World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
W. von Hoyningen-Huene

W. von Hoyningen-Huene

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 32 9637 576 106 3502

W. von Hoyningen-Huene publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by W. von Hoyningen-Huene between 1982 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. W. von Hoyningen-Huene published across 33 years, from 1982 to 2014, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2009. 6 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2009. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications
1982 2014

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
W. von Hoyningen-Huene: publications per year, 1982 to 2014
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 4
1995 4
1996 5
1997 3
1998 4
1999 4
2000 6
2001 1
2002 6
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 8
2007 9
2008 6
2009 10
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 1
2014 5
Total 107
Download as CSV

W. von Hoyningen-Huene publications per year - data summary

  • W. von Hoyningen-Huene, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Bremen, has 107 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1982 to 2014.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2014.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1992, 2001 and 2013, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 33 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.5 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2010-2014) hold 23 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1992: 2 publications (0.2 per year); 1993-2003: 41 publications (3.7 per year); 2004-2014: 64 publications (5.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

W. von Hoyningen-Huene publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. von Hoyningen-Huene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 106
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

W. von Hoyningen-Huene publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • W. von Hoyningen-Huene, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Bremen, records 106 publications - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than W. von Hoyningen-Huene, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and W. von Hoyningen-Huene ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

W. von Hoyningen-Huene D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. von Hoyningen-Huene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51 32
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

W. von Hoyningen-Huene D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • W. von Hoyningen-Huene, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Bremen, records 32 D-Index - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than W. von Hoyningen-Huene, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and W. von Hoyningen-Huene ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

W. von Hoyningen-Huene is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany. The scientist's academic profile reflects an association with this institution, which is known for research and teaching across various disciplines.

There are no records of recent papers attributed to W. von Hoyningen-Huene, nor data available regarding frequent co-authors or specific publication venues. Similarly, information about book publications is not present.

The profile lacks details regarding the main fields and subfields of study, as well as any main topics the scientist has worked on. Additionally, no awards or recognitions have been documented.

Although the data set is limited, the ongoing affiliation with a reputable institution suggests continued involvement in academic research or related activities.

Best Publications

  • Aerosols in polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ observations

    C. Tomasi;V. Vitale;A. Lupi;C. Di Carmine

  • Aerosol remote sensing over land: A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments

    A.A. Kokhanovsky;F.-M. Breon;A. Cacciari;E. Carboni

  • Retrieval of aerosol optical thickness over land surfaces from top-of-atmosphere radiance

    W. von Hoyningen-Huene;M. Freitag;J. B. Burrows

  • Impact of the smoke aerosol from Russian forest fires on the atmospheric environment over Korea during May 2003

    Kwon H. Lee;Jeong E. Kim;Young J. Kim;Jhoon Kim

  • Dust mobilization and transport in the northern Sahara during SAMUM 2006 - a meteorological overview

    Peter Knippertz;Albert Ansmann;Dietrich Althausen;Detlef Müller

  • European pollution outbreaks during ACE 2: Optical particle properties inferred from multiwavelength lidar and star-Sun photometry

    Albert Ansmann;Frank Wagner;Detlef Müller;Dietrich Althausen

  • Comparison of Aerosol Single Scattering Albedos Derived by Diverse Techniques in Two North Atlantic Experiments

    P. B. Russell;J. Redemann;B. Schmid;R. W. Bergstrom

  • Trend analysis of aerosol optical thickness and Ångström exponent derived from the global AERONET spectral observations

    J. Yoon;W. von Hoyningen-Huene;A. A. Kokhanovsky;M. Vountas

  • Mineral dust observed with AERONET Sun photometer, Raman lidar, and in situ instruments during SAMUM 2006 : Shape-dependent particle properties

    Detlef Müller;Detlef Müller;Albert Ansmann;Volker Freudenthaler;Konrad Kandler

  • Spectral surface albedo over Morocco and its impact on radiative forcing of Saharan dust

    Eike Bierwirth;Eike Bierwirth;Eike Bierwirth;Manfred Wendisch;Manfred Wendisch;André Ehrlich;André Ehrlich;Birgit Heese;Birgit Heese

  • Arctic smoke – aerosol characteristics during a record smoke event in the European Arctic and its radiative impact

    Renatte Treffeisen;Peter Tunved;Johan Ström;Andreas Herber

  • Possibility of refractive index determination of atmospheric aerosol particles by ground-based solar extinction and scattering measurements

    M. Wendisch;W. Von Hoyningen-Huene

  • Changes in atmospheric aerosol loading retrieved from space-based measurements during the past decade

    J. Yoon;J. Yoon;J. P. Burrows;M. Vountas;W. von Hoyningen-Huene

  • Retrieval of spectral aerosol optical thickness over land using ocean color sensors MERIS and SeaWiFS

    W. von Hoyningen-Huene;J. Yoon;M. Vountas;L. G. Istomina

  • Aerosol optical depth retrieval in the Arctic region using MODIS data over snow

    Linlu Mei;Linlu Mei;Yong Xue;Yong Xue;Gerrit de Leeuw;Gerrit de Leeuw;Gerrit de Leeuw;Wolfgang von Hoyningen-Huene

  • Estimating a relationship between aerosol optical thickness and surface wind speed over the ocean

    Paul Glantz;E.D. Nilsson;W. von Hoyningen-Huene

  • Desert dust aerosol air mass mapping in the western Sahara, using particle properties derived from space-based multi-angle imaging

    Ralph Kahn;Andreas Petzold;Manfred Wendisch;Eike Bierwirth

  • Closure in tropospheric aerosol-climate research : A review and future needs for addressing aerosol direct shortwave radiative forcing

    P. K. Quinn;T. L. Anderson;T. S. Bates;R. Dlugi

  • Spatio-temporal variability of satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness over Northeast Asia in 2004

    Unknown

  • Regional dust model performance during SAMUM 2006

    K. Haustein;C. Pérez;J. M. Baldasano;J. M. Baldasano;D. Müller;D. Müller

  • Analysis of linear long-term trend of aerosol optical thickness derived from SeaWiFS using BAER over Europe and South China

    J. Yoon;W. von Hoyningen-Huene;M. Vountas;J. P. Burrows

  • Estimating a relationship between aerosol optical thickness and surface wind speed over the ocean

    P. Glantz;D. E. Nilsson;W. von Hoyningen-Huene

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander A. Kokhanovsky
Alexander A. Kokhanovsky Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Detlef Müller
Detlef Müller University of Hertfordshire
Manfred Wendisch
Manfred Wendisch Leipzig University
Konrad Kandler
Konrad Kandler Technical University of Darmstadt
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
Albert Ansmann
Albert Ansmann Leibniz Association
Matthias Tesche
Matthias Tesche Leipzig University
Carlos Toledano
Carlos Toledano University of Valladolid
Vladimir V. Rozanov
Vladimir V. Rozanov University of Bremen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. A bachelors degree in sociology online complements environmental studies by providing insights into social behaviors that impact environmental policy and sustainability efforts.

For educators looking to advance their qualifications, there are flexible options like an edd without dissertation, which allows professionals to enhance leadership skills without the traditional dissertation requirement. Additionally, seamless transitions through eds to edd programs provide career advancement for environmental science educators or administrators aiming for doctoral credentials.

Social work plays a crucial role in addressing environmental justice and community health. Pursuing a dsw program online prepares professionals to tackle complex social issues connected to environmental challenges.

By combining environmental sciences with these related online degrees, students and professionals can forge impactful careers addressing the multifaceted challenges of today's world.

Best Scientists Citing W. von Hoyningen-Huene

Recently Published Articles