World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Manuel Martin-Neira

Manuel Martin-Neira

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
7856
World Ranking
11486
National Ranking
284

Manuel Martin-Neira publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Martin-Neira sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Manuel Martin-Neira D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Martin-Neira sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manuel Martin-Neira is affiliated with the European Space Agency in France. Their research spans multiple fields and subfields, with significant contributions in Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Engineering. Specific areas of focus include Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Oceanography.

Their published work covers topics such as Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques, Precipitation Measurement and Analysis, Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology, Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, and Climate Change and Permafrost.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Remote sensing and its applications using GNSS reflected signals: advances and prospects, 2024, Satellite Navigation
  • Increasing stratification as observed by satellite sea surface salinity measurements, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Triple Collocation Analysis for Two Error-Correlated Datasets: Application to L-Band Brightness Temperatures over Land, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Design of optimal low-thrust manoeuvres for remote sensing multi-satellite formation flying in low Earth orbit, 2021, Advances in Space Research
  • The IEEE-SA Working Group on Spaceborne GNSS-R: Scene Study, 2021, IEEE Access

Frequent co-authors in Manuel Martin-Neira's research include:

  • Roger Oliva
  • I. Corbella
  • Verónica González-Gambau
  • Martin Süess
  • Volodymyr Kudriashov

Manuel Martin-Neira's work has been published repeatedly in notable venues such as:

  • Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Chinese Journal of Space Science
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium

Best Publications

  • The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle

    Yann H Kerr;Philippe Waldteufel;Jean-Pierre Wigneron;Steven Delwart

  • SMOS: The Challenging Sea Surface Salinity Measurement From Space

    Jordi Font;Adriano Camps;Andrés Borges;Manuel Martín-Neira

  • SMOS: The Payload

    K.D. McMullan;M.A. Brown;M. Martin-Neira;W. Rits

  • The PARIS concept: an experimental demonstration of sea surface altimetry using GPS reflected signals

    M. Martin-Neira;M. Caparrini;J. Font-Rossello;S. Lannelongue

  • ESA's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Mission: Mission Performance and Operations

    S. Mecklenburg;M. Drusch;Y. H. Kerr;J. Font

  • The WISE 2000 and 2001 field experiments in support of the SMOS mission: sea surface L-band brightness temperature observations and their application to sea surface salinity retrieval

    A. Camps;J. Font;M. Vall-llossera;C. Gabarro

  • First Spaceborne Phase Altimetry over Sea Ice Using TechDemoSat-1 GNSS-R Signals†

    Weiqiang Li;Estel Cardellach;Fran Fabra;Antonio Rius

  • Altimetric Analysis of the Sea-Surface GPS-Reflected Signals

    A. Rius;E. Cardellach;M. Martin-Neira

  • Consolidating the Precision of Interferometric GNSS-R Ocean Altimetry Using Airborne Experimental Data

    Estel Cardellach;Antonio Rius;Manuel Martin-Neira;Fran Fabra

  • The Eddy Experiment: Accurate GNSS‐R ocean altimetry from low altitude aircraft

    G. Ruffini;F. Soulat;M. Caparrini;O. Germain

  • GEROS-ISS: GNSS REflectometry, Radio Occultation, and Scatterometry Onboard the International Space Station

    Jens Wickert;Estel Cardellach;Manuel Martin-Neira;Jorge Bandeiras

  • MIRAS end-to-end calibration: application to SMOS L1 processor

    I. Corbella;F. Torres;A. Camps;A. Colliander

  • Sea surface state measured using GPS reflected signals

    Antonio Rius;Josep M. Aparicio;Estel Cardellach;Manuel Martín-Neira

  • Polarimetric mode of MIRAS

    M. Martin-Neira;S. Ribo;A.J. Martin-Polegre

  • ESA's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity mission: from science to operational applications.

    S Mecklenburg;M Drusch;L Kaleschke;N Rodriguez-Fernandez

  • Altimetry with GNSS-R interferometry: first proof of concept experiment

    Antonio Rius;Oleguer Nogués-Correig;Serni Ribó;Estel Cardellach

  • The Flat Target Transformation

    M. Martin-Neira;M. Suess;J. Kainulainen;F. Martin-Porqueras

  • MIRAS Calibration and Performance: Results From the SMOS In-Orbit Commissioning Phase

    I. Corbella;F. Torres;N. Duffo;V. González-Gambau

  • Microwave interferometric radiometry in remote sensing: An invited historical review

    M. Martin-Neira;D. M. LeVine;Y. Kerr;Niels Skou

  • SMOS Validation and the COSMOS Campaigns

    S. Delwart;C. Bouzinac;P. Wursteisen;M. Berger

  • L‐band sea surface emissivity: Preliminary results of the WISE‐2000 campaign and its application to salinity retrieval in the SMOS mission

    A. Camps;I. Corbella;M. Vall-llossera;N. Duffo

  • MIRAS, a two-dimensional aperture synthesis radiometer

    M. Martin-Neira;Y. Menard;J.M. Goutoule;U. Kraft

  • Revisiting the GNSS-R Waveform Statistics and Its Impact on Altimetric Retrievals

    Weiqiang Li;Antonio Rius;Fran Fabra;Estel Cardellach

Frequent Co-Authors

Adriano Camps
Adriano Camps Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Antonio Rius
Antonio Rius Spanish National Research Council
Jordi Font
Jordi Font Spanish National Research Council
Heino Falcke
Heino Falcke Radboud University
Yann Kerr
Yann Kerr Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Andreas Colliander
Andreas Colliander California Institute of Technology
Remo P. J. Tilanus
Remo P. J. Tilanus University of Arizona
Ole Baltazar Andersen
Ole Baltazar Andersen Technical University of Denmark
Nicolas Reul
Nicolas Reul French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Matthias Drusch
Matthias Drusch European Space Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education online opens many possibilities for students at different academic stages. Many choose an online associate's degree as an accessible starting point, providing foundational skills that can lead to a variety of tech roles or further study.

Those interested in further specialization may consider programs ranked among the best masters degree to get. Advanced degrees in computer science can lead to higher earning potential and in-demand roles in the technology sector.

Cost and academic history often influence enrollment decisions. For students looking to minimize expenses, many schools now offer cheap online college classes that still deliver high-quality education.

If you’re worried about your GPA, don’t be discouraged. There are options available, including finding a college with low gpa admission requirements, offering more flexible pathways to a computer science career.

Best Scientists Citing Manuel Martin-Neira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles