World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
17519
World Ranking
18917
National Ranking
9428

William Thomas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Thomas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 183 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William Thomas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Thomas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Thomas is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields of study, primarily focusing on Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their work is distributed across several subfields, including Plant Science, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Infectious Diseases. This diverse scope reflects engagement with both human health and plant biology research areas.

Prominent topics in William Thomas's research portfolio feature an emphasis on Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Crop Yield and Soil Fertility, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Complement System in Diseases, and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies.

They have contributed papers to various academic journals, frequently publishing in the following venues:

  • Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Blood
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

William Thomas has collaborated with several researchers multiple times. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephen MacDonald
  • Tom Bull
  • Maeve P. Crowley
  • Beverley J. Hunt
  • Ana M. Casas

Some of the recent papers they have been involved in are:

  • Heparin resistance in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit, 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
  • Real-world experience with caplacizumab in the management of acute TTP, 2020, Blood
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulant Concentrations in Obese and High Body Weight Patients: A Cohort Study, 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Perspectives on Low Temperature Tolerance and Vernalization Sensitivity in Barley: Prospects for Facultative Growth Habit, 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Diagnostic uncertainty presented barriers to the timely management of acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the United Kingdom between 2014 and 2019, 2022, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Best Publications

  • β-Cell Function and the Development of Diabetes-Related Complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

    Michael W. Steffes;Shalamar Sibley;Melissa Jackson;William Thomas

  • Cystic Fibrosis–Related Diabetes: Current Trends in Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality

    Antoinette Moran;Jordan M Dunitz;Brandon M Nathan;Asad Saeed

  • Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices

    Sheri Crow;Ranjit John;Andrew Boyle;Sara Shumway

  • Effects of dietary fructose on plasma lipids in healthy subjects

    John P Bantle;Susan K Raatz;William Thomas;Angeliki Georgopoulos

  • Concentrated oat β-glucan, a fermentable fiber, lowers serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic adults in a randomized controlled trial

    Katie M Queenan;Maria L Stewart;Kristen N Smith;William Thomas

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Weight Training and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors

    Rehana L. Ahmed;William Thomas;Douglas Yee;Kathryn H. Schmitz

  • Long-term follow-up of patients after coarctation of the aorta repair.

    Olga H Toro-Salazar;Julia Steinberger;William Thomas;Albert P Rocchini

  • A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review.

    Xuanping Zhang;Edward W. Gregg;David F. Williamson;Lawrence E. Barker

  • Behavioral, Virologic, and Immunologic Factors Associated With Acquisition and Severity of Primary Epstein–Barr Virus Infection in University Students

    Henry H. Balfour;Oludare A. Odumade;David O. Schmeling;Beth D. Mullan

  • Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

    Sheri Crow;Dong Chen;Carmelo Milano;William Thomas

  • The health of children adopted from Romania.

    Dana E. Johnson;Laurie C. Miller;Sandra Iverson;William Thomas

  • Age-Specific Prevalence of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection Among Individuals Aged 6–19 Years in the United States and Factors Affecting Its Acquisition

    Henry H. Balfour;Frangiscos Sifakis;Joseph A. Sliman;Jennifer A. Knight

  • Greater satiety response with resistant starch and corn bran in human subjects.

    Holly J. Willis;Alison L. Eldridge;Jeannemarie Beiseigel;William Thomas

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Identifies Deficits in White Matter Microstructure in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes That Correlate With Reduced Neurocognitive Function

    Christopher T. Kodl;Daniel T. Franc;Jyothi P. Rao;Fiona S. Anderson

  • Glucose measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus with dermal interstitial fluid.

    John P Bantle;William Thomas

  • Abnormal glucose metabolism in cystic fibrosis.

    Antoinette Moran;Leah Doherty;Xuewei Wang;William Thomas

  • Cytomegalovirus pneumonia after bone marrow transplantation. Risk factors and response to therapy.

    Helen Enright;Robert Haake;Daniel Weisdorf;Norma Ramsay

  • Prevalence, severity, and predictors of fatigue in subjects with primary Sjögren's syndrome

    Barbara Segal;William Thomas;Tyson Rogers;Joanlise M. Leon

  • Total Fat Intake Modifies Plasma Fatty Acid Composition in Humans

    Susan K. Raatz;Douglas Bibus;William Thomas;Penny Kris-Etherton

  • Spurious reporting of nocturnal hypoglycemia by CGMS in patients with tightly controlled type 1 diabetes.

    Kilty McGowan;William Thomas;Antoinette Moran

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne L. Slavin
Joanne L. Slavin University of Minnesota
Antoinette Moran
Antoinette Moran University of Minnesota
Kathryn H. Schmitz
Kathryn H. Schmitz Pennsylvania State University
Stephen Sidney
Stephen Sidney Kaiser Permanente
Pamela J. Schreiner
Pamela J. Schreiner University of Minnesota
Claude Bouchard
Claude Bouchard Pennington Biomedical Research Center
David R. Jacobs
David R. Jacobs University of Minnesota
Henry H. Balfour
Henry H. Balfour University of Minnesota
Patricia A. Frazier
Patricia A. Frazier University of Minnesota
Lenore J. Launer
Lenore J. Launer National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to various allied health fields and advancement opportunities. For registered nurses looking to elevate their qualifications, rn to np programs provide an accessible pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner through specialized online curricula.

If you’re passionate about preventive healthcare, an online bs in nutrition can prepare you for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, or community health education—all while studying remotely.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, the best online mha programs offer intensive training in healthcare administration, policy, and organizational management, positioning graduates for dynamic careers in hospital or clinic administration.

Busy nurses wanting to further their education without on-site training should consider online rn to bsn programs no clinicals to enhance credentials, boost earning potential, and expand clinical knowledge, all through flexible online learning options.

These online degrees allow you to build a rewarding medical career that fits your lifestyle and goals, broadening your professional horizons within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing William Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles