World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Antonio Ballester publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Ballester sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Antonio Ballester D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Ballester sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Ecology

His main research concerns Botany, Shoot, Explant culture, Quercus robur and Somatic embryogenesis. His Botany study incorporates themes from Sucrose, Auxin and Tissue culture. In his work, Hybrid and Root rot is strongly intertwined with Plantlet, which is a subfield of Shoot.

Antonio Ballester is interested in Micropropagation, which is a branch of Explant culture. While the research belongs to areas of Quercus robur, Antonio Ballester spends his time largely on the problem of Epicormic shoot, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Cytokinin, Subculture and Fagaceae. His Somatic embryogenesis study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Somaclonal variation, Germination and Callus.

His most cited work include:

  • Bioremediation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by bacterial nitroreductase expressing transgenic aspen. (110 citations)
  • Proliferation, maturation and germination of Castanea sativa Mill. Somatic embryos originated from leaf explants. (75 citations)
  • Anatomical and chemical studies of vitrified shoots of chestnut regenerated in vitro (74 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, Somatic embryogenesis, Shoot, Explant culture and Horticulture. Antonio Ballester combines subjects such as Micropropagation and Tissue culture with his study of Botany. His studies in Somatic embryogenesis integrate themes in fields like Vegetative reproduction, Cryopreservation and Somatic cell.

Antonio Ballester interconnects In vitro, Juvenile, Basal shoot, Auxin and Quercus robur in the investigation of issues within Shoot. His Explant culture research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Epicormic shoot, Zeatin, Cytokinin and Apex. The various areas that Antonio Ballester examines in his Horticulture study include Woody plant, Crop and Sucrose.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (74.23%)
  • Somatic embryogenesis (45.36%)
  • Shoot (40.21%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2019)?

  • Somatic embryogenesis (45.36%)
  • Botany (74.23%)
  • Explant culture (32.99%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Antonio Ballester spends much of his time researching Somatic embryogenesis, Botany, Explant culture, Shoot and Vegetative reproduction. In his research on the topic of Somatic embryogenesis, Transformation efficiency and Plant disease resistance is strongly related with Genetically modified crops. He mostly deals with Germination in his studies of Botany.

His Explant culture research focuses on subjects like Auxin, which are linked to Picloram and Embryo. His Shoot research includes elements of Hypocotyl and Murashige and Skoog medium, Thidiazuron. His work is dedicated to discovering how Horticulture, Woody plant are connected with Eucalyptus and Sucrose and other disciplines.

Between 2013 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Induction of somatic embryogenesis in explants of shoot cultures established from adult Eucalyptus globulus and E. saligna × E. maidenii trees (41 citations)
  • Effect of thidiazuron on multiple shoot induction and plant regeneration from cotyledonary nodes of chestnut (29 citations)
  • Micropropagation of mature Quercus ilex L. trees by axillary budding (18 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Ecology

Antonio Ballester mainly focuses on Botany, Explant culture, Shoot, Murashige and Skoog medium and Somatic embryogenesis. As part of his studies on Botany, Antonio Ballester often connects relevant subjects like Thidiazuron. Many of his studies on Explant culture apply to Epicotyl as well.

His studies deal with areas such as Micropropagation, Picloram, Zeatin and Budding as well as Murashige and Skoog medium. His research integrates issues of Subculture, Callus, Molecular biology, Genetically modified crops and Auxin in his study of Somatic embryogenesis.

Best Publications

  • Anatomical and Biochemical Events during in vitro Rooting of Microcuttings from Juvenile and Mature Phases of Chestnut

    A. Ballester;M.C. San-José;N. Vidal;J.L. Fernández-Lorenzo

  • Bioremediation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by bacterial nitroreductase expressing transgenic aspen.

    Pieter Van Dillewijn;José L Couselo;Elena Corredoira;Antonio Delgado

  • Proliferation, maturation and germination of Castanea sativa Mill. Somatic embryos originated from leaf explants.

    E. Corredoira;A. Ballester;A. M. Vieitez

  • Somatic embryogenesis from stem and leaf explants of Quercus robur L.

    B. Cuenca;M. C. San-José;M. T. Martínez;A. Ballester

  • Anatomical and chemical studies of vitrified shoots of chestnut regenerated in vitro

    A. M. Vieitez;A. Ballester;M. C. San‐José;E. Vieitez

  • Requirements for in vitro rooting of Quercus robur and Q. rubra shoots derived from mature trees.

    M. C. Sanchez;M. C. San-Jose;A. Ballester;A. M. Vieitez

  • Induction of somatic embryogenesis in explants of shoot cultures established from adult Eucalyptus globulus and E. saligna × E. maidenii trees

    E. Corredoira;A. Ballester;M. Ibarra;A.M. Vieitez

  • Foreed flushing of branch segments as a method for obtaining reactive explants of mature Quercus robur trees for micropropagation

    Ana M. Vieitez;M. Concepclón Sánchez;Juan B. Amo-Marco;Antonio Ballester

  • Cold storage of shoot cultures and alginate encapsulation of shoot tips of Camellia japonica L. and Camellia reticulata Lindley

    A. Ballester;L.V. Janeiro;A.M. Vieitez

  • Developmental stages during the rooting of in-vitro-cultured Quercus robur shoots from material of juvenile and mature origin.

    N. Vidal;G. Arellano;M. C. San-José;A. M. Vieitez

  • Thidiazuron-induced high-frequency plant regeneration from leaf explants of Paulownia tomentosa mature trees

    E. Corredoira;A. Ballester;A. M. Vieitez

  • Cryopreservation of embryogenic cultures of Quercus robur using desiccation and vitrification procedures

    M.T. Martı́nez;A. Ballester;A.M. Vieitez

  • Application of biotechnological tools to Quercus improvement

    Ana M. Vieitez;Elena Corredoira;M. Teresa Martínez;M. Carmen San-José

  • Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from tissues of mature oak trees: true-to-type conformity of plantlets by RAPD analysis.

    S. Valladares;C. Sánchez;M. T. Martínez;A. Ballester

  • In vitro regeneration of the important North American oak species Quercus alba, Quercus bicolor and Quercus rubra

    A. M. Vieitez;E. Corredoira;A. Ballester;F. Muñoz

  • In vitro plantlet regeneration of mature chestnut

    A.M. Vieitez;A. Ballester;M.L. Vieitez;E. Vieitez

  • Non-Zygotic Embryogenesis in Hardwood Species

    E. Corredoira;S. A. Merkle;M. T. Martínez;M. Toribio

  • Improving micropropagation conditions for adult-phase shoots of chestnut

    M. Concepcion Sanchez;M. Carmen San-Jose;E. Ferro;A. Ballester

  • Factors affecting in vitro propagation of Quercus robur L.

    M. C. San-José;A. Ballester;A. M. Vieitez

  • In vitro response of encapsulated somatic embryos of camellia

    Laura V. Janeiro;Antonio Ballester;Ana M. Vieitez

Frequent Co-Authors

A. M. Vieitez
A. M. Vieitez Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Ballester

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles