World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 58 10652 9620 253 241 195 11561
Environmental Sciences 58 3277 3134 118 114 220 11944

Albert L. Juhasz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albert L. Juhasz between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albert L. Juhasz published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 32 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 9 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 12 publications
1993 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albert L. Juhasz: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 9
2001 2
2002 2
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 8
2009 8
2010 6
2011 9
2012 7
2013 10
2014 12
2015 9
2016 10
2017 10
2018 11
2019 15
2020 15
2021 13
2022 19
2023 19
2024 20
2025 12
Total 258
Download as CSV

Albert L. Juhasz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert L. Juhasz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 220 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282 220
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Albert L. Juhasz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert L. Juhasz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166 58
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Albert L. Juhasz is a researcher affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics addressed in their body of work include:

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

Albert L. Juhasz has published extensively in several academic journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal (15 publications)
  • Environmental Science & Technology (12 publications)
  • Environmental Pollution (12 publications)
  • The Science of The Total Environment (10 publications)
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (7 publications)

Their recent research papers include:

  • "Health-related toxicity of emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Comparison to legacy PFOS and PFOA" (2022, Environmental Research)
  • "Biofilms Enhance the Adsorption of Toxic Contaminants on Plastic Microfibers under Environmentally Relevant Conditions" (2021, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • "Application of native plants in constructed floating wetlands as a passive remediation approach for PFAS-impacted surface water" (2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials)
  • "Insights into the fate of antimony (Sb) in contaminated soils: Ageing influence on Sb mobility, bioavailability, bioaccessibility and speciation" (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Acute toxicity, oxidative stress and DNA damage of chlorpyrifos to earthworms (Eisenia fetida): The difference between artificial and natural soils" (2020, Chemosphere)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Q. Lena, Hongbo Li, Farzana Kastury, Hongshou Huang, and Nicole Stanford. These co-authors have contributed to multiple publications alongside Albert L. Juhasz, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Bioremediation of high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review of the microbial degradation of benzo[a]pyrene.

    Albert L Juhasz;Ravendra Naidu

  • In Vivo Assessment of Arsenic Bioavailability in Rice and Its Significance for Human Health Risk Assessment

    Albert L. Juhasz;Euan Smith;John Weber;Matthew Rees

  • Health-related toxicity of emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Comparison to legacy PFOS and PFOA.

    Unknown

  • A critical review of approaches and limitations of inhalation bioavailability and bioaccessibility of metal(loid)s from ambient particulate matter or dust.

    Farzana Kastury;Euan Smith;Albert L. Juhasz

  • Degradation of fluoranthene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene and dibenz[a,h]anthracene by Burkholderia cepacia

    A.L. Juhasz;M.L. Britz;G.A. Stanley

  • Assessment of Four Commonly Employed in Vitro Arsenic Bioaccessibility Assays for Predicting in Vivo Relative Arsenic Bioavailability in Contaminated Soils

    Albert L. Juhasz;John Weber;Euan Smith;Ravi Naidu

  • Biofilms Enhance the Adsorption of Toxic Contaminants on Plastic Microfibers under Environmentally Relevant Conditions.

    Geetika Bhagwat;Thi Kim Anh Tran;Dane Lamb;Kala Senathirajah

  • Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils.

    Albert L. Juhasz;Euan Smith;John Weber;Matthew Rees

  • Chromium-Microorganism Interactions in Soils: Remediation Implications

    Sara P.B. Kamaludeen;Mallavarapu Megharaj;Mallavarapu Megharaj;Albert L. Juhasz;Albert L. Juhasz;Nabrattil Sethunathan;Nabrattil Sethunathan

  • Microbial degradation and detoxification of high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain VUN 10,003.

    A.L. Juhasz;G.A. Stanley;M.L. Britz

  • Soils contaminated with explosives: Environmental fate and evaluation of state-of- the-art remediation processes (IUPAC Technical Report)*

    Dimitrios Kalderis;Albert L. Juhasz;Raj Boopathy;Steve Comfort

  • In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils.

    Albert L. Juhasz;Euan Smith;John Weber;Matthew Rees

  • Biochar increases arsenic release from an anaerobic paddy soil due to enhanced microbial reduction of iron and arsenic.

    Ning Wang;Xi-Mei Xue;Albert L. Juhasz;Zhi-Zhou Chang

  • Evaluation of SBRC-gastric and SBRC-intestinal methods for the prediction of in vivo relative lead bioavailability in contaminated soils.

    Albert L. Juhasz;John Weber;Euan Smith;Ravi Naidu

  • Determination of Cadmium Relative Bioavailability in Contaminated Soils and Its Prediction Using in Vitro Methodologies

    Albert L. Juhasz;John Weber;Ravi Naidu;Dorota Gancarz

  • Assessing the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of metals and metalloids

    Jack C. Ng;Albert Juhasz;Euan Smith;Ravi Naidu

  • Assessment of in vitro lead bioaccessibility in house dust and its relationship to in vivo lead relative bioavailability.

    Hong-Bo Li;Xin-Yi Cui;Kan Li;Jie Li

  • In Vivo-in Vitro and XANES Spectroscopy Assessments of Lead Bioavailability in Contaminated Periurban Soils

    Euan Smith;Euan Smith;Ivan M Kempson;Albert L Juhasz;Albert L Juhasz;John Weber;John Weber

  • Impact of soil particle size and bioaccessibility on children and adult lead exposure in peri-urban contaminated soils.

    Albert L. Juhasz;John Weber;John Weber;Euan Smith;Euan Smith

  • Assessment of Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility for Human Health Exposure Assessment: A Critical Review

    Ilia Rostami;Albert L. Juhasz

  • Arsenic uptake and speciation in rice plants grown under greenhouse conditions with arsenic contaminated irrigation water.

    E. Smith;A.L. Juhasz;J. Weber;R. Naidu

Frequent Co-Authors

Euan Smith
Euan Smith University of South Australia
Lena Q. Ma
Lena Q. Ma Zhejiang University
Ravi Naidu
Ravi Naidu University of Newcastle Australia
Kirk G. Scheckel
Kirk G. Scheckel Environmental Protection Agency
Andrew S. Ball
Andrew S. Ball RMIT University
Enzo Lombi
Enzo Lombi University of South Australia
Mallavarapu Megharaj
Mallavarapu Megharaj University of Newcastle Australia
Jun Wang
Jun Wang Shandong Agricultural University
David J. Thomas
David J. Thomas Environmental Protection Agency
Nanthi Bolan
Nanthi Bolan University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can significantly enhance your expertise and career prospects. Many students explore a geology online degree to better understand earth processes and resource management. This foundation is critical for roles in environmental consulting, resource extraction, and conservation.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly vital in environmental fields. Studying at one of the best GIS schools offers hands-on experience with spatial data analysis, which supports informed decision-making in land use, urban planning, and environmental protection.

Beyond science and technology, public policy significantly shapes environmental outcomes. Many professionals enhance their impact by pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration, gaining skills in governance, policy development, and sustainable resource management.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important. An online sociology degree provides insight into human-environment interactions and community engagement. Exploring the best online sociology bachelor degree programs can prepare students to address environmental challenges through social research and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Albert L. Juhasz

Trending Scientists