World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5708 5471 2075 1919 127 10285

Aaron D. Peacock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aaron D. Peacock between 1999 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aaron D. Peacock published across 20 years, from 1999 to 2018, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2007. 3 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2007. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications
1999 2018

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aaron D. Peacock: publications per year, 1999 to 2018
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 4
2001 6
2002 7
2003 7
2004 11
2005 9
2006 8
2007 16
2008 12
2009 9
2010 5
2011 5
2012 6
2013 3
2014 4
2015 7
2016 2
2017 1
2018 2
Total 127
Download as CSV

Aaron D. Peacock publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron D. Peacock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 127 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 127
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Aaron D. Peacock D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron D. Peacock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Aaron D. Peacock is affiliated with Microbac Laboratories in the United States. Their recent research contributions mainly involve data associated with the EMSL Project 44700, published in the year 2020.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Aaron D. Peacock include the following:

  • Data for EMSL Project 44700 from March 2020, published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) in 2020
  • Data for EMSL Project 44700 from March 2020, published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) in 2020
  • Data for EMSL Project 44700 from March 2020, published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) in 2020

The frequent publication venue for this scientist is OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), with three publications recorded.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Aaron D. Peacock are:

  • Theresa A. Ramelot
  • Michael Kennedy
  • G.T. Montelione
  • Ljiljana Paša-Tolić
  • Derek R. Lovley

Best Publications

  • PLANT DIVERSITY, SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ARE THERE ANY LINKS?

    Donald R. Zak;William E. Holmes;David C. White;Aaron D. Peacock

  • Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer.

    Robert T. Anderson;Helen A. Vrionis;Irene Ortiz-Bernad;Charles T. Resch

  • Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications

    A.D. Peacock;M.D. Mullen;D.B. Ringelberg;D.D. Tyler

  • In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate-contaminated aquifer.

    J D Istok;J M Senko;L R Krumholz;D Watson

  • Landscape-Level Patterns of Microbial Community Composition and Substrate Use in Upland Forest Ecosystems

    Rachel T. Myers;Donald R. Zak;David C. White;Aaron Peacock

  • Microbial community PLFA and PHB responses to ecosystem restoration in tallgrass prairie soils

    V.L. McKinley;A.D. Peacock;D.C. White

  • Relationships between soil microbial biomass determined by chloroform fumigation-extraction, substrate-induced respiration, and phospholipid fatty acid analysis.

    Vanessa L. Bailey;A. D. Peacock;Jeff L. Smith;Harvey Bolton

  • Diversity and characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in groundwater at a uranium mill tailings site

    Yun-Juan Chang;Aaron D. Peacock;Philip E. Long;John R. Stephen

  • Microbiological and Geochemical Heterogeneity in an in Situ Uranium Bioremediation Field Site

    Helen A. Vrionis;Robert T. Anderson;Irene Ortiz-Bernad;Kathleen R. O'Neill

  • Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: Field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes

    Steven B. Yabusaki;Yilin Fang;Philip E. Long;Charles T. Resch

  • Kineococcus radiotolerans sp. nov., a radiation-resistant, gram-positive bacterium.

    Robert W Phillips;Juergen Wiegel;Christopher J Berry;Carl Fliermans

  • Utilization of microbial biofilms as monitors of bioremediation.

    A. D. Peacock;Y. J. Chang;J. D. Istok;L. Krumholz

  • Microbial incorporation of 13C-labeled acetate at the field scale: detection of microbes responsible for reduction of U(VI).

    Yun-Juan Chang;Philip E. Long;Roland Geyer;Aaron D. Peacock

  • Long-term dynamics of uranium reduction/reoxidation under low sulfate conditions

    John Komlos;Aaron Peacock;Ravi K. Kukkadapu;Peter R. Jaffé

  • Geochemical, mineralogical and microbiological characteristics of sediment from a naturally reduced zone in a uranium-contaminated aquifer

    Kate M. Campbell;Ravi K. Kukkadapu;Nikolla Qafoku;Aaron D. Peacock

  • Indigenous and contaminant microbes in ultradeep mines.

    T. C. Onstott;Duane P. Moser;Susan M. Pfiffner;Jim K. Fredrickson

  • Lipid and carbon isotopic evidence of methane-oxidizing and sulfate-reducing bacteria in association with gas hydrates from the Gulf of Mexico

    Chuanlun L. Zhang;Yiliang Li;Judy D. Wall;Lise Larsen

  • In situ assessment of biodegradation potential using biotraps amended with 13C-labeled benzene or toluene.

    Geyer R;Peacock Ad;Miltner A;Richnow Hh

  • Microbial characterization of a JP-4 fuel-contaminated site using a combined lipid biomarker/polymerase chain reaction--denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE)-based approach.

    John R. Stephen;Yun Juan Chang;Ying Dong Gan;Aaron Peacock

  • Physiological and taxonomic description of the novel autotrophic, metal oxidizing bacterium, Pseudogulbenkiania sp. strain 2002

    Karrie A. Weber;Karrie A. Weber;David B. Hedrick;Aaron D. Peacock;J. Cameron Thrash

  • Prolixibacter bellariivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a sugar-fermenting, psychrotolerant anaerobe of the phylum Bacteroidetes, isolated from a marine-sediment fuel cell

    Dawn E. Holmes;Kelly P. Nevin;Trevor L. Woodard;Aaron D. Peacock

  • Measuring soil microbial community diversity using polar lipid fatty acid and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis data.

    David B Hedrick;Aaron Peacock;John R Stephen;Sarah J Macnaughton

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. White
David C. White University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Philip E. Long
Philip E. Long Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Derek R. Lovley
Derek R. Lovley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Peter R. Jaffé
Peter R. Jaffé Princeton University
Lee R. Krumholz
Lee R. Krumholz University of Oklahoma
Kenneth H. Williams
Kenneth H. Williams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jonathan D. Istok
Jonathan D. Istok Oregon State University
James P. McKinley
James P. McKinley Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Michael J. Wilkins
Michael J. Wilkins Colorado State University
Jillian F. Banfield
Jillian F. Banfield University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career opportunities. For those interested in spatial data and mapping, pursuing gis degree programs offers essential skills in geographic information systems, crucial for environmental monitoring and resource management.

Government and public administration also play key roles in environmental policy. An online mpa degrees provide flexible pathways for professionals to advance in public service careers focused on sustainable development and environmental regulations.

Since environmental issues are deeply connected to social behaviors and community impacts, a bachelors degree in sociology online can enrich understanding of societal factors driving environmental challenges, making graduates valuable in social research and advocacy roles.

For education professionals looking to integrate environmental topics into curricula or leadership roles, online edd programs no dissertation offer advanced degrees with flexible formats, ideal for continuing education without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron D. Peacock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles