World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
8948
World Ranking
4104
National Ranking
1182

Andriy Kryshtafovych publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andriy Kryshtafovych sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Andriy Kryshtafovych D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andriy Kryshtafovych sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andriy Kryshtafovych is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, encompassing 79 publications. Subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Structural Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Cell Biology.

The main topics addressed in their work cover a range of areas with significant emphasis on Protein Structure and Dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Enzyme Structure and Function, RNA modifications and cancer, Machine Learning in Bioinformatics, Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications, and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease.

Frequently publishing in the journal Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, Andriy Kryshtafovych has contributed to 28 publications in that venue alone. Other common venues for their work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Methods, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology.

Significant recent papers authored by Andriy Kryshtafovych include:

  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV, 2021, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XV, 2023, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
  • New prediction categories in CASP15, 2023, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authorship with John Moult, Krzysztof Fidelis, Wah Chiu, Maya Topf, and Rachael C. Kretsch.

Andriy Kryshtafovych's work spans both experimental and computational approaches to understanding biological macromolecules, with particular attention to protein structure prediction and validation. The research often intersects with advanced microscopy techniques and the application of machine learning in bioinformatics.

Best Publications

  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Torsten Schwede;Maya Topf;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Torsten Schwede;Maya Topf;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII.

    John Moult;Krzysztof Fidelis;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Burkhard Rost

  • Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI

    John Moult;Krzysztof Fidelis;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Torsten Schwede

  • Assessment of protein disorder region predictions in CASP10.

    Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Andriy Kryshtafovych;John Moult;Anna Tramontano

  • Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment.

    Marc F. Lensink;Sameer Velankar;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Shen You Huang

  • Outcome of a Workshop on Applications of Protein Models in Biomedical Research

    Torsten Schwede;Andrej Sali;Barry Honig;Michael Levitt

  • Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9

    Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Krzysztof Fidelis;John Moult;Anna Tramontano

  • CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Cryo-EM model validation recommendations based on outcomes of the 2019 EMDataResource challenge

    Catherine L. Lawson;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Paul D. Adams;Pavel V. Afonine

  • Assessment of hard target modeling in CASP12 reveals an emerging role of alignment-based contact prediction methods.

    Luciano A. Abriata;Luciano A. Abriata;Giorgio E. Tamò;Giorgio E. Tamò;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Andriy Kryshtafovych

  • Progress from CASP6 to CASP7

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Krzysztof Fidelis;John Moult

  • Evaluation of the template-based modeling in CASP12.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Krzysztof Fidelis;John Moult

  • New encouraging developments in contact prediction: Assessment of the CASP11 results

    Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Daniel D'Andrea;Krzysztof Fidelis;Anna Tramontano

  • Challenging the State of the Art in Protein Structure Prediction: Highlights of Experimental Target Structures for the 10Th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment Casp10.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;John Moult;Patrick Bales;J. Fernando Bazan

  • Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Krzysztof Fidelis;Torsten Schwede;Torsten Schwede

  • Assessing the accuracy of contact predictions in CASP13.

    Rojan Shrestha;Eduardo Fajardo;Nelson Gil;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12.

    Aleix Lafita;Spencer Bliven;Spencer Bliven;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Martino Bertoni

  • Discovering regulatory binding-site modules using rule-based learning

    Torgeir R. Hvidsten;Bartosz Wilczyński;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Jerzy Tiuryn

  • Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue–residue contacts

    Patrik Björkholm;Pawel Daniluk;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system.

    Andriy Kryshtafovych;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Generalized modeling of enzyme–ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures

    Helena Strömbergsson;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Peteris Prusis;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures

    Kliment Olechnovič;Bohdan Monastyrskyy;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Česlovas Venclovas

  • Assessment of prediction methods for protein structures determined by NMR in CASP14: Impact of AlphaFold2.

    Yuanpeng Janet Huang;Ning Zhang;Beate Bersch;Krzysztof Fidelis

  • A novel approach to fold recognition using sequence-derived properties from sets of structurally similar local fragments of proteins

    Torgeir R. Hvidsten;Andriy Kryshtafovych;Jan Komorowski;Krzysztof Fidelis

Frequent Co-Authors

John Moult
John Moult University of Maryland, College Park
Torsten Schwede
Torsten Schwede University of Basel
Anna Tramontano
Anna Tramontano Sapienza University of Rome
Wah Chiu
Wah Chiu Stanford University
Andrzej Joachimiak
Andrzej Joachimiak Argonne National Laboratory
Paul D. Adams
Paul D. Adams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Lisa N. Kinch
Lisa N. Kinch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Helen M. Berman
Helen M. Berman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gaetano T. Montelione
Gaetano T. Montelione Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Nick V. Grishin
Nick V. Grishin The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andriy Kryshtafovych

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles