World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
19835
World Ranking
11720
National Ranking
5038

Richard J. Wenstrup publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Wenstrup sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard J. Wenstrup D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Wenstrup sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Wenstrup is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and molecular aspects related to cancer, especially prostate cancer treatment and research.

The main fields of study in Wenstrup's published work include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these areas, subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Molecular Biology are notable.

Wenstrup's research covers several key topics, including:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Frequent co-authors in Wenstrup's publications are:

  • Joseph D. Schonhoft
  • Andrew J. Armstrong
  • David M. Nanus
  • Russell Z. Szmulewitz
  • Daniel C. Danila

Research output by Wenstrup has appeared repeatedly in specific scientific venues, including:

  • Annals of Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • JCO Precision Oncology
  • European Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Wenstrup include:

  • Prospective Multicenter Study of Circulating Tumor Cell AR-V7 and Taxane Versus Hormonal Treatment Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, 2020, JCO Precision Oncology
  • Circulating Tumor Cell Chromosomal Instability and Neuroendocrine Phenotype by Immunomorphology and Poor Outcomes in Men with mCRPC Treated with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide, 2021, Clinical Cancer Research
  • PSMA-positive Circulating Tumor Cell Detection and Outcomes with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide Treatment in Men with Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer, 2023, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Analysis of BRCA2 Copy Number Loss and Genomic Instability in Circulating Tumor Cells from Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer, 2022, European Urology
  • Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and PSMA PET correlates in the phase I PRINCE trial of 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus pembrolizumab for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Ehlers‐Danlos syndromes: Revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997

    Peter Beighton;Anne De Paepe;Beat Steinmann;Petros Tsipouras

  • Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine MC3T3‐E1 cells in culture: An in vitro model of osteoblast development

    L D Quarles;D A Yohay;L W Lever;R Caton

  • Type V Collagen Controls the Initiation of Collagen Fibril Assembly

    Richard J. Wenstrup;Jane B. Florer;Eric W. Brunskill;Sheila M. Bell

  • Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next‐generation sequencing with a 25‐gene panel

    Nadine Tung;Chiara Battelli;Brian Allen;Rajesh Kaldate

  • Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer

    Nadine Tung;Nancy U. Lin;John Kidd;Brian A. Allen

  • A Systematic Genetic Assessment of 1,433 Sequence Variants of Unknown Clinical Significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast Cancer–Predisposition Genes

    Douglas F. Easton;Amie M. Deffenbaugh;Dmitry Pruss;Cynthia Frye

  • Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

    Matthew B. Yurgelun;Matthew H. Kulke;Charles S. Fuchs;Brian A. Allen

  • Defective pro alpha 2(I) collagen synthesis in a recessive mutation in mice: a model of human osteogenesis imperfecta.

    Stewart D. Chipman;Hope O. Sweet;Daniel J. McBride;Muriel T. Davisson

  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer.

    Michael J. Hall;Julia E. Reid;Lynn A. Burbidge;Dmitry Pruss

  • Patients Tested at a Laboratory for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Show an Overlap for Multiple Syndromes in Their Personal and Familial Cancer Histories

    Jennifer Saam;Christopher Arnell;Aaron Theisen;Kelsey Moyes

  • Identification of a Variety of Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Patients With Suspected Lynch Syndrome

    Matthew B. Yurgelun;Matthew B. Yurgelun;Brian Allen;Rajesh R. Kaldate;Karla R. Bowles

  • Clinical and genetic aspects of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type

    Fransiska Malfait;Richard J Wenstrup;Anne De Paepe

  • Mesenchymal stem cells used for rabbit tendon repair can form ectopic bone and express alkaline phosphatase activity in constructs.

    M. T. Harris;D. L. Butler;G. P. Boivin;J. B. Florer

  • BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CDKN2A mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A PACGENE study

    David B. Zhen;Kari G. Rabe;Steven Gallinger;Sapna Syngal

  • Prevalence and phenotypes of APC and MUTYH mutations in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas.

    Shilpa Grover;Fay Kastrinos;Ewout W. Steyerberg;E. Francis Cook

  • Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple-negative breast cancer.

    Anne Renee Hartman;Rajesh R. Kaldate;Lisa M. Sailer;Lisa Painter

  • Isolation of a Novel Latent Transforming Growth Factor-β Binding Protein Gene (LTBP-3) (∗)

    Wushan Yin;Elizabeth Smiley;John Germiller;Robert P. Mecham

  • The PREMM1,2,6 Model Predicts Risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Germline Mutations Based on Cancer History

    Fay Kastrinos;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Rowena Mercado;Judith Balmaña

  • Collagen V is a dominant regulator of collagen fibrillogenesis: dysfunctional regulation of structure and function in a corneal-stroma-specific Col5a1-null mouse model.

    Mei Sun;Shoujun Chen;Sheila M. Adams;Jane B. Florer

  • Effect of Enzyme Replacement Therapy With Imiglucerase on BMD in Type 1 Gaucher Disease

    Richard J Wenstrup;Katherine A Kacena;Paige Kaplan;Gregory M Pastores

Frequent Co-Authors

Sapna Syngal
Sapna Syngal Harvard Medical School
Anne De Paepe
Anne De Paepe Ghent University Hospital
David E. Birk
David E. Birk University of South Florida
William G. Cole
William G. Cole University of Toronto
Peter H. Byers
Peter H. Byers University of Washington
Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Nadine Tung
Nadine Tung Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Daniel H. Cohn
Daniel H. Cohn University of California, Los Angeles
Elise Héon
Elise Héon University of Toronto
James M. Ford
James M. Ford Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to diverse career trajectories, many of which now offer flexible online advanced degrees. For those considering leadership roles in healthcare, an doctorate in healthcare administration online equips graduates with the management and policy expertise needed in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Students seeking a clinical focus might consider online dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline the pathway to advanced nursing roles without traditional research barriers. Meanwhile, those interested in pharmaceuticals can prepare through pharm d online programs, offering the credentials required for pharmacist positions and specialized practice.

If your interest bridges human biology and fitness, consider pursuing fitness degrees online. These programs pave the way for careers in exercise science, coaching, rehabilitation, and wellness entrepreneurship. With online options expanding, more students can tailor their education to their career goals in the biosciences and healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Wenstrup

Trending Scientists