World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
12201
World Ranking
3268
National Ranking
1267

Alfred O. Nier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred O. Nier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alfred O. Nier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred O. Nier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - V.M. Goldschmidt Award, Geochemical Society
  • 1962 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • 1956 - Arthur L. Day Medal, The Geological Society of America
  • 1950 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1947 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1938 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS)

Overview

Alfred O. Nier was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States during their scientific career. Their work contributed to fields intersecting geology, geophysics, and physical sciences, as suggested by their recognition from several scientific societies related to these areas.

Nier received multiple honors over the course of their career, reflecting a wide acknowledgment across different scientific communities. These awards included the V.M. Goldschmidt Award from the Geochemical Society in 1984. Earlier, they had been named a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 1962 and received the Arthur L. Day Medal from The Geological Society of America in 1956.

Nier's recognition also extended to membership and fellowships in prestigious organizations. They became a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1950. Additionally, they were a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) starting in 1947 and a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) as early as 1938.

No detailed records of their research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or specific topics of study are available in the provided data. However, the breadth and timing of their awards indicate sustained involvement in geochemical and geophysical research throughout the mid-20th century.

Their career exemplified long-term engagement with scientific societies and recognition by peer communities in geology, geophysics, and physical sciences. The combination of fellowships and awards from multiple leading organizations suggests contributions that intersected these fields, though precise details about publications or research focus were not recorded in the available information.

Best Publications

  • A Redetermination of the Relative Abundances of the Isotopes of Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, and Potassium

    Alfred O. Nier

  • The search for organic substances and inorganic volatile compounds in the surface of Mars

    K. Biemann;J. Oro;P. Toulmin;L. E. Orgel

  • A mass spectrometer for Isotope and gas analysis

    Alfred O. Nier

  • Composition and structure of Mars' Upper atmosphere: Results from the neutral mass spectrometers on Viking 1 and 2

    A. O. Nier;M. B. McElroy

  • A Mass Spectrometer for Routine Isotope Abundance Measurements

    Alfred O. Nier

  • Search for organic and volatile inorganic compounds in two surface samples from the chryse planitia region of Mars.

    K. Biemann;John Oro;P. Toulmin;Leslie E. Orgel

  • Variations in the Relative Abundance of the Carbon Isotopes

    Alfred O. Nier;Earl A. Gulbransen

  • A Redetermination of the Relative Abundances of the Isotopes of Neon, Krypton, Rubidium, Xenon, and Mercury

    Alfred O. Nier

  • The Isotopic Constitution of Strontium, Barium, Bismuth, Thallium and Mercury

    Alfred O. Nier

  • The open‐source neutral‐mass spectrometer on Atmosphere Explorer‐C, ‐D, and ‐E

    A. O. Nier;W. E. Potter;D. R. Hickman;K. Mauersberger

  • The upper atmosphere of Venus during morning conditions

    U. von Zahn;K. H. Fricke;D. M. Hunten;D. Krankowsky

  • The Isotopic Constitution of Osmium

    Alfred O. Nier

  • Angular Aberrations in Sector Shaped Electromagnetic Lenses for Focusing Beams of Charged Particles

    Edgar G. Johnson;Alfred O. Nier

  • Isotopic composition of nitrogen: implications for the past history of mars' atmosphere.

    Michael B. Mcelroy;Yuk Ling Yung;Alfred O. Nier

  • The Isotopic Constitution of Lead and the Measurement of Geological Time. III

    Alfred O. Nier;Robert W. Thompson;Byron F. Murphey

  • The Isotopic Constitution of Radiogenic Leads and the Measurement of Geological Time. II

    Alfred O. Nier

  • Composition and structure of the martian atmosphere: preliminary results from viking 1.

    A. O. Nier;W. B. Hanson;A. Seiff;M. B. McELROY

  • The distribution of cosmic‐ray‐produced rare gases in iron meteorites

    P. Signer;A. O. Nier

  • Argon 40 in Potassium Minerals

    L. T. Aldrich;Alfred O. Nier

  • Variations in the Relative Abundances of the Isotopes of Common Lead from Various Sources

    Alfred O. Nier

  • Variations in the Relative Abundance of the Carbon Isotopes

    Byron F. Murphey;Alfred O. Nier

Frequent Co-Authors

W. B. Hanson
W. B. Hanson The University of Texas at Dallas
Michael B. McElroy
Michael B. McElroy Harvard University
Peter Simmonds
Peter Simmonds University of Oxford
Nelson W. Spencer
Nelson W. Spencer Goddard Space Flight Center
Leslie E. Orgel
Leslie E. Orgel Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Donald M. Hunten
Donald M. Hunten University of Arizona
David W. Rusch
David W. Rusch University of Colorado Boulder
Yuk L. Yung
Yuk L. Yung California Institute of Technology
Tobias Owen
Tobias Owen University of Hawaii at Manoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that intersect with public policy, social issues, and education. For those interested in leadership roles within government or nonprofit sectors, exploring the best online MPA programs can provide essential skills in public administration and environmental policy management.

Understanding the social dynamics influencing environmental challenges is crucial. Pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online helps students analyze human behavior and societal structures, which is valuable for roles in community engagement and environmental advocacy.

For educators aiming to integrate environmental content into curricula or lead educational initiatives, advanced degrees matter. Options such as online EdD programs without dissertation offer flexible routes to doctoral studies, focusing more on practical applications than traditional research.

Additionally, professionals looking to advance from a master’s to a doctorate in education can benefit from specialized EdS to EdD bridge program options. These pathways often allow environmental educators to enhance their leadership capabilities and broader impact on environmental education policy.

Best Scientists Citing Alfred O. Nier

Recently Published Articles