World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalie Castellanos-Ryan

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9918 9284 688 645 91 4679

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natalie Castellanos-Ryan between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natalie Castellanos-Ryan published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 24 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications
2010 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natalie Castellanos-Ryan: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 6
2012 2
2013 12
2014 4
2015 2
2016 5
2017 6
2018 4
2019 6
2020 8
2021 15
2022 7
2023 7
2024 9
2025 15
Total 110
Download as CSV

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Castellanos-Ryan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 91
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Castellanos-Ryan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their research spans psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology. Their work addresses multiple subfields including general health professions, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and epidemiology.

The primary topics of Natalie Castellanos-Ryan's research include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, homelessness and social issues, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, cannabis and cannabinoid research, suicide and self-harm studies, COVID-19 and mental health, and prenatal substance exposure effects.

Frequent collaborators include Jean R. Séguin, Sophie Parent, Richard E. Tremblay, Sylvana M. Côté, and Michel Boivin.

Natalie Castellanos-Ryan often publishes in several key venues such as JAMA Network Open, Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, and Addictive Behaviors.

Some notable recent papers authored by or involving Natalie Castellanos-Ryan include:

  • The 7-Year Effectiveness of School-Based Alcohol Use Prevention From Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Universal, Selective, and Combined Interventions (2021, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry)
  • Substance use disorders and suicidality in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on the direction of the association (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • A genetically informed study on the association of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco smoking with suicide attempt (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Depression and anxiety symptoms in young adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a Canadian population-based cohort (2021, Annals of General Psychiatry)
  • Cannabis use, depression and suicidal ideation in adolescence: direction of associations in a population based cohort (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of a selective, personality-targeted prevention program for adolescent alcohol use and misuse: a cluster randomized controlled trial

    Patricia J Conrod;Maeve O'Leary-Barrett;Nicola Newton;Lauren Topper

  • Brief, Personality-Targeted Coping Skills Interventions and Survival as a Non-Drug User Over a 2-Year Period During Adolescence

    Patricia J. Conrod;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;John Strang

  • Long-term effects of a personality-targeted intervention to reduce alcohol use in adolescents.

    Patricia J. Conrod;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Clare Mackie

  • The structure of psychopathology in adolescence and its common personality and cognitive correlates.

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Frédéric N. Brière;Maeve O'Leary-Barrett;Tobias Banaschewski

  • Developmental trajectories of psychotic-like experiences across adolescence: impact of victimization and substance use.

    C. J. Mackie;N. Castellanos-Ryan;P. J. Conrod

  • Response Inhibition and Reward Response Bias Mediate the Predictive Relationships Between Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking and Common and Unique Variance in Conduct Disorder and Substance Misuse

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Katya Rubia;Patricia J. Conrod

  • Neural and cognitive correlates of the common and specific variance across externalizing problems in young adolescence.

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Maren Struve;Robert Whelan;Tobias Banaschewski

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of a Brief Personality Screening Instrument in Predicting Future Substance Use, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems: 18-Month Predictive Validity of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Maeve O'Leary-Barrett;Laura Sully;Patricia Conrod;Patricia Conrod

  • Adolescent bullying victimisation and alcohol-related problem behaviour mediated by coping drinking motives over a 12 month period.

    Lauren R. Topper;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Clare Mackie;Patricia J. Conrod

  • Moderators of the association between peer and target adolescent substance use.

    Shawn Marschall-Lévesque;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Frank Vitaro;Jean R. Séguin

  • Adolescent cannabis use, change in neurocognitive function, and high-school graduation: A longitudinal study from early adolescence to young adulthood.

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro

  • Personality-targeted interventions delay uptake of drinking and decrease risk of alcohol-related problems when delivered by teachers.

    Maeve O'Leary-Barrett;Clare J. Mackie;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Nadia Al-Khudhairy

  • Pubertal development, personality, and substance use: a 10-year longitudinal study from childhood to adolescence.

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro;Richard E. Tremblay

  • Personality and Substance Misuse: Evidence for a Four-Factor Model of Vulnerability

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Patricia Conrod;Patricia Conrod

  • Two-Year Impact of Personality-Targeted, Teacher-Delivered Interventions on Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Cluster-Randomized Trial

    Maeve O’Leary-Barrett;Lauren Topper;Nadia Al-Khudhairy;Robert O. Pihl

  • Personality Correlates of the Common and Unique Variance Across Conduct Disorder and Substance Misuse Symptoms in Adolescence

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Patricia J. Conrod;Patricia J. Conrod

  • Adolescent bullying, cannabis use and emerging psychotic experiences: a longitudinal general population study.

    C. J. Mackie;M. O'Leary-Barrett;N. Al-Khudhairy;N. Castellanos-Ryan

  • Age of Cannabis Use Onset and Adult Drug Abuse Symptoms: A Prospective Study of Common Risk Factors and Indirect Effects:

    Charlie Rioux;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro

  • Differential susceptibility to environmental influences: Interactions between child temperament and parenting in adolescent alcohol use.

    Charlie Rioux;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro

  • The Predictive Value of Head Circumference Growth during the First Year of Life on Early Child Traits.

    Caroline Dupont;Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Jean R. Séguin;Gina Muckle

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia J. Conrod
Patricia J. Conrod University of Montreal
Jean R. Séguin
Jean R. Séguin University of Montreal
Richard E. Tremblay
Richard E. Tremblay University of Montreal
Frank Vitaro
Frank Vitaro University of Montreal
Sylvana M. Côté
Sylvana M. Côté University of Montreal
Michel Boivin
Michel Boivin Université Laval
Marie-Claude Geoffroy
Marie-Claude Geoffroy McGill University
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Massimiliano Orri
Massimiliano Orri McGill University
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a psychology degree in the USA, there are many related online options and career paths available. Popular roles include mental health counselor, clinical therapist, and social worker. Each state has its own unique licensure requirements and educational pathways, so it's important to understand the specifics for your preferred location.

For example, review the mental health counselor requirements in Sacramento to learn about local licensing and degree expectations. The Saint Paul mental health counselor education requirements break down the steps to enter the field in Minnesota, which differ from other regions.

If you plan to work in Texas, understanding the San Antonio mental health counselor certification requirements is essential. In California, there are specific guidelines for how to become a mental health counselor in San Diego.

Exploring online psychology degrees can provide flexibility while meeting these qualifications. Take time to compare programs and state regulations to find the right pathway for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Castellanos-Ryan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles