Management Strategies in Relation to Nitrogen Fixation

    Mohammad Sohidul Islam;Shah Fahad;Akbar Hossain;M Kaium Chowdhury

  • Sustainable soybean production and abiotic stress management in saline environments: a critical review.

    Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Mohammad Shohidul Islam;Celaleddin Barutcular

  • Interactive Effect of Weeding Regimes, Rice Cultivars, and Seeding Rates Influence the Rice-Weed Competition under Dry Direct-Seeded Condition

    Sharif Ahmed;M. Jahangir Alam;Akbar Hossain;A. K. M. Mominul Islam

  • Salinity Stress in Maize: Effects of Stress and Recent Developments of Tolerance for Improvement

    Ayman El Sabagh;Fatih Çiğ;Seyithan Seydoşoğlu;Martin Leonardo Battaglia

  • Influence of nitrogen application on dry biomass allocation and translocation in two maize varieties under short pre-anthesis and prolonged bracketing flowering periods of drought

    Md. Samim Hossain Molla;Sutkhet Nakasathien;Md. Akkas Ali;Asmmr Khan

  • Yield Response, Nutritional Quality and Water Productivity of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are Influenced by Drip Irrigation and Straw Mulch in the Coastal Saline Ecosystem of Ganges Delta, India

    Indranil Samui;Milan Skalicky;Sukamal Sarkar;Koushik Brahmachari

  • Drought and Heat Stress in Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.): Consequences and Their Possible Mitigation Strategies

    Ayman El Sabagh;Akbar Hossain;Md. Sohidul Islam;Celaleddin Barutcular

  • Effect of naphthaleneacetic acid on root and plant growth and yield of ten irrigated wheat genotypes

    M.A.H.S Jahan;Akbar Hossain;Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva;Ayman El Sabagh

  • Evaluation of maize hybrids to terminal drought stress tolerance by defining drought indices

    Celaleddin Barutcular;Ayman El Sabagh;Omer Konuskan;Hirofumi Saneoka

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) SEED OIL AND FATTY ACIDS COMPOSITION UNDER DIFFERENT GROWING SEASON UNDER

    Leyla Gulluoglu;Halil Bakal;Bihter Onat;Ayman El Sabagh

Frequent Co-Authors

Marian Brestic
Marian Brestic Slovak University of Agriculture
Milan Skalicky
Milan Skalicky Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Subhan Danish
Subhan Danish Bahauddin Zakariya University
Ram Swaroop Meena
Ram Swaroop Meena Banaras Hindu University
Muhammad Farooq
Muhammad Farooq Sultan Qaboos University
Talha Javed
Talha Javed Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
Hesham F. Alharby
Hesham F. Alharby King Abdulaziz University
Ejaz Ahmad Waraich
Ejaz Ahmad Waraich University of Agriculture Faisalabad
Mirza Hasanuzzaman
Mirza Hasanuzzaman Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
Akihiro Ueda
Akihiro Ueda Hiroshima University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ayman El Sabagh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles