World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3656
World Ranking
10660
National Ranking
615

Anita S. Mak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita S. Mak sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anita S. Mak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita S. Mak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anita S. Mak is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a notable emphasis on clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, and health. Their scholarly output includes seven publications in clinical psychology-related fields and four in medicine.

The main topics covered in Anita S. Mak's work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Gun Ownership and Violence Research

Recent publications by Anita S. Mak highlight a focus on early maladaptive schemas in youth, their relationship with mental health, and self-injurious behaviors. These include:

  • The Relationships Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Youth Mental Health: A Systematic Review, 2020, Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Early maladaptive schemas in young people who self-injure, 2021, Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Emotion regulation as a mediator between early maladaptive schemas and non-suicidal self-injury in youth, 2022, Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
  • The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and the functions of self-injurious behaviour in youth, 2022, Clinical Psychologist

Anita S. Mak has frequently collaborated with several researchers. The coauthors with whom they have worked extensively include:

  • A. R. Nicol
  • Kristen Murray
  • Phillip S. Kavanagh
  • Iain Walker
  • Dean Buckmaster

Their work has appeared in multiple publication venues that intersect both clinical and behavioral therapy, such as:

  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Clinical Psychologist
  • Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy

Best Publications

  • Good for the Soul: the relationship between work, wellbeing and psychological capital

    Kenneth Cole;Anne Daly;Anita Mak

  • Ethnic identification, self-esteem and immigrant psychological health

    Drew Nesdale;Anita S Mak

  • Immigrant acculturation attitudes and host country identification

    Drew Nesdale;Anita S Mak

  • Psychosocial safety climate moderating the effects of daily job demands and recovery on fatigue and work engagement

    Adam Garrick;Anita S. Mak;Stuart Cathcart;Peter C. Winwood

  • Personality and family influences on adolescent attitudes to school and self-rated academic performance

    Patrick C.L Heaven;Anita Mak;Jocelyn Barry;Joseph Ciarrochi

  • Optimising conditions for learning sociocultural competencies for success

    Anita S Mak;Marvin J Westwood;F.Ishu Ishiyama;Michelle C Barker

  • The impact of adolescent and parental characteristics on adolescent levels of delinquency and depression

    Patrick C.L Heaven;Kathryn Newbury;Anita Mak

  • Job insecurity, coping resources and personality dispositions in occupational strain

    Anita S. Mak;Jason Mueller

  • A Self‐Report Delinquency Scale for Australian Adolescents

    Anita S. Mak

  • Measuring social self-efficacy in a culturally diverse student population

    Cynthia Fan;Anita S. Mak

  • Contact and Attitudes Toward International Students in Australia Intergroup Anxiety and Intercultural Communication Emotions as Mediators

    Anita S. Mak;Patricia M. Brown;Danielle Wadey

  • Big five personality and cultural relocation factors in Vietnamese Australian students’ intercultural social self-efficacy

    Anita S. Mak;Catherine Tran

  • Does cross-cultural training in tertiary education enhance cross-cultural adjustment? A systematic review

    Alison Sit;Anita S. Mak;James T. Neill

  • Beyond communication courses: Are there benefits in adding skills-based ExcelL™ sociocultural training?

    Anita S. Mak;Kirsten Buckingham

  • Parental neglect and overprotection as risk factors in delinquency

    Anita S. Mak

  • Testing a Psychosocial Control Theory of Delinquency

    Anita S. Mak

  • Migrant distress: The role of perceived racial discrimination and coping resources.

    Anita S. Mak;Drew Nesdale

  • The Relationships Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Youth Mental Health: A Systematic Review

    Annemarie Nicol;Anita S. Mak;Kristen Murray;Iain Walker

  • Gender and personality influences in adolescent threat and challenge appraisals and depressive symptoms

    Anita S Mak;Kelly Blewitt;Patrick C.L Heaven

  • Psychosocial Control Characteristics of Delinquents and Nondelinquents

    Anita S. Mak

  • Do adolescent delinquency and problem drinking share psychosocial risk factors? A literature review

    Angela L. Curcio;Anita S. Mak;Amanda M. George

  • Strategies used by nurses, academics and students to overcome intercultural communication challenges

    Saras Henderson;Michelle Barker;Anita Mak

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick C. L. Heaven
Patrick C. L. Heaven Australian Catholic University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Drew Nesdale
Drew Nesdale Griffith University
Ken Rigby
Ken Rigby University of South Australia
Phillip T. Slee
Phillip T. Slee Flinders University
Joseph Ciarrochi
Joseph Ciarrochi Australian Catholic University
Colleen Ward
Colleen Ward Victoria University of Wellington
Craig A. Olsson
Craig A. Olsson Deakin University
Iain Walker
Iain Walker University of Melbourne
Nicholas B. Allen
Nicholas B. Allen University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and flexible career options. Many students choose to move beyond undergraduate study and explore advanced degrees, such as a master’s in counseling, which is often required for licensure as a professional counselor.

It's important to understand that licensure requirements vary widely by state. For those interested in practicing in Tennessee, you should review the Tennessee licensed professional counselor requirements for specific educational and examination guidelines. Similarly, if you’re considering Texas, be aware of the unique steps outlined under the Texas licensed professional counselor requirements.

In other states like Utah and Vermont, aspiring counselors must also familiarize themselves with the local licensure process. The Utah lpc licensure requirements and lpc licensure requirements in Vermont provide valuable information for preparing your application and planning your career pathway.

Choosing the right online psychology degree and understanding state requirements are essential steps for a successful career in counseling or mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Anita S. Mak

Trending Scientists