World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 41 1969 1823 9 9 215 4996

Alojz Ivankovic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alojz Ivankovic between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alojz Ivankovic published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2013. 23 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2013. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 8 publications
1967 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alojz Ivankovic: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 5
2001 1
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 4
2008 4
2009 9
2010 6
2011 12
2012 13
2013 21
2014 19
2015 12
2016 11
2017 8
2018 9
2019 7
2020 13
2021 6
2022 5
2023 15
2024 15
2025 8
Total 236
Download as CSV

Alojz Ivankovic publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alojz Ivankovic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 215 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 215
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Alojz Ivankovic D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alojz Ivankovic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100 41
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Effect of core–shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer

    Dong Quan;Alojz Ivankovic

  • High strain rate properties of selected aluminium alloys

    L. Djapic Oosterkamp;A. Ivankovic;G. Venizelos

  • Mechanical characterisation of polyurethane elastomer for biomedical applications.

    Valentine Kanyanta;Alojz Ivankovic

  • Enhancing mode-I and mode-II fracture toughness of epoxy and carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composites using multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    Dong Quan;Josu Labarga Urdániz;Alojz Ivanković

  • Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test

    I. Georgiou;H. Hadavinia;A. Ivanković;A.J. Kinloch

  • Toughened carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites with nanoparticle modified epoxy matrices

    D. Carolan;D. Carolan;A. Ivankovic;A. J. Kinloch;S. Sprenger

  • Toughening of epoxy-based hybrid nanocomposites

    D. Carolan;D. Carolan;A. Ivankovic;A.J. Kinloch;S. Sprenger

  • OpenFOAM Finite Volume Solver for Fluid-Solid Interaction

    Željko Tuković;Aleksandar Karač;Philip Cardiff;Hrvoje Jasak

  • A block-coupled Finite Volume methodology for linear elasticity and unstructured meshes

    P. Cardiff;Ž. Tuković;H. Jasak;A. Ivanković

  • Modelling the fracture behaviour of adhesively-bonded joints as a function of test rate

    A. Karac;B.R.K. Blackman;V. Cooper;A.J. Kinloch

  • Application of the finite volume method to the analysis of dynamic fracture problems

    A. Ivankovic;I. Demirdzic;J. G. Williams;P. S. Leevers

  • A large strain finite volume method for orthotropic bodies with general material orientations

    Philip Cardiff;Aleksandar Karac;Alojz Ivankovic

  • Interlaminar fracture toughness of aerospace-grade carbon fibre reinforced plastics interleaved with thermoplastic veils

    Dong Quan;Francesca Bologna;Gennaro Scarselli;Alojz Ivankovic

  • Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints

    V. Cooper;A. Ivankovic;A. Karac;D. McAuliffe

  • Finite-volume stress analysis in multi-material linear elastic body

    Željko Tuković;Alojz Ivanković;Aleksandar Karač

  • Validation of a fluid–structure interaction numerical model for predicting flow transients in arteries

    Valentine Kanyanta;Alojz Ivankovic;Aleksandar Karac

  • The prediction of dynamic fracture evolution in PMMA using a cohesive zone model

    Neal Murphy;Alojz Ivankovic

  • Mechanical and fracture properties of epoxy adhesives modified with graphene nanoplatelets and rubber particles

    Dong Quan;Declan Carolan;Clemence Rouge;Neal Murphy

  • Crack growth predictions in polyethylene using measured traction¿separation curves

    A. Ivankovic;K.C. Pandya;J.G. Williams

  • An open-source finite volume toolbox for solid mechanics and fluid-solid interaction simulations

    Philip Cardiff;Aleksandar Karac;Peter De Jaeger;Alojz Ivankovic

Frequent Co-Authors

James G. Williams
James G. Williams Imperial College London
Anthony J. Kinloch
Anthony J. Kinloch Imperial College London
Denis P. Dowling
Denis P. Dowling University College Dublin
Ambrose C. Taylor
Ambrose C. Taylor Imperial College London
René Alderliesten
René Alderliesten Delft University of Technology
Rinze Benedictus
Rinze Benedictus Delft University of Technology
Wenxin Wang
Wenxin Wang University College Dublin
Michael D. Gilchrist
Michael D. Gilchrist University College Dublin
Bamber R.K. Blackman
Bamber R.K. Blackman Imperial College London
Guoqun Zhao
Guoqun Zhao Shandong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related online degrees offer valuable alternatives. Programs such as the accelerated bcba program online allow professionals to speed up certification in applied behavior analysis, opening doors in fields like human factors engineering and UX design.

When considering graduate programs, students should be strategic about applications. Similar to the advice found for speech-language pathology (SLP) programs, it's important to understand how many slp grad schools should i apply to, ensuring a balanced approach between reach and safety schools for admission.

Finding a program with accessible entry requirements can ease the transition into specialized studies. Research on easiest online slp programs to get into highlights that selecting programs with flexible admissions criteria can benefit those pivoting careers or balancing work-study schedules.

Cost is a crucial consideration when pursuing online education. Prospective students can benefit from reviewing information on how much does an online speech pathology degree cost, as it provides insights into tuition and fees that are often comparable across diverse online engineering and technical programs.

Best Scientists Citing Alojz Ivankovic

Recently Published Articles