World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
2942
World Ranking
9497
National Ranking
142

Anna Kontu publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Kontu sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anna Kontu D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Kontu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Kontu is a researcher affiliated with the Finnish Meteorological Institute in Finland. Their scientific work primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with a notable emphasis on Atmospheric Science and Environmental Engineering.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Ecology

In terms of topical areas, their investigations cover:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Anna Kontu has published extensively, with frequent appearances in the following journals and venues:

  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Cryosphere
  • Frontiers in Earth Science

Some of their recent scientific articles include:

  • Investigation of Environmental Effects on Coherence Loss in SAR Interferometry for Snow Water Equivalent Retrieval, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Temperature effects on L-band vegetation optical depth of a boreal forest, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • X-Ray Tomography-Based Microstructure Representation in the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer Model, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Effect of small-scale snow surface roughness on snow albedo and reflectance, 2021, The Cryosphere
  • Modeling the evolution of the structural anisotropy of snow, 2020, The Cryosphere

The researcher collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Juha Lemmetyinen
  • Jouni Pulliainen
  • Kimmo Rautiainen
  • Juval Cohen
  • Jorge Jorge Ruiz

Best Publications

  • ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

    Gerhard Krinner;Chris Derksen;Richard Essery;Mark Flanner

  • Detection of soil freezing from L-band passive microwave observations

    Kimmo Rautiainen;Juha Lemmetyinen;Mike Schwank;Anna Kontu

  • L-Band Radiometer Observations of Soil Processes in Boreal and Subarctic Environments

    K. Rautiainen;J. Lemmetyinen;J. Pulliainen;J. Vehvilainen

  • Multiple-Layer Adaptation of HUT Snow Emission Model: Comparison With Experimental Data

    Juha Lemmetyinen;Jouni Pulliainen;Andrew Rees;Anna Kontu

  • Snow density and ground permittivity retrieved from L-band radiometry: Application to experimental data

    Juha Lemmetyinen;Mike Schwank;Kimmo Rautiainen;Anna Kontu

  • Model for microwave emission of a snow-covered ground with focus on L band

    Mike Schwank;Kimmo Rautiainen;Christian Mätzler;Manfred Stähli

  • Meteorological and evaluation datasets for snow modelling at 10 reference sites: description of in situ and bias-corrected reanalysis data

    Cécile B. Ménard;Richard Essery;Alan Barr;Paul Bartlett

  • European In-Situ Snow Measurements: Practices and Purposes.

    Roberta Pirazzini;Leena Leppänen;Ghislain Picard;Juan Ignacio Lopez-Moreno

  • Spectral albedo of seasonal snow during intensive melt period at Sodankylä, beyond the Arctic Circle

    O. Meinander;S. Kazadzis;A. Arola;A. Riihelä

  • Retrieval of Effective Correlation Length and Snow Water Equivalent from Radar and Passive Microwave Measurements

    Juha Lemmetyinen;Chris Derksen;Helmut Rott;Giovanni Macelloni

  • Simulation of Spaceborne Microwave Radiometer Measurements of Snow Cover Using In Situ Data and Brightness Temperature Modeling

    A. Kontu;J. Pulliainen

  • Nordic Snow Radar Experiment

    Juha Lemmetyinen;Anna Kontu;Jouni Pulliainen;Juho Vehviläinen

  • Sodankylä manual snow survey program

    Leena Leppänen;Anna Kontu;Henna-Reetta Hannula;Heidi Sjöblom

  • Evolution of snow and ice temperature, thickness and energy balance in Lake Orajärvi, northern Finland

    Bin Cheng;Timo Vihma;Laura Rontu;Anna Kontu

  • Investigation of Environmental Effects on Coherence Loss in SAR Interferometry for Snow Water Equivalent Retrieval

    Unknown

  • The behaviour of snow and snow-free surface reflectance in boreal forests: Implications to the performance of snow covered area monitoring

    Miia Salminen;Jouni Pulliainen;Sari Metsämäki;Anna Kontu

  • An assessment of two automated snow water equivalent instruments during the WMO Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment

    Craig D. Smith;Anna Kontu;Richard Laffin;John W. Pomeroy

  • SMOS Calibration Subsystem

    J. Lemmetyinen;J. Uusitalo;J. Kainulainen;K. Rautiainen

  • Simulating seasonally and spatially varying snow cover brightness temperature using HUT snow emission model and retrieval of a microwave effective grain size

    Juha Lemmetyinen;Chris Derksen;Peter Toose;Martin Proksch

  • On the estimation of temporal changes of snow water equivalent by spaceborne SAR interferometry: a new application for the Sentinel-1 mission

    Vasco Conde;Giovanni Nico;Pedro Mateus;João Catalão

  • Comparison of traditional and optical grain-size field measurements with SNOWPACK simulations in a taiga snowpack

    Leena I Leppänen;Anna Kontu;Juho Vehviläinen;Juha Lemmetyinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Juha Lemmetyinen
Juha Lemmetyinen Finnish Meteorological Institute
Jouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen Finnish Meteorological Institute
Andreas Wiesmann
Andreas Wiesmann University of Bern
Chris Derksen
Chris Derksen Environment and Climate Change Canada
Christian Mätzler
Christian Mätzler University of Bern
Aki Virkkula
Aki Virkkula Finnish Meteorological Institute
Richard Essery
Richard Essery University of Edinburgh
Helmut Rott
Helmut Rott University of Innsbruck
Martti Hallikainen
Martti Hallikainen Aalto University
Harri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen University of Turku

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career paths. Students might consider programs in easiest bachelor degree fields to complement their knowledge or start with a degree that balances workload and interest effectively.

Specializations like geology are highly relevant, as they provide insight into earth processes and natural resource management. Many institutions now offer online geology programs, which allow flexible learning while gaining essential skills for environmental consulting, conservation, or research roles.

Another crucial area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), indispensable for spatial data analysis in environmental studies. Pursuing best gis graduate programs online equips students with tools for mapping, modeling, and problem-solving across different environmental sectors.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and management, a public administration degree can be valuable. Top professionals often enhance their credentials through top online mpa programs, preparing for leadership roles in government and non-profit organizations focused on sustainability and regulation.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Kontu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles