World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tsung Teh Wu

Tsung Teh Wu

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10209 9581 5248 4848 291 26263

Tsung Teh Wu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tsung Teh Wu between 1994 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tsung Teh Wu published across 28 years, from 1994 to 2021, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2005. 22 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2005. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications
1994 2021

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tsung Teh Wu: publications per year, 1994 to 2021
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 8
2001 11
2002 13
2003 12
2004 10
2005 23
2006 18
2007 13
2008 11
2009 9
2010 8
2011 12
2012 14
2013 18
2014 8
2015 13
2016 9
2017 13
2018 9
2019 18
2020 12
2021 10
Total 278
Download as CSV

Tsung Teh Wu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tsung Teh Wu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 291 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 291
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Tsung Teh Wu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tsung Teh Wu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cancer
  • Internal medicine
  • Gene

Tsung Teh Wu mainly focuses on Pathology, Internal medicine, Cancer research, Cancer and Gastroenterology. His Pathology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Foveolar cell, Adenomatous polyposis coli, Familial adenomatous polyposis and Adenocarcinoma. His Internal medicine research includes elements of Oncology and Loss of heterozygosity.

His research in Cancer research intersects with topics in Cell growth, Carcinogenesis, Mutation, Regulation of gene expression and Hedgehog. His research integrates issues of Radiation therapy and Esophageal disease in his study of Cancer. Tsung Teh Wu combines subjects such as Epidemiology, Surgery, Disease and Dysplasia with his study of Gastroenterology.

His most cited work include:

  • Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases (1030 citations)
  • Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. (758 citations)
  • Solid-Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas Are Genetically Distinct from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas and Almost Always Harbor β-catenin Mutations (389 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Pathology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Adenocarcinoma and Esophagus. His Pathology study combines topics in areas such as Cancer research and Gene mutation. His work carried out in the field of Gene mutation brings together such families of science as Adenomatous polyposis coli, Microsatellite instability and Loss of heterozygosity.

His Internal medicine study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Surgery and Oncology. His Gastroenterology research includes themes of Biopsy and Intestinal mucosa. Tsung Teh Wu has researched Adenocarcinoma in several fields, including Esophagectomy and Lymph node.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Pathology (65.00%)
  • Internal medicine (38.75%)
  • Gastroenterology (26.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Pathology (65.00%)
  • Internal medicine (38.75%)
  • Biopsy (15.63%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Pathology, Internal medicine, Biopsy, Gastroenterology and Immunohistochemistry. He interconnects Hepatocellular carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma in the investigation of issues within Pathology. His Internal medicine research focuses on Surgery and how it relates to Lymphovascular invasion.

His Biopsy research integrates issues from Body mass index, Lesion and Endoscopy. His work on Duodenum as part of general Gastroenterology study is frequently linked to Population, bridging the gap between disciplines. He studied Immunohistochemistry and Differential diagnosis that intersect with Fibrolamellar Carcinoma, C-reactive protein, Serum amyloid A, Carcinoembryonic antigen and Immunostaining.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • No Difference Between Latiglutenase and Placebo in Reducing Villous Atrophy or Improving Symptoms in Patients With Symptomatic Celiac Disease (45 citations)
  • Gastroblastoma harbors a recurrent somatic MALAT1 – GLI1 fusion gene (36 citations)
  • Analysis of Biopsies From Duodenal Bulbs of All Endoscopy Patients Increases Detection of Abnormalities but has a Minimal Effect on Diagnosis of Celiac Disease. (36 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cancer
  • Internal medicine
  • Gene

Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Pathology, Biopsy and Population are his primary areas of study. His research links Surgery with Internal medicine. In the field of Surgery, his study on Chemoradiotherapy, Survival rate and Klatskin tumor overlaps with subjects such as Univariate analysis.

Tsung Teh Wu has included themes like Immunohistochemistry, Glypican 3, Immunostaining, Carcinoembryonic antigen and Differential diagnosis in his Gastroenterology study. His research in the fields of Lamina propria overlaps with other disciplines such as In patient. His Biopsy research incorporates elements of Body mass index, Case-control study and Refractory.

Best Publications

  • Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases

    Jean Nicolas Vauthey;Timothy M. Pawlik;Dario Ribero;Tsung Teh Wu

  • Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

    Toshiaki Watanabe;Tsung Teh Wu;Paul J. Catalano;Paul J. Catalano;Takashi Ueki

  • Comparison of CT Methods for Determining the Fat Content of the Liver

    Yoshihisa Kodama;Chaan S. Ng;Tsung T. Wu;Gregory D. Ayers

  • Solid-Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas Are Genetically Distinct from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas and Almost Always Harbor β-catenin Mutations

    Susan C. Abraham;David S. Klimstra;Robb E. Wilentz;Charles J. Yeo

  • Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation

    Lucian R. Chirieac;Stephen G. Swisher;Jaffer A. Ajani;Ritsuko R. Komaki

  • Transcription Factor Sp1 Expression Is a Significant Predictor of Survival in Human Gastric Cancer

    Liwei Wang;Daoyan Wei;Suyun Huang;Zhihai Peng

  • Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet.

    Alberto Rubio-Tapia;Mussarat W. Rahim;Jacalyn A. See;Brian D. Lahr

  • Severe Spruelike Enteropathy Associated With Olmesartan

    Alberto Rubio-Tapia;Margot L. Herman;Jonas F. Ludvigsson;Jonas F. Ludvigsson;Jonas F. Ludvigsson;Darlene G. Kelly

  • Drastic down-regulation of Krüppel-like factor 4 expression is critical in human gastric cancer development and progression.

    Daoyan Wei;Weida Gong;Masashi Kanai;Christian Schlunk

  • The Crosstalk of mTOR/S6K1 and Hedgehog Pathways

    Yan Wang;Qingqing Ding;Chia Jui Yen;Weiya Xia

  • Endoscopic and Surgical Treatment of Mucosal (T1a) Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus

    Ganapathy A. Prasad;Tsung Teh Wu;Dennis A. Wigle;Navtej S. Buttar

  • Genetic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Frequent Allelic Loss on Chromosome 11p and Alterations in the APC/β-Catenin Pathway

    Susan C. Abraham;Tsung Teh Wu;Ralph H. Hruban;Jae Hyuk Lee

  • 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

    Stephen G. Swisher;Jeremy Erasmus;Mary Maish;Arlene M. Correa

  • Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Localized Gastric Carcinoma: Degree of Pathologic Response and Not Clinical Parameters Dictated Patient Outcome

    Jaffer A. Ajani;P. F. Mansfield;C. H. Crane;T. T. Wu

  • Distinctive Molecular Genetic Alterations in Sporadic and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Associated Pancreatoblastomas: Frequent Alterations in the APC/β-Catenin Pathway and Chromosome 11p

    Susan C. Abraham;Tsung Teh Wu;David S. Klimstra;Laura S. Finn

  • Frequent CpG Island Methylation in Serrated Adenomas of the Colorectum

    Seun Ja Park;Asif Rashid;Jae Hyuk Lee;Sang Geol Kim

  • Clinical staging and survival in refractory celiac disease: a single center experience.

    Alberto Rubio-Tapia;Darlene G. Kelly;Brian D. Lahr;Ahmet Dogan

  • Association between Expression of Transcription Factor Sp1 and Increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression, Advanced Stage, and Poor Survival in Patients with Resected Gastric Cancer

    James C Yao;Liwei Wang;Daoyan Wei;Weida Gong

  • Fundic gland polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis: neoplasms with frequent somatic adenomatous polyposis coli gene alterations.

    Susan C. Abraham;Bunsei Nobukawa;Francis M. Giardiello;Stanley R. Hamilton

  • Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: association with poor outcome.

    Kim L. Wang;Tsung-Teh Wu;In Seon Choi;Huamin Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaffer A. Ajani
Jaffer A. Ajani The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Stanley R. Hamilton
Stanley R. Hamilton City Of Hope National Medical Center
Asif Rashid
Asif Rashid The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Joseph A. Murray
Joseph A. Murray Mayo Clinic
Kenneth K. Wang
Kenneth K. Wang Mayo Clinic
Wayne L. Hofstetter
Wayne L. Hofstetter The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Rajyalakshmi Luthra The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
James C. Yao
James C. Yao The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ritsuko Komaki
Ritsuko Komaki The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine in the USA often goes beyond the traditional MD degree. Aspiring healthcare professionals can advance their education and skills through various online programs. For nurses aiming for leadership roles, the cheapest dnp online programs offer a cost-effective way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice and open doors to executive positions.

If pharmacy interests you, pursuing the cheapest online pharmacy school options can help you earn a doctoral degree while balancing work and family commitments. Alternatively, the demand for health information experts is growing. Studying for an online mhi enables you to dive into health data, compliance, and healthcare IT, all from the convenience of your home.

Not all healthcare careers require advanced degrees. Those seeking efficient paths to enter the industry can consider the cheapest medical billing and coding online courses. These programs are affordable and designed for quick entry into vital support roles within healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Tsung Teh Wu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles