World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 63 1818 18 173 12026

Amos B. Oppenheim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amos B. Oppenheim between 1967 and 2011, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amos B. Oppenheim published across 45 years, from 1967 to 2011, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1995. 2 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2011. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1995. 1967: 2 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 11 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication
1967 2011

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amos B. Oppenheim: publications per year, 1967 to 2011
Year Publications
1967 2
1968 0
1969 2
1970 2
1971 1
1972 2
1973 1
1974 3
1975 4
1976 6
1977 6
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 7
1986 3
1987 5
1988 4
1989 9
1990 4
1991 11
1992 10
1993 8
1994 5
1995 12
1996 12
1997 11
1998 4
1999 1
2000 11
2001 4
2002 2
2003 3
2004 5
2005 6
2006 5
2007 6
2008 6
2009 3
2010 1
2011 1
Total 200
Download as CSV

Amos B. Oppenheim publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos B. Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 173 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131 173
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Amos B. Oppenheim D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos B. Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105 63
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Amos B. Oppenheim is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their academic profile is marked primarily by this association, although specific details regarding recent publications or frequent co-authors are not available.

The scope of their work, including main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of research, is not detailed in the accessible data. Consequently, precise areas of specialization or research contributions cannot be enumerated.

No record of book publications or awards associated with Amos B. Oppenheim is present in the current data set. Additionally, there are no listed scientific papers or publication venues to provide insight into their research dissemination.

This profile reflects available factual data without extrapolation on their academic productivity or influence. Amos B. Oppenheim remains listed as an active researcher, as there is no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Switches in bacteriophage lambda development.

    Amos B. Oppenheim;Oren Kobiler;Joel Stavans;Donald L. Court

  • Crystal structure of a bacterial chitinase at 2.3 Å resolution

    Anastassis Perrakis;Ivo Tews;Zbigniew Dauter;Amos B Oppenheim

  • Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent protease which degrades the heat-shock transcription factor sigma 32.

    T. Tomoyasu;J. Gamer;B. Bukau;M. Kanemori

  • The Thylakoid FtsH Protease Plays a Role in the Light-Induced Turnover of the Photosystem II D1 Protein

    Marika Lindahl;Cornelia Spetea;Cornelia Spetea;Torill Hundal;Torill Hundal;Amos B. Oppenheim

  • Bacterial chitobiase structure provides insight into catalytic mechanism and the basis of Tay-Sachs disease.

    Ivo Tews;Anastassis Perrakis;Amos Oppenheim;Zbigniew Dauter

  • High-sensitivity bacterial detection using biotin-tagged phage and quantum-dot nanocomplexes.

    Rotem Edgar;Michael McKinstry;Jeeseong Hwang;Amos B. Oppenheim

  • Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes

    M. F. Hammer;A. J. Redd;E. T. Wood;M. R. Bonner

  • Recombineering: Genetic Engineering in Bacteria Using Homologous Recombination

    Lynn Thomason;Donald L. Court;Mikail Bubunenko;Nina Costantino

  • Differential mRNA stability of the cspA gene in the cold-shock response of Escherichia coli.

    Daniel Goldenberg;Idit Azar;Amos B. Oppenheim

  • Increased bending rigidity of single DNA molecules by H-NS, a temperature and osmolarity sensor.

    Roee Amit;Amos B. Oppenheim;Joel Stavans

  • Control of plant diseases by chitinase expressed from cloned DNA in Escherichia coli

    R. Shapira;A. Ordentlich;I. Chet;A.B. Oppenheim

  • Differential expression of Trichoderma harzianum chitinases during mycoparasitism

    S. Haran;H. Schickler;A. Oppenheim;I. Chet

  • A New Look at Bacteriophage λ Genetic Networks

    Donald L. Court;Amos B. Oppenheim;Amos B. Oppenheim;Sankar L. Adhya

  • Mechanisms of biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens by Rhizobacteria

    I. Chet;A. Ordentlich;R. Shapira;A. Oppenheim

  • New components of the chitinolytic system of Trichoderma harzianum

    Shoshan Haran;Hedva Schickler;Amos Oppenheim;Ilan Chet

  • Molecular cloning, structural analysis, and expression in Escherichia coli of a chitinase gene from Enterobacter agglomerans.

    L S Chernin;L De la Fuente;V Sobolev;S Haran

  • Expression of the genes coding for the Escherichia coli integration host factor are controlled by growth phase, rpoS, ppGpp and by autoregulation

    Michal Aviv;Hilla Giladi;Gideon Schreiber;Amos B. Oppenheim

  • Compaction of single DNA molecules induced by binding of integration host factor (IHF).

    B. M. Jaffar Ali;Roee Amit;Ido Braslavsky;Amos B. Oppenheim

  • Proteolysis of the phage lambda CII regulatory protein by FtsH (HflB) of Escherichia coli.

    Y. Shotland;S. Koby;D. Teff;N. Mansur

  • Alternative mRNA structures of the cIII gene of bacteriophage λ determine the rate of its translation initiation

    Shoshy Altuvia;Daniel Kornitzer;Dinah Teff;Amos B. Oppenheim

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilan Chet
Ilan Chet Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Donald L. Court
Donald L. Court National Institutes of Health
Sankar Adhya
Sankar Adhya National Institutes of Health
Marlene Belfort
Marlene Belfort University at Albany, State University of New York
Max E. Gottesman
Max E. Gottesman Columbia University Medical Center
David M. Goldenberg
David M. Goldenberg Immunomedics (United States)
Jaacov Katan
Jaacov Katan Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ilan Rosenshine
Ilan Rosenshine Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Yoram Kapulnik
Yoram Kapulnik BARD The U.S.-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund
Hanah Margalit
Hanah Margalit Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to diverse fields, but many students also explore related disciplines online. For those interested in blending science with counseling, an online master's degree in counseling offers the flexibility to study human behavior and mental health from home. This option allows science-minded students to support others emotionally, drawing on their scientific background.

Another route is taking a clinical psychology online degree to build a career in behavioral science and mental health. The demand for professionals skilled in biology and psychology is increasing in healthcare and research environments.

If you're seeking a faster track, consider an accelerated human services degree online. These programs are often tailored for those wanting to work directly in community outreach, advising, or advocacy, and can be completed quickly to jump-start a new career.

Additionally, those with a teaching background in science may be interested in how to make a career change from teacher to SLP (speech pathologist). This transition leverages scientific knowledge in communication disorders, offering impactful new directions for career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Amos B. Oppenheim

Recently Published Articles